Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Cell Phones and Smartphones
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-17-2019, 01:15 PM
 
3,149 posts, read 2,695,105 times
Reputation: 11965

Advertisements

I'm upgrading from my miserably small 8GB Moto G (3rd gen). My two top choices are the new Moto G7+ and the old Pixel 2. Can anyone speak to the quality of either phone's camera and associated software?

The Pixel is a 2017 flagship phone with an outstanding camera. Review websites cite it as being better than the G7, but the G7+ has a camera upgrade with OIS. Does that make it better?

I like Motorola, especially for the twist-motion-activated camera and the chop-chop-motion activated flashlight. My MotoG lasted forever, and I'm only upgrading because my tiny 8GB of onboard storage means I can run exactly 3 (tiny) apps, and I can't even take 30s of video any more. Because of the way the phone is designed, I can't store photos on the memory card and have them automatically upload to google.

I'm probably going to go with the Pixel 2. I like that it's waterproof (I go to the beach a lot, and need it at least sand/dust proof) and I like that it's small.

Anybody have a Moto G7+ can convince me it's worth the extra $50 over an older pixel 2?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-17-2019, 01:25 PM
 
18,047 posts, read 15,639,191 times
Reputation: 26761
I have the G7 Power edition. Love it. I wanted the bigger battery and with light usage my phone will last 7+ days, occasionally up to 9.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2019, 03:03 PM
 
3,149 posts, read 2,695,105 times
Reputation: 11965
How's the camera?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2019, 03:56 PM
 
18,047 posts, read 15,639,191 times
Reputation: 26761
It's fine. For my serious photos I use my Nikon SLR.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2019, 06:45 AM
 
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
16,544 posts, read 19,672,308 times
Reputation: 13326
The Pixels have the best cameras on them in the Android world. Period.
Samsung is number 2.
This should be common knowledge by now.
Also check out the Pixel 3A.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2019, 10:29 AM
 
Location: NYC
20,550 posts, read 17,683,966 times
Reputation: 25616
Pixel 3A or XL. The cheaper Pixel is better than both the Pixel 2/3 because it still retained the headphone jack and pictures are damn good. Brand new starting at $329.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2019, 07:51 AM
 
Location: Southern California
12,713 posts, read 15,520,307 times
Reputation: 35512
Get the Pixel 3a if you can swing it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2019, 02:15 PM
 
Location: (six-cent-dix-sept)
6,639 posts, read 4,567,370 times
Reputation: 4730
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peregrine View Post
The Pixels have the best cameras on them in the Android world. Period.
Samsung is number 2.
This should be common knowledge by now.
Also check out the Pixel 3A.
galaxy k zoom (half trolling).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2019, 03:01 PM
 
3,149 posts, read 2,695,105 times
Reputation: 11965
I got an open-box "new" Pixel 2 for $170. Came with protective shell and screen shield.

I'm happy with my decision. The camera is amazing! It actually sees BETTER in low-light than my eyeballs!
First Impressions:

Positives:
+ Amazing Camera
+ All the cool photo software/AI stuff: motion-capture pictures, slow-mo, time-lapse, night vision
+ Almost exactly the same size as my MotoG (3rd Gen), so not too bulky.
+ Crazy screen resolution.
+ Great value for the fast processor.
+ Immediately upgraded itself from Android 9.0 to 10.0 - Expecting to be able to put in AI call screening and other google-hardware-specific updates as they roll out.
+ Good riddance to the headphone jack. Never used it on any of my phones.
+ Google assistant is fun and responsive.

Negatives:
- Battery seems weak. Light useage + 30 minutes of active navigation puts me at 44% after 2/3rds of the day.
- Don't like having to buy a few more USB to USB-C cords.
- I miss the Motorola gestures (twist for camera, chop for flashlight). Those were the best thing ever.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Cell Phones and Smartphones
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:45 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top