Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Does it ring a bell of a mining company that had a Union and the Union mobilized the workers to stand up for fair wages and terms,
But then the Union changed hands and the new Union leaders upped the dues and were not the same breed as that first union that was behind the working men and women.
The new union then turned in and arrested the original union leader for using the Union's new larger money from excessive dues and fees of their own workers, to feed poor people which was fraud against the union. But this leader was seen by the original workers as the true engineer of the Union before it went corrupt.
Is this correct?
And Albertans today are not as pro-Union though they were the true original brave souls who coordinates the first unions and were behind the earliest phases of women's rights in Canada. Is there truth to what I'm saying? Explain.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
