U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Celebrities
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-19-2014, 05:35 AM
 
Location: Northern VA (for now)
23,031 posts, read 32,006,557 times
Reputation: 30428

Advertisements

Twitter Shows Massive Thirst Over Arrested Model’s Mugshot | 93.9 WKYS

Quote:
As the pic circulated the Internet, it revived the term #FelonBae, brought about originally by Jeremy Meeks back in June. This time around, it’s the fellas’ turn to lust over the former Jet “Beauty of the Week” who happened to get locked up. While her bail was set at just $360, tons of Twitter followers offered to pay for the vixen’s release and inspired some rather thirsty commentary.
Well payback for #felonbae.

For the benefit of those not up on urban slang.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Thirsty
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-19-2014, 06:26 AM
 
Location: SacTown
1,260 posts, read 939,060 times
Reputation: 1937
She's hot. I'd smash it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2014, 07:42 AM
 
Location: Terra
2,827 posts, read 3,059,342 times
Reputation: 3331
She's not bad, but 5'7" and 140 lbs is kinda pushing it for a 22 y/o. Also not my "type."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2014, 07:46 AM
 
Location: So Cal
69 posts, read 52,531 times
Reputation: 130
When I saw the tittle I immediately thought Jeremy Meeks. lol. Guess it's the guys' turn :P
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2014, 07:51 AM
 
Location: So Cal
69 posts, read 52,531 times
Reputation: 130
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsun556 View Post
She's not bad, but 5'7" and 140 lbs is kinda pushing it for a 22 y/o. Also not my "type."
What? lol, I thought the general 'rule' was 100lbs starting at 5' and then 5lbs for every additional inch, following that she should be 135, I wouldn't say that's pushing it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2014, 08:27 AM
 
1,166 posts, read 914,635 times
Reputation: 1002
The reaction to the male model a few months back from women was way worse. Just shows that women are way more superficial than men.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2014, 08:44 AM
 
Location: Terra
2,827 posts, read 3,059,342 times
Reputation: 3331
Quote:
Originally Posted by LittleFishBigPond View Post
What? lol, I thought the general 'rule' was 100lbs starting at 5' and then 5lbs for every additional inch, following that she should be 135, I wouldn't say that's pushing it.
Maybe for someone in their 30s. But most 22 y/os I've known haven't grown into that body style as of yet. Unless they're of a thicker variety.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2014, 10:56 AM
 
Location: New Jersey
6,043 posts, read 6,093,424 times
Reputation: 4757
Not my bag but obviously she is attractive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2014, 10:59 AM
 
Location: The Great West
2,073 posts, read 1,897,522 times
Reputation: 4043
Quote:
Originally Posted by LittleFishBigPond View Post
What? lol, I thought the general 'rule' was 100lbs starting at 5' and then 5lbs for every additional inch, following that she should be 135, I wouldn't say that's pushing it.
There's no "rule," there's a range because women have different body types, FYI.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jsun556 View Post
Maybe for someone in their 30s. But most 22 y/os I've known haven't grown into that body style as of yet. Unless they're of a thicker variety.
Lol nope. The range for women at 5'7 is from about 120 lbs to 150.

All this says is that this model is actually a healthy weight for her height. I would have expected her to be like 110 lbs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2014, 11:45 AM
 
Location: In a place beyond human comprehension
6,741 posts, read 4,250,183 times
Reputation: 10401
Quote:
Originally Posted by savoytruffle View Post
There's no "rule," there's a range because women have different body types, FYI.


Lol nope. The range for women at 5'7 is from about 120 lbs to 150.

All this says is that this model is actually a healthy weight for her height. I would have expected her to be like 110 lbs.
She's very pretty.

She might be a different kind of model though. Like a commercial model, and not the runway type. Runways and fashion models are pretty strict on the diet, while commercial models are a little more lenient.

Also depends on the agencies. Some modeling agencies like it when girls have a little meat on their bones, especially on the backside. She looks like the "music video type." I'm the exact same height as her, just a little thinner lol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Celebrities
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2018, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top