|

05-31-2009, 04:09 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
26 posts, read 15,762 times
Reputation: 15
|
|
The worst thing about Chicago is...
...the suburbs. Seriously, I love Chicago but I feel the suburbs hold it back, especially after seeing that disaster played out between Bensenville and the O'Hare Modernization Program. That project would bring so many dollars into the Chicagoland area but Bensenville and Elk Grove ended up costing both sides millions of dollars and delays. Then again the lawyers are happy and Illinois is an attorney state.
It's not a simple of live and let live. The suburbs directly and indirectly hurt Chicago.
Anyone agree?
Last edited by TorontoExpat; 05-31-2009 at 04:44 AM..
Reason: edit... title should read worst, obviously.
|
|

05-31-2009, 11:06 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Chicago
4,323 posts, read 2,275,489 times
Reputation: 1662
|
|
|
I think all the Cook County suburbs should be annexed to Chicago. Not that it's likely to happen but other cites have expanded so; Lexington Ky and I think Indianapolis.
|
|

05-31-2009, 11:18 AM
|
|
Not a member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Chicago- Lawrence and Kedzie/Maywood
2,275 posts, read 1,059,759 times
Reputation: 513
|
|
|
Everyone thinks of Cook county as chicago anyway.
|
|

05-31-2009, 11:33 AM
|
|
We who are about to snark, salute you!
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oak Park, IL
2,873 posts, read 2,056,387 times
Reputation: 916
|
|
|
I used to think that way about the burbs too, back when I was a 312er (then 773er). Still, on the whole, I think the burbs are a net positive for the city of Chicago. You don't have nearly the degree of infighting between city and burb as in some other metro areas.
|
|

05-31-2009, 11:39 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
2,179 posts, read 1,450,712 times
Reputation: 932
|
|
|
No, the zombies. Definitely the walking fiends that clawed their way back from hell in defiance of God's will.
Also, Chicago's 'burbs aren't so bad. I'd say the worst thing about Chicago is that the city has to pay for the rest of the worthless state it's situated in.
|
|

05-31-2009, 12:14 PM
|
|
Rangers FC supporter
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Western Chicagoland
17,282 posts, read 19,059,642 times
Reputation: 4899
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TorontoExpat
...the suburbs. Seriously, I love Chicago but I feel the suburbs hold it back, especially after seeing that disaster played out between Bensenville and the O'Hare Modernization Program. That project would bring so many dollars into the Chicagoland area but Bensenville and Elk Grove ended up costing both sides millions of dollars and delays. Then again the lawyers are happy and Illinois is an attorney state.
It's not a simple of live and let live. The suburbs directly and indirectly hurt Chicago.
Anyone agree?
|
There are over 300 burbs in Chicago. Some are not desireable, some are amongst the best in the nation. Sounds like youre basing your ridiculous statement on a few suburbs. Without the burbs, Chicago would hurt. Without Chicago, the burbs would hurt. One hand washes the other in this case.
|
|

05-31-2009, 12:58 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bridgeport, Chicago
408 posts, read 293,011 times
Reputation: 72
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by coldwine
No, the zombies. Definitely the walking fiends that clawed their way back from hell in defiance of God's will.
Also, Chicago's 'burbs aren't so bad. I'd say the worst thing about Chicago is that the city has to pay for the rest of the worthless state it's situated in.
|
Shh, those below I-80 might come-a-fightin' 
|
|

05-31-2009, 01:01 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
269 posts, read 124,182 times
Reputation: 55
|
|
|
The suburbs are the worst thing affecting Chicago in many more ways than you can imagine. So I agree with the original poster. But I dont agree with the title "The worst thing about Chicago", hange it to "The worst thing affecting Chicago".
|
|

05-31-2009, 01:06 PM
|
|
The Piper at the Gates of Dawn
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Chicago
10,701 posts, read 6,905,524 times
Reputation: 1030
|
|
|
I am not falling for this.
|
|

05-31-2009, 04:22 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Cook County, IL
1,602 posts, read 1,015,096 times
Reputation: 461
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irishtom29
I think all the Cook County suburbs should be annexed to Chicago. Not that it's likely to happen but other cites have expanded so; Lexington Ky and I think Indianapolis.
|
Oh no. That then would make Chicago density decrease to the level of Houston. Some suburbs(the dense ones) have potential to be annexed by Chicago, but not all of them.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|