Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
There's alot of misinformation on this thread....(they don't have a history of scores in the 80's)
If you look at the last sanitation scores from the past 1 1/2 yrs (besides the 89 and the 98) it goes as follows...
96
97
98
98
96.5
96
95
Again, sanitation scores are only as good as the SPECIFIC violations on each report (could be bugs/roaches etc...could be something else. That's what that article in the disturber showed us a couple weeks ago)
There's alot of misinformation on this thread....(they don't have a history of scores in the 80's)
If you look at the last sanitation scores from the past 1 1/2 yrs (besides the 89 and the 98) it goes as follows...
96
97
98
98
96.5
96
95
Again, sanitation scores are only as good as the SPECIFIC violations on each report (could be bugs/roaches etc...could be something else. That's what that article in the disturber showed us a couple weeks ago)
Historically, this location has been pretty good.
I was thinking the same thing. I had to hunt all the way down to 2007 to find the "history" of 80's.
1. Definition of the word history: •a record or narrative description of past events
2. In 2007 & 2011 they received a score in the 80's.
3. Ergo, they have a history of receiving scores in the 80's. Do they also have a history of getting scores in the 90's? Yes.
A link to the exact reports was provided. Please explain to me how I provided misinformation.
More like misleading. The way the post was worded sounded like they always had a history of 80's when the most recent (history) 4 years, they consistently got high 90's.
More like misleading. The way the post was worded sounded like they always had a history of 80's when the most recent (history) 4 years, they consistently got high 90's.
I disagree that it was even misleading. I made a factual statement and submitted supporting evidence. How people interpret it is not my problem.
I disagree that it was even misleading. I made a factual statement and submitted supporting evidence. How people interpret it is not my problem.
Please own up to it and admit it... there's nothing wrong w/that.
It is misleading at the minimum....
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
there's nothing wrong w/that.
