Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Celebrities
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-26-2011, 12:36 PM
 
83 posts, read 99,500 times
Reputation: 44

Advertisements

On October 24th, 2011 the New York Post ran an absurd little blurb on p.14 claiming that the Jonas Brothers were keeping teenage Asian performers in illegal and dangerous rooms above their studio in Manhattan.

The "reporter" also claimed that these girls had made millions of dollars for the Jonas Brothers but were being housed like "illegal immigrants on a work farm."

The only problem: 1) The Jonas Brothers don't own a studio in Manhattan,


2) The girls are not teenagers



3) These girls have not
made much, if any, money for the Jonas Brothers.

So how do experienced newspeople make this kind of mistake?

Obviously, no mistake was made. False statements seem to have been deliberately printed in the Post.

So the Post issued a retraction that also contained a false statement.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/jonas_brothers_correction_6yLuNa2NbpgG5rifmk9moJ

The Post wrote that they were mistaken and that a foreign company called JYPE is being investigated.

Wrong. In the previous blurb the reporter quotes inspectors as saying the girls lived "like illegal immigrants etc." This clearly indicates the investigation is over.

Indeed, JYP Entertainment has been investigated and the City has determined that their building contains illegal and dangerous rooms.

http://a810-bisweb.nyc.gov/bisweb/PropertyProfileOverviewServlet?boro=1&houseno=110& street=e.+31st&requestid=0&s=A03C41B885B461E4F46BD 08866A7430E

Why is the Post going out of its way to apparently cover up for this shady foreign company?

First they claimed the Jonas Brothers were the guilty party and then they refused to admit that the Korean entertainment company has been found guilty of keeping young performers in firetraps.

How can anyone trust a "newspaper" like this? This is just a disgraceful display of journalism that even high school journalists don't resort to.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-26-2011, 12:47 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn New York
18,470 posts, read 31,638,910 times
Reputation: 28009
and we would be interested in "The Jonas Brothers" because??????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????????????

I have more interest for the rock out in front of my office building.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2011, 12:48 PM
 
Location: Manhattan
1,871 posts, read 4,266,898 times
Reputation: 2937
The Post has been an hideously biased newspaper for awhile. They could care less about accuracy if they are up against a deadline to get a sensational article in. Just go to their online website and read some of the opinion posts at the end of the "articles" and you'll get an idea as to the average intelligence level of the regular readership.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2011, 04:52 PM
 
83 posts, read 99,500 times
Reputation: 44
Default Why do people buy the post?

I don't even understand.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2011, 05:00 PM
 
Location: The Present
2,006 posts, read 4,307,651 times
Reputation: 1987
The quality of their journalists is equal to the amount of illiteracy found in their readership.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2011, 05:21 PM
 
Location: Bergen County, NJ
9,847 posts, read 25,244,838 times
Reputation: 3629
It's the New York Post. What do you expect?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2011, 05:25 PM
 
Location: The United States of Amnesia
1,355 posts, read 1,921,623 times
Reputation: 686
Why would you read a newspaper? I get all my news online for FREE.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2011, 06:52 AM
 
83 posts, read 99,500 times
Reputation: 44
Default wow

They moved this thread out of New york City to the celebrity section :P
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2011, 09:57 AM
 
Location: Portland, OR
4,275 posts, read 7,631,148 times
Reputation: 2943
Quote:
Originally Posted by celticvisa View Post
I don't even understand.
The same reason people by the National Enquirer. Whatever that may be....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2011, 10:00 AM
 
Location: Portland, OR
4,275 posts, read 7,631,148 times
Reputation: 2943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sith Klato View Post
Why would you read a newspaper? I get all my news online for FREE.
Some people like to actually be able to read a newspaper as opposed tp an electronic device. Just a preference. I subscribe to Spin Magazine and would rather have the magazine
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Celebrities

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:23 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top