Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Cell Phones and Smartphones
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-02-2010, 10:12 AM
 
Location: Texas
44,256 posts, read 64,251,312 times
Reputation: 73924

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeJaquish View Post
"Rationalizing?"
I don't think so.
"Special?"
I don't think I am special. Not anymore than anyone else. But, we covered that already.

"Rationalizing" may also be construed as using a flawed study, one that sets out to prove a point by massaging and constructing data as needed, for the Luddite ego trip of restricting others' behavior, but only specific behavior and on the slimmest of grounds, without regard to other similar behaviors.

Even the proffered study uses weasel words to water down the "proof."

"Proven?" Certainly not by the study offered. Not even close. The study had a goal, and assembled weak information to support the goal.
Not talking about the study offered. There have been many more studies. But it is rationalizing. No one is as good at driving while using their cell phones as they are when they are not. Period. Your arguments just go to how much you are willing to risk other people's lives to have your phone conversation. You figure you're risking them less than other people would (by the graces of your superior multitasking skills) and you are ok with that. That is so selfish as to not be believed.

I know someone just like you who ran someone off the road and nearly killed them before she changed her attitude. I hope it doesn't come to that.



McEvoy SP, Stevenson MR, McCartt AT , et al. Role of mobile phones in motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance: a case-crossover study. Br Med J. 2005;331:428–430.

Drews, F. A., Pasupathi, M., & Strayer, D. L. (2008). Passenger and Cell Phone Conversations During Simulated Driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied , 14, 000-000.

Strayer, D. L., & Drews, F. A.(2007). Cell-Phone-Induced Driver Distraction. Current Directions In Psychological Sicence, 16, 128-131.

Strayer, D. L., Drews, F. A. & Johnston, W. A. (2003). Cell phone induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 23-23.

Strayer, D. L., & Johnston, W. A. (2001). Driven to distraction: Dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular phone. Psychological Science, 12, 462-466.

Drive against texting motorists grows | Tulsa World

Cell Phone Warning: Walking & Talking Don't Mix! | Neuroscience | Discoveries and Breakthroughs Inside Science

Drivers on Cell Phones Kill Thousands, Snarl Traffic | LiveScience


Consumer Reports Cars Blog: NHTSA withholds government study exposing cell phone driving dangers
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Cell Phones and Smartphones
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top