|

06-11-2009, 02:24 PM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
4 posts, read 2,196 times
Reputation: 10
|
|
In search of a non-suburban suburb.
People of city-data, I am in a pickle. My long-time girlfriend and future wife is considering purchasing a house while its still a buyers market, but can’t quite afford to spend what it’d cost to get a place in Chicago. Being broke, I have little to input in decision, but I’d like to live someplace I can be happy.
Now I don’t drive and am still in my twenties, so to me the stereotypical suburb is where dreams go to die, but I’m open to change and having a yard would be nice. I know they’re not all like that, but like damn near everyone I meet in Chicago I’m from Michigan and have no idea what areas outside the city have to offer. My only experiences have been far southern suburbs and Schaumburg, both of which may as be on Mars as far as I’m concerned as well as brief periods of time in Evanston and Oak Park, which seem nice, but are practically, if not more expensive than Chicago. Are there any other suburbs that offer at least some semblace of the city life I’ve come to love the last three years?
Identical McMansions and chain restaurants have been haunting my dreams. Please help.
|
|

06-11-2009, 02:45 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Evanston
213 posts, read 191,634 times
Reputation: 62
|
|
|
Since you haven't provided much in terms of locational or price preferences, a decent place to start would be the suburbs that are usually considered to have the "best" downtowns. That topic has been covered before, but a list of those suburbs would definitely include Evanston and Oak Park but would also probably include La Grange, Park Ridge, Naperville, Hinsdale, Highland Park, St. Charles, Homewood/Flossmoor, and Tinley Park. My guess is Hinsdale and Highland Park are too pricey for you (given your comments about Evanston and Oak Park). La Grange and Park Ridge have a wide range and may be worth investigating; the others, while hosting decent downtowns, would be a stretch to call urban.
|
|

06-11-2009, 02:47 PM
|
|
We who are about to snark, salute you!
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oak Park, IL
2,850 posts, read 1,953,646 times
Reputation: 905
|
|
|
If you liked Oak Park, look into Forest Park. There are inexpensive houses (less than 300k) within walking distance of the Blue line. The high school sucks, but you can move before that becomes an issue.
|
|

06-11-2009, 02:51 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berwyn, IL
990 posts, read 1,077,469 times
Reputation: 350
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Awesomenaut
People of city-data, I am in a pickle. My long-time girlfriend and future wife is considering purchasing a house while its still a buyers market, but can’t quite afford to spend what it’d cost to get a place in Chicago. Being broke, I have little to input in decision, but I’d like to live someplace I can be happy.
Now I don’t drive and am still in my twenties, so to me the stereotypical suburb is where dreams go to die, but I’m open to change and having a yard would be nice. I know they’re not all like that, but like damn near everyone I meet in Chicago I’m from Michigan and have no idea what areas outside the city have to offer. My only experiences have been far southern suburbs and Schaumburg, both of which may as be on Mars as far as I’m concerned as well as brief periods of time in Evanston and Oak Park, which seem nice, but are practically, if not more expensive than Chicago. Are there any other suburbs that offer at least some semblace of the city life I’ve come to love the last three years?
Identical McMansions and chain restaurants have been haunting my dreams. Please help.
|
Inner-ring -- Evergreen Park, Oak Lawn, Riverside, Berwyn, Forest Park, Oak Park, Evanston, etc. If you really want to gain some edgy pioneer bragging points, try out Cicero. That'll pretty much place you polar opposite of McMansion/chain restaurant suburbia without putting you in unreasonable danger like Harvey or Maywood would. You will be the envy of the anti-establishment types and maintain a reasonable degree of safety.
|
|

06-11-2009, 02:52 PM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
4 posts, read 2,196 times
Reputation: 10
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SloopyJ
Since you haven't provided much in terms of locational or price preferences, a decent place to start would be the suburbs that are usually considered to have the "best" downtowns. That topic has been covered before, but a list of those suburbs would definitely include Evanston and Oak Park but would also probably include La Grange, Park Ridge, Naperville, Hinsdale, Highland Park, St. Charles, Homewood/Flossmoor, and Tinley Park. My guess is Hinsdale and Highland Park are too pricey for you (given your comments about Evanston and Oak Park). La Grange and Park Ridge have a wide range and may be worth investigating; the others, while hosting decent downtowns, would be a stretch to call urban.
|
Thanks for the options, I'm off to the internet to look into these places.
As far as preferences go, she wants to spend less than $500k and the location doesn't matter much, as long as there's a Metra nearby and it's not in Indiana or Wisconsin.
We both work in the Loop/West Loop and are planning on relocating to a sunnier location once we move up the ladder in our respective fields so the school systems aren't of much interest for us.
|
|

06-11-2009, 08:35 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Evanston
213 posts, read 191,634 times
Reputation: 62
|
|
|
Look into La Grange Park also. It's located north of La Grange, is generally less expensive, and effectively shares the downtown area.
Have you considered outlying City neighborhoods? If the schools aren't a concern, you could do better in many parts of the City (e.g., northwest side neighborhoods) than in pricier suburbs.
|
|

06-11-2009, 08:49 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
86 posts, read 54,866 times
Reputation: 17
|
|
|
Anywhere you have blue line access will be great for the west loop commute. South Oak Park, Forest Park and North Berwyn are great options.
|
|

06-11-2009, 09:05 PM
|
|
Not a member
Status:
"Hits from the bong"
(set 28 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Chicago- Lawrence and Kedzie/Maywood
2,279 posts, read 976,384 times
Reputation: 510
|
|
|
Maywood, Melrose park
|
|

06-11-2009, 11:04 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Brookfield, Illinois
269 posts, read 130,096 times
Reputation: 98
|
|
|
wait, isn't North Berwyn the part of Berwyn that's going downhill? I thought South Berwyn was where the gorgeous Victorians are
|
|

06-12-2009, 08:51 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
111 posts, read 83,265 times
Reputation: 62
|
|
|
For for between 400-500K, you should be able to find a place in any of the inner ring suburbs mentioned--most of these suburbs have much more in common with the city than they do with, say, Schaumburg or Westmont. SInce schools (particularly high schools) aren't an issue, I'd look closely at Forest Park and Berwyn. You'll come in well under budget, have great access to the city, and get a nice home. Forest Park has more nightlife, Berwyn better housing stock, but either one would be a good fit. LaGrange, LaGrange Park, Riverside, North Riverside, Park Ridge are also great, but all have a more suburban feel (but again, not like a suburb further out).
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|