Quote:
Originally Posted by pcamps
|
I asked for the data to support your claim that when Al Gore speaks the temperature at the locale he's speaking at drops, and you gave some clown misquoting a Canadian Gov't (original source) study on polar bears.
So, now here's the reality behind that:
WWF - Polar Bear Factsheet
"* Very recent Ontario
Government research shows that
polar bears in this
population are now experiencing significant declines in body condition since the mid-1980s, which, when combined with satellite data on sea ice reductions, suggests that
population declines may follow (Obbard et al. 2006).
Obbard, M.E. 2006. Temporal trends in the Body Condition of Southern Hudson Bay
Polar Bears. Climate Change Research Information Note Number 3.
Government of Ontario, Applied Research and Development Branch. Pp. 8. (
sit.mnr.gov.on.ca)
To summarize the above table:
A. Of the 13
Canadian polar bear populations, the current trends for the 11 populations not known to be severely reduced from historic levels are:
Stable = 5
Declining = 5
Data deficient = 1
B. The estimated risks of
polar bear population declines in the next 10 years are:
Very high/higher = 5
Lower/very low = 6 (but see Southern Hudson Bay
population note above)
No estimate = 2"
So, now that's another of your claims down in smoke.
So what site you using next? "ALGoreissatan.com"?
Guys, you ought to get a new schtik. I mean, you folks (religionists) been doing this since Galileo, and all it's done is shoot your credibility in the arse-end.