Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Cell Phones and Smartphones
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-29-2013, 07:26 AM
 
8,411 posts, read 7,421,908 times
Reputation: 6409

Advertisements

I hear you. I gave up on Sprint and switched. The data were I live is super slow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-29-2013, 11:59 AM
 
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
16,548 posts, read 19,694,332 times
Reputation: 13331
Such first world problems we have.
Am I the only one thinking that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2013, 06:07 PM
 
Location: Mishawaka, Indiana
7,010 posts, read 11,975,078 times
Reputation: 5813
You get what you pay for. Have fun with your 3G service.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2013, 12:31 AM
 
Location: Police State
1,472 posts, read 2,410,004 times
Reputation: 1232
Please don't look at big red as much of an improvement over Sprint. Ah Verizon, the huge network with the huge prices and tiny data caps. I think the only reason why I still put up with them is because I'm on a grandfathered unlimited data plan (and to keep it I'll have to purchase a phone off contract at full retail price for any upgrades) for my phone while carrying four other lines for family, so it would be an inconvenience to move everyone off to another carrier.

Sprint's mistake was going all in with WiMax which was a gigantic flop and their customers are paying the price for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2013, 07:34 AM
 
24,488 posts, read 41,138,516 times
Reputation: 12920
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZhugeLiang View Post
Sprint's mistake was going all in with WiMax which was a gigantic flop and their customers are paying the price for it.
What do you suggest Sprint should have done instead of deploy WiMax?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2013, 03:23 PM
 
Location: Police State
1,472 posts, read 2,410,004 times
Reputation: 1232
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJBest View Post
What do you suggest Sprint should have done instead of deploy WiMax?
Should have found a better partner than Clearwire which is a borderline ponzi scheme or gone with LTE from the start.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2013, 04:13 PM
 
Location: Tyler, TX
23,864 posts, read 24,108,334 times
Reputation: 15135
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miker2069 View Post
Finally done being a fool and waiting for Sprint's 4G LTE network to be built out. I remember when they were buildng out 4G and it wasn't this bad and this long. Found out that in Charlotte they won't have LTE fully completed until July 2013 after being told it was supposed to be end of last year, latest possible 1/13 or 2/13.

I don't even want to hear the "it will be the fastest LTE when it's all done"...such garbage. I wish I knew this way before renewing my contract and buying a cool samsung phone that can't get 4G LTE because of the carrier.

I'm paying the early term fee and switching to Verizon...
Thanks for starting this thread. It reminded me to take a look to see if they had the LTE rollout scheduled yet for Las Vegas. They don't.

Our new Cricket phones were delivered today. I'm also going to pay whatever I have to in order to escape the Sprint madness. We pay a LOT for six phones, including $10/mo EACH for "premium" data service (4G) that we have no access to. Screw that. Bye bye, Sprint.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2013, 06:41 PM
 
24,488 posts, read 41,138,516 times
Reputation: 12920
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZhugeLiang View Post
Should have found a better partner than Clearwire which is a borderline ponzi scheme
I find it hard to believe that there's a bidding war on a ponzi scheme. Their partnership is paying off now isn't it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZhugeLiang View Post
or gone with LTE from the start.
LTE wasn't ready at the time.

Sprint's deployment of WiMax and partnership with Clearwire was a really smart movie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2013, 07:13 AM
 
5,802 posts, read 9,894,970 times
Reputation: 3051
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdAilment View Post
You get what you pay for. Have fun with your 3G service.
Tell that to this person on Verizon with LTE.

LMAO!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2013, 09:10 AM
 
24,488 posts, read 41,138,516 times
Reputation: 12920
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackbeauty212 View Post
Tell that to this person on Verizon with LTE.

LMAO!
I can attest to that not being an accurate representation of Verizon LTE speeds in NYC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Cell Phones and Smartphones
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:02 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top