Canada experiences a terror attack September 30 2017 (wedding, law, moving to)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This man did not have an inherent right to be here - he was accepted to Canada (out from his crappy hellhole aka Somalia, not exactly aligned with western values) because of good will and compassion of Canada and Canadian people. And Canadians also have some rights - one of them is to be protected by government authorities. Taking the risk to bring people from such dark places as Somalia and then ignoring the duties by tolerating extremist behaviour of such "refugees" is clearly a disrespect of basic rights of Canadian people.
Who is tolerating extremist behaviour? He's under arrest. You write that as though he showed up in a refugee lineup espousing ISIS sympathies to immigration authorities and they decided to 'tolerate' that and let him in anyway.
Who is tolerating extremist behaviour? He's under arrest. You write that as though he showed up in a refugee lineup espousing ISIS sympathies to immigration authorities and they decided to 'tolerate' that and let him in anyway.
He is under arrest after commiting a terror attack. And it is a pure miracle that no innocent people got killed. He should had been deported in the first place in 2015.
He is under arrest after commiting a terror attack. And it is a pure miracle that no innocent people got killed. He should had been deported in the first place in 2015.
As has been asked of you already; how and why would he have been deported....mere suspicion, colour of skin, country of origin, size of his feet?
He had done nothing to warrant usurping his rights except expressing controversial opinions.
He is under arrest after commiting a terror attack. And it is a pure miracle that no innocent people got killed. He should had been deported in the first place in 2015.
Well, using your logic, you should be deported back to the U.S., for holding the extremist view that Canada should become a police state. Who knows what extremist actions you might take in future.
Well, using your logic, you should be deported back to the U.S., for holding the extremist view that Canada should become a police state. Who knows what extremist actions you might take in future.
Why U.S.?
Taking care about security of the citizens and sending back people who hate us dearly and want to kill as many "infidels" as possible is a very logical step any responsible government should take. It is not a police state.
As has been asked of you already; how and why would he have been deported....mere suspicion, colour of skin, country of origin, size of his feet?
He had done nothing to warrant usurping his rights except expressing controversial opinions.
That may be the case but I suspect that if this keeps up that the controversial opinions he expressed will become illegal at some point in the future. Kind of like saying you have a bomb in airport. But on a wider level across society.
That may be the case but I suspect that if this keeps up that the controversial opinions he expressed will become illegal at some point in the future. Kind of like saying you have a bomb in airport. But on a wider level across society.
No doubt it will depend on exactly what the extremist views were he was apparently espousing for some time. It nevertheless will cause agencies charged with observing these guys to be on a much higher level of wariness. That's probably a good thing.
Taking care about security of the citizens and sending back people who hate us dearly and want to kill as many "infidels" as possible is a very logical step any responsible government should take. It is not a police state.
If all your assumptions in this one post were taken as factual and thusly acted upon, it sure as heck would be a police state and no doubt about it.
If all your assumptions in this one post were taken as factual and thusly acted upon, it sure as heck would be a police state and no doubt about it.
But Islamophobia Motion-103 is totally ok with you, right? So we can have a leftist police state with no freedom of speech and all other PC bs, but god forbid us to deport back islamists plotting to kill us. Nice...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
