Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Canada
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-26-2018, 05:43 PM
 
22,923 posts, read 15,477,951 times
Reputation: 16962

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyyc View Post
Until you get flooded like High River, and the RCMP go boot kicking door to door looking for your guns.
Be fair mikey; some senior officer decided those firearms needed to be secured from possible looters and when it all came out they were seized by breaking into private property and taken without warrants they were ordered to return them AND pay for the broken doors.

A pity the RCMP are not more concerned about the handguns finding their way into Canada than those hunting rifles secured behind locked doors in an evacuated flood zone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-27-2018, 08:43 AM
 
Location: Hougary, Texberta
9,019 posts, read 14,282,260 times
Reputation: 11032
You forgot your /s tag


Having gone through Harvey just recently, if that happened here, there quite literally would have been a firefight.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2018, 08:46 AM
 
Location: Hougary, Texberta
9,019 posts, read 14,282,260 times
Reputation: 11032
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoisite View Post
It's my understanding they only started doing that after looters had started invading houses and stealing guns that weren't in safes and that the RCMP only took any unsecured firearms that were visible and left out in the open. Owners had those guns returned to them afterwards. What conflicting stories did you hear?


.
a. You don't have looters if you have police presence
b. You mean, no warrant, illegal search, breaking and entering, and even if you didn't have firearms?


Yeah, they only took the ones out in the open, like in the back of closets, or locked away, or hidden throughout the home. You know, wide open... If you're going to force people from their homes you have a duty to protect the homes, not to break in and loot them yourselves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2018, 10:44 AM
 
Location: Vancouver
18,504 posts, read 15,536,880 times
Reputation: 11937
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyyc View Post
a. You don't have looters if you have police presence
b. You mean, no warrant, illegal search, breaking and entering, and even if you didn't have firearms?


Yeah, they only took the ones out in the open, like in the back of closets, or locked away, or hidden throughout the home. You know, wide open... If you're going to force people from their homes you have a duty to protect the homes, not to break in and loot them yourselves.
Well, you do have looters with police presence. The police can't be everywhere at once.

Also, legally the RCMP were allowed to enter the homes.

"The RCMP had legal authority to forcibly enter evacuated homes during the natural disaster and even to seize loose firearms in plain view, the commission report says."....

"...Under the Criminal Code, such seizures did not require a court-approved warrant, but officers failed to take the necessary next step of reporting their actions to a judge."

That doesn't mean that they did everything correctly.

"In addition, RCMP members exceeded their authority by seizing some guns that were properly secured or that were not "in plain view," the commission found."

RCMP watchdog raps Mounties over High River gun seizures during 2013 flood - Politics - CBC News
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2018, 12:24 PM
 
10,839 posts, read 14,716,100 times
Reputation: 7873
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mouldy Old Schmo View Post
Is it simply lack of easy access to firearms, or are there other reasons?
what a weird question, among developed countries, Canada doesn’t seem to have “so few gun shooting”. When was the last time you hear it happen in Japan, Australia or Germany.

The reason: you live in a world composed of two countries.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2018, 01:07 PM
 
Location: Vancouver
18,504 posts, read 15,536,880 times
Reputation: 11937
Quote:
Originally Posted by botticelli View Post
what a weird question, among developed countries, Canada doesn’t seem to have “so few gun shooting”. When was the last time you hear it happen in Japan, Australia or Germany.

The reason: you live in a world composed of two countries.
Considering the OP's location and the Forum they posted in, Canada, one would think that " compared to the United States" is implied.

Welcome back by the way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2018, 02:22 PM
 
Location: Hougary, Texberta
9,019 posts, read 14,282,260 times
Reputation: 11032
Quote:
Originally Posted by Natnasci View Post
Well, you do have looters with police presence. The police can't be everywhere at once.

Also, legally the RCMP were allowed to enter the homes.

"The RCMP had legal authority to forcibly enter evacuated homes during the natural disaster and even to seize loose firearms in plain view, the commission report says."....

"...Under the Criminal Code, such seizures did not require a court-approved warrant, but officers failed to take the necessary next step of reporting their actions to a judge."

That doesn't mean that they did everything correctly.

"In addition, RCMP members exceeded their authority by seizing some guns that were properly secured or that were not "in plain view," the commission found."

RCMP watchdog raps Mounties over High River gun seizures during 2013 flood - Politics - CBC News
Let's just agree that it's not a shining light in the history of the RCMP, and just because it was legal, doesn't make it right. 2100+ homes broken into, 600 guns seized, and the majority of those illegally.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2018, 02:32 PM
 
Location: Vancouver
18,504 posts, read 15,536,880 times
Reputation: 11937
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyyc View Post
Let's just agree that it's not a shining light in the history of the RCMP, and just because it was legal, doesn't make it right. 2100+ homes broken into, 600 guns seized, and the majority of those illegally.
I'm not disagreeing. I'm just pointing out for the sake of accuracy that not everything you said they did was illegal. Like breaking and entering, That's a fairly serious charge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2018, 02:32 PM
 
22,923 posts, read 15,477,951 times
Reputation: 16962
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyyc View Post
Let's just agree that it's not a shining light in the history of the RCMP, and just because it was legal, doesn't make it right. 2100+ homes broken into, 600 guns seized, and the majority of those illegally.
There have been more than one recent tarnishing of the RCMP shield. They've lost significant respect among Canadians over the last couple of years. Rampant sexual harassment going all the way to the top tier officers gone unaddressed for decades is just one of their most recent negatives.

They need to up their game.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2018, 03:01 PM
 
Location: Hougary, Texberta
9,019 posts, read 14,282,260 times
Reputation: 11032
Quote:
Originally Posted by Natnasci View Post
I'm not disagreeing. I'm just pointing out for the sake of accuracy that not everything you said they did was illegal. Like breaking and entering, That's a fairly serious charge.
Not everything, just the vast majority of it. That, and the stuff that was legal, they didn't finish it properly.


Apologies for not letting it go. My wife and her family are all from High River, and to see what was done to their homes on top of the flooding in the name of "safety" was ludicrous. Plus none of them own firearms.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Canada

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:15 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top