Is Al Gore in SC ?

[pcamps]

Originally Posted by Geechie North

No, it's more to do with dogmatic beliefs among those who refuse to believe what is an obvious fact.

Has happened before; usually for religious/cultural reasons.

Anyway,

GW is a fact, and be prepared to become increasing isolated on an intelluctual basis if you doubt that.

All that needs to be said.

It's an obvious hoax and no matter how much you try and shout down all who disagree with you it doesn't and won't change the fact it's a hoax.

[Geechie North]

Originally Posted by OleTomCat

No there isn't an overwhelming consensus of schientists that say Global Warming is Real and Man made....

And the pier review is only good if the piers are on the opposite side of the argument and they agree with your findings, I have provided you with a list of Scientists that disagree and you call them phonies and in the pockets of the oil companies...

You do not understand peer review, Tom.

[SCBeaches]

Well, I am just glad that YOU understand EVERYTHING so well, Geechie, that's all that really matters. I really am glad for you. Your understanding of and knowledge about everything and anything...is, let's just say - impressive. Yes, we are all very impressed. There - I'm sure that's what you've been wanting to hear. Happy?

[OleTomCat]

Originally Posted by Geechie North

You do not understand peer review, Tom.

Yes I do understand Peer review.....

You are not the only one who can read.....

But if all of your peers agree with you and you don't get reviewed by the ones that do not agree or you simply disregaurd them as knuts and freeks who should be shuned then what good is peer review....

I can walk into and NRA or John Burch meating and find lots of peers that agree with me on Gun Control, does that mean that there should be free reign on teflon coated bullets and automatic weapons??

NO

[Geechie North]

No.

I'm not wating to hear anything.


All I can say has already been said, except to say that be careful just how far you diverge from accepted scientific beliefs, lest you be handling snakes in some fleabag church in Tennessee, 'cause you are sure that is the best way to cure your sister's hemorrhoids.

Take care, and keep on reading and, hopefully, learning.

[SCBeaches]

[quote=Geechie North;8981218]No.

I'm not wating to hear anything.


All I can say has already been said, except to say that be careful just how far you diverge from accepted scientific beliefs,lest you be handling snakes in some fleabag church in Tennessee, 'cause you are sure that is the best way to cure your sister's hemorrhoids.

You mean that doesn't work? Dang!

[Geechie North]

Originally Posted by OleTomCat

Yes I do understand Peer review.....

You are not the only one who can read.....

But if all of your peers agree with you and you don't get reviewed by the ones that do not agree or you simply disregaurd them as knuts and freeks who should be shuned then what good is peer review....

I can walk into and NRA or John Burch meating and find lots of peers that agree with me on Gun Control, does that mean that there should be free reign on teflon coated bullets and automatic weapons??

NO

Sense About Science | Peer Review

[Geechie North]

[quote=SCBeaches;8981356]

Originally Posted by Geechie North

No.

I'm not wating to hear anything.


All I can say has already been said, except to say that be careful just how far you diverge from accepted scientific beliefs,lest you be handling snakes in some fleabag church in Tennessee, 'cause you are sure that is the best way to cure your sister's hemorrhoids.

You mean that doesn't work? Dang!

Try to get empirical evidence; subject it to the peer review process.

Quien sabes? But don't bet the house money on it.

And I bid this thread a fond farewell.

[OleTomCat]

Tata....