Quote:
Originally Posted by phonelady61
How many of us have children that are not ours bigologically but we still love them just the same ? I dont care if they were his bios or not . I just want them to be cared for and loved and maybe the grand parents or the aunts and uncles can take them and care for them if so that is great but would never let the mama have them she threw them away for money and to me that dont spell momma . that spells golddigger . she would be the last one I would even consider letting have those kids .
|
She had them specifically for Michael Jackson.
It's not like she sold him her kids.
More like he special-ordered them from her.
She offered herself as a surrogate.
Quote:
|
Mock my words this is going to end up being a nasty sittuation.
|
I'll leave that one alone.
Look, Michael Jackson is the
legal parent of all three children.
He is the
only legal parent any one of them has.
He has been since the day they were born.
As a birthmother, I am aware- unlike some here, apparently- of what that means.
It doesn't make a flip of difference if they're his biological children with a surrogate, or if he hired a surrogate and she was inseminated with the donor sperm of a third party, or if he actually had sex with a woman and made these children, or if he adopted these children from some poor family in another country.
The fact is, since birth, these have been
his children. Only his.
When children are legally adopted, their original birth certificates are sealed forever (or in some states, for 99 years), and they are isued new, amended birth certificates which state that the adoptive parent/s are the child's
only parent/s.
Nowhere on this amended birth certificate will it mention that the child is adopted.
In the eyes of the law, that child's true heritage is wiped clean away, and he is
as if born to the person who legally adopted him.
There is no distinction made, after that, between a biological and an adoptive child.
If the adoptive parents die, the biological parents don't get the kids
back.
It's as if the biological parents never existed.
The children will go to some relative of their adoptive parent, or to a guardian designated by the adoptive parent, if that parent left instructions to that effect in a will, or they will go to the State.
The fact that they are adopted means
nothing.
The fact that they may have biological relatives out there in the world somewhere means
nothing.
Those biological relatives mean nothing to the courts. They don't exist, in the court's eyes. And they no doubt mean nothing to the children in question, either.
Those children have lost their father, their only parent, the only one they ever had.
I'm sure, since they can't have him any longer, they'd prefer to be with his parents, or with their aunts and uncles.
The Jackson family is a large family, and an affluent family.
I'm sure they can find a place in their hearts and homes for Michael's children.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
