U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina > Charlotte
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-27-2016, 11:58 AM
 
45,061 posts, read 17,902,619 times
Reputation: 18888

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolf Howl View Post
Maybe that extra camera would have captured the Bible that Mr. Scott was holding you guys!?!
Are they saying Bible now? LOL. I thought that Scott was Muslim.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-27-2016, 12:02 PM
 
2,200 posts, read 2,377,886 times
Reputation: 3145
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
..................

OP's title is wrong. He never activated a camera, because he didn't have one.
OP is simply quoting the article. The "news" reporter led with the incorrect title, not the OP.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2016, 12:31 PM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
8,779 posts, read 7,960,459 times
Reputation: 3757
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
Plain clothes officer = Undercover officer

Tactical team /= Undercover officer



OP's title is wrong. He never activated a camera, because he didn't have one.
Detectives and other officers regularly wear plain clothes without being "undercover", but we're going down a rabbit hole, here.


I believe the story is that one of the OTHER officers, not the guy who shot Mr. Scott, didn't turn his body cam on until after the shooting started.


From the article linked:


...police did not capture key video footage of last week's fatal shooting of Keith Lamont Scott because A responding officer apparently didn't turn on his body camera until after police had already shot the victim...


...CMPD has not identified the officer who was wearing the body cam in Scott’s case....


...Officer Brentley Vinson, who police said fired four shots at Scott, was not wearing a body cam, so his visual perspective was not part of the footage...



Emphasis mine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2016, 12:55 PM
 
Location: Charlotte NC
11,723 posts, read 9,374,209 times
Reputation: 5239
Quote:
Originally Posted by southbound_295 View Post
Do you also think that Mrs Scott filing a restraining order in 2015 & citing that gun from the shooting site is part of your grand conspiracy?
no... that episode has nothing to do with this one
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2016, 12:57 PM
 
Location: Charlotte NC
11,723 posts, read 9,374,209 times
Reputation: 5239
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
Plain clothes officer = Undercover officer

Tactical team /= Undercover officer



OP's title is wrong. He never activated a camera, because he didn't have one.
who said the officer who didnt activate his camera was also the shooter?

the title is fine, they arent talking about the undercover officer
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2016, 01:00 PM
 
Location: Charlotte NC
11,723 posts, read 9,374,209 times
Reputation: 5239
Quote:
Originally Posted by getatag View Post
OP is simply quoting the article. The "news" reporter led with the incorrect title, not the OP.
its not incorrect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2016, 01:32 PM
 
378 posts, read 226,530 times
Reputation: 342
Quote:
Originally Posted by southbound_295 View Post
Do you also think that Mrs Scott filing a restraining order in 2015 & citing that gun from the shooting site is part of your grand conspiracy?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feltdesigner View Post
no... that episode has nothing to do with this one
In the ongoing investigation, in any related criminal proceeding (grand jury, criminal trial, even civil), or even applying basic common sense analysis, on what well reasoned, justifiable grounds would Mrs. Scott"s 2015 restraining order against Mr. Scott not be relevant, not be considered, etc.? Readily acknowledging Mr. Scott's tragic death and widely disperate perspectives on the sad subject locally and nationally, on the basis of legal analysis or common sense, arguing Mrs. Scott's restraining order is irrelevant appears to be a giant uphill climb on a slippery ice covered precipice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2016, 01:35 PM
 
45,061 posts, read 17,902,619 times
Reputation: 18888
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
Detectives and other officers regularly wear plain clothes without being "undercover", but we're going down a rabbit hole, here.
He was not a detective. "Others" is meaningless.

CMPD has clearly stated that he was working undercover to catch drug dealers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2016, 01:36 PM
 
45,061 posts, read 17,902,619 times
Reputation: 18888
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feltdesigner View Post
who said the officer who didnt activate his camera was also the shooter?
You did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2016, 01:46 PM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
8,779 posts, read 7,960,459 times
Reputation: 3757
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
He was not a detective. "Others" is meaningless.

CMPD has clearly stated that he was working undercover to catch drug dealers.


If you say so.


You saw the part where the article clearly states it was someone else, not Vinson, they were talking about not activating his body cam, yes?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:



Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina > Charlotte
View detailed profiles of:
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top