|

04-10-2009, 11:07 PM
|
|
Gold Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The North
2,766 posts, read 1,714,759 times
Reputation: 861
|
|
|
Obviously, private all the way. The only thing public school will do for your child is set her foot on the wrong path.
|
|

04-11-2009, 10:09 AM
|
|
asdf jkl;
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Uptown, Chicago
7,079 posts, read 4,667,144 times
Reputation: 1059
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldhousegirl
I know I sure didn't want to spend $300k and get a house with a 1940's kitchen!
|
On the North Side I would kill for a $300K house with a 1940's kitchen. Anything at that price would be a teardown.
It's interesting to me that the declining south suburbs are just propping up real estate values in the western and northern suburbs. When you label an entire area "to be avoided", it raises price pressure elsewhere. Case in point: at the height of the boom, and bungalow sold for $900,000 in Ravenswood Manor, while similar houses can be found for less than a quarter of that elsewhere.
|
|

04-11-2009, 10:11 AM
|
|
asdf jkl;
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Uptown, Chicago
7,079 posts, read 4,667,144 times
Reputation: 1059
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by At1WithNature
Obviously, private all the way. The only thing public school will do for your child is set her foot on the wrong path.
|
Oh, come on. It so clearly depends on the individual school or district that this comment is really off base.
|
|

04-11-2009, 10:36 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chicago: Beverly, Woodlawn
1,392 posts, read 804,769 times
Reputation: 317
|
|
That's a good point. The same can be said for the south side of the city. Hyde Park is really pretty ridiculously expensive in my opinion. Same even for Bronzeville, Oakland, etc. and of course South Loop is predictably expensive. My Hyde Park realtor friend tells me that UofC faculty/staff who used to flee to Flossmoor in droves (for good schools and less grit, not to save money) now are either staying or tending toward Beverly. Those who want a more urban experience buy in the south Loop. Point is almost no one in this group is buying along the metra electric line south like they used to.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lookout Kid
On the North Side I would kill for a $300K house with a 1940's kitchen. Anything at that price would be a teardown.
It's interesting to me that the declining south suburbs are just propping up real estate values in the western and northern suburbs. When you label an entire area "to be avoided", it raises price pressure elsewhere. Case in point: at the height of the boom, and bungalow sold for $900,000 in Ravenswood Manor, while similar houses can be found for less than a quarter of that elsewhere.
|
|
|

04-11-2009, 12:10 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
24 posts, read 22,254 times
Reputation: 26
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajolotl
That's a good point. The same can be said for the south side of the city. Hyde Park is really pretty ridiculously expensive in my opinion. Same even for Bronzeville, Oakland, etc. and of course South Loop is predictably expensive. My Hyde Park realtor friend tells me that UofC faculty/staff who used to flee to Flossmoor in droves (for good schools and less grit, not to save money) now are either staying or tending toward Beverly. Those who want a more urban experience buy in the south Loop. Point is almost no one in this group is buying along the metra electric line south like they used to.
|
Which is funny because Flossmoor's demographics are very similar, the crime rate is lower, the average family income is over 31k higher, the public schools rate the same or higher, and the surrounding area crime rate is similar compared to Beverly (all info from the Chicago Tribune real estate section). Someone must be staying or moving there because the average family income is over 131K. The commute is probably similar too- I'm not sure on that one though.. HF high school still ranked in the top 25% schools in the Chicagoland area- I wouldn't write it off yet...
|
|

04-11-2009, 01:39 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chicago: Beverly, Woodlawn
1,392 posts, read 804,769 times
Reputation: 317
|
|
that's all true more or less, though a few details could be debated. beverly though has a relatively long history of stable integration, so people are less afraid that the area will change quickly. I know, it's circular, self-fulfilling logic, but that's unfortunatrly the way these things unfold.
beverly is also much closer to the action, for what it's worth, and the property taxes are much lower.
Quote:
Originally Posted by scotty40
Which is funny because Flossmoor's demographics are very similar, the crime rate is lower, the average family income is over 31k higher, the public schools rate the same or higher, and the surrounding area crime rate is similar compared to Beverly (all info from the Chicago Tribune real estate section). Someone must be staying or moving there because the average family income is over 131K. The commute is probably similar too- I'm not sure on that one though.. HF high school still ranked in the top 25% schools in the Chicagoland area- I wouldn't write it off yet...
|
|
|

04-11-2009, 04:42 PM
|
|
Not a member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: MIA
1,340 posts, read 584,147 times
Reputation: 450
|
|
|
That whole area reminds me of the scene from 'Back to the Future 2' when Biff takes over the city and the neighborhood transforms into a run down, crime ridden industrial area filled with crime and gangs. Diversity brings a mixed basket of furtunes, that's for sure.
|
|

04-11-2009, 04:58 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Harvey, IL
1,581 posts, read 938,331 times
Reputation: 454
|
|
|
Flossmoor is better. Diversity with nice large homes and upper middle class people. Flossmoor is similar to parts of Beverly in the city.
|
|

04-11-2009, 11:13 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
529 posts, read 432,502 times
Reputation: 159
|
|
|
I don't know for certain what the next 5 years or so hold for Flossmoor, but the major concern is high taxes and fair plus to good minus schools. Gorgeous homes of course, great walkable downtown, park district/activities and the libraries. But when you have 8k to 10k (and up) taxes on a 325k house, and downward trending schools that equals a problem.
Someone mentioned Olympia Fields, they have been known for a while for bad schools at all levels, particularly the high school. Granted a few small segments attend HF schools.
OP, I can't say with absolute certainty what other areas flood, but do know that Flossmoor is known for water problems. Do a search, and some of the community newsletters come up that discuss it. That's another big problem that often times can't be easily or cheaply fixed.
|
|

04-13-2009, 12:03 AM
|
|
asdf jkl;
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Uptown, Chicago
7,079 posts, read 4,667,144 times
Reputation: 1059
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuba libre
That whole area reminds me of the scene from 'Back to the Future 2' when Biff takes over the city and the neighborhood transforms into a run down, crime ridden industrial area filled with crime and gangs. Diversity brings a mixed basket of furtunes, that's for sure.
|
What whole area? Flossmoor? I don't think so. It still has the feel of a very genteel suburb.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|