![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 400,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 14,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads. Within the last few months our forum was cited in an article in 15 newspaper and in a story on AOL's homepage.| Search our forums (advanced): |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
the urban planning process? Like what happened in the 40's, 50's and up to the 70's was some master plan?
If your gonna point your anger somewhere point it in the direction of developers. There are very dedicated (and not rich) individuals working to make the whole metro area function better and to correct at least some of the mistakes of the past and to actually "plan" more in the future. (not to say it really is or was as bad anyway though, as you suggest) But you make it sound like its some diabolical plan, and zoning, codes, and laws and loopholes never existed and don't now....and that they are somehow static through time with some super suburb monsters pushing the buttons on some master planning machine housed somewhere in Schaumburg, that spits out directions to the rest of the metro. The urban planning "process" is made up of many people (citizens), government planners, non-government planners, the law, developers, the courts.....and what might be a code or a law in Berwyn might be totally different in another suburb. Scoffing in disgust from your perch in the city isn't helping the problem you seem so worried about. Look up CMAP ......at least most real planners know that the suburbs and the city are a whole....we need to work together for "planning" to occur and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see its not exactly easy to get things done overnight, right, or perfect given the amount of stakeholders in the "process" But just to let you know, there is also not a master transportation planner calling the shots somewhere from an oasis on I-94 talking about adding extra lanes and everyone's gonna have to just like it. Quote:
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
By "modern", I meant post WWII. Suburbia as we know it. And no, I'm not a fan of stuff put up from the 50s onward. The stuff early on wasnt great, but what we have now is the same concept except on steroids. And I totally agree that by and large developers are to blame.
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I don't know if you've noticed, but many city dwellers are dependent on automobiles as well. Why do you think it takes 2 hours to find a parking space in East Lakeview? |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The exurbs are so unsustainable, if you just think about it a little it makes sense. On a very simple level you have Americans who are just use to ditching what's old and building new. You have an exurb of 75,000 people covering 50 square miles. That's a horribly low population density. Sure it's fine when everything is new and doesn't need to be replaced, and you have good schools because of rich families and lots of money. Fast forward 50 years. Houses get old, people move on. Roads become old and all need to be resurfaced, utilities get old, schools get old. Now you have poorer people who can't pay horrid taxes to keep all of this upkeep when you're only having a few thousand people pay taxes for all this infrastructure. You just can't expect another 2 million people moving into Chicago in the next 25 years with another 1.5 million cars. We need to start building SMART communities that make sense - not bulldozing everything in sight with random housing tracts in every direction. It's not un-american, it's just common sense. Americans are obsessed with cars, and have been for decades. I think the current generation needs to realize that we're living on borrowed time as far as everyone having a car. You can't just have huge functional cities that keep adding hundreds of thousands of cars to the burbs every year. You can see travel times in LA and Atlanta start to really creep up to the point something needs to be done. What's being done is FINALLY a lot of urban infill and the huge growth of housing in the central city. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
That's actually really interesting given my situation. I have friends at work who went through what you went through, so I'm certainly not saying it's bad. People are people - we're all different. I've lived in Lakeview for the past 4 years and came from a burb (not of Chicago) and was ADDICTED to my car. Within a few months I grew to hate my car, as it was just as easy to grab a bus or train somewhere, and it cost so damn much, not to mention PARKING. I lived in a small place with my roommate, but we loved it. Made it our cozy little oasis where we could sit and do what we wanted and look out at the bustling city and people wander by at all hours. I absolutely LOVE the urbanity of the north side. I like riding public transit and walking the busy streets - just feeling like i'm part of a collective community. Growing up I couldn't imagine giving up my car, let alone riding a CITY BUS. Today though, I love being able to feel like I belong to something larger. I go home and my parents just drive everywhere, live in a suburb where the nearest neighbor is 200 feet away....it all seems so secluded. You see someone in your yard and your first reaction is startled/fear/confusion. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Look at Europe....Holland for instance, its almost entirely urban and "filled in" with large tracts of farms. The difference is they have excellent transportation systems.
There is no reason the suburbs and exurbs cannot be sustainable. The transportation systems are the problem. We need more trains with more connections, not just spokes to the city. We also need to preserve open space, and people need open space. Density and "building up" looks good on paper....but not neccessarily in reality. Cornfields are not exactly fully sustainable either, and are not the only use of land outside of the urban core. The suburbs may not have been expertly planned, but a lot of the resolution is not to abolish them, but to make them more walkable in themself, bikable, and to connect cities better (cities, meaning all of the urban cores of the suburbs and exurbs). This has already happened or improved SO much in the last few years. People get it and want that to happen . To look down one's nose at this situation does sound simply snobbish or uninformed. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think the State of IL should create an elevated rapid train sytem in the shape of a "C" that connects Highland Park - Arlington Heights - Wheaton - Naperville - Bollingbrook and Oak Lawn. The can pay for it by having a casino at every station.
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() Metra Connects : Proposed New Starts |
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|