|

07-01-2009, 04:20 PM
|
|
Real Estate Agent
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: State of paranoia
820 posts, read 498,501 times
Reputation: 604
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drover
Chicken v. egg: which came first? Does improving the schools improve the character and culture of the city, or does improving the character and culture of the city improve the schools? You can have the best facilities and the brightest, most enthusiastic teachers and the finest curriculum, but none of that will matter if the kids are little sociopaths. That said, I don't know if that's the case in CCH or what the condition of the schools are there.
|
If you improve the schools - the rest will come. And it must be said that when I say "improve the schools" I don't mean throw more money at it and/or hire more qualified educators. Improving the quality of schools also means improve the quality of the kids as well.
Which goes back to parental involvement.
So at the heart of improving the schools IS the parents. They need to not only take a more active role in their children's education - but a bigger and more active role in the SCHOOL itself.
I never blamed anything on the teachers.
|
|

07-01-2009, 04:25 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chicago: Beverly, Woodlawn
1,392 posts, read 809,632 times
Reputation: 317
|
|
Better yet, send the kids to private school. If that's too expensive, just move. The schools cater to the lowest common denominator. I come from a family with many educators. Apparently at some point (70s) administrators became so afraid of lawsuits and accusations of racism that their hands are completely tied.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuckity
If you improve the schools - the rest will come. And it must be said that when I say "improve the schools" I don't mean throw more money at it and/or hire more qualified educators. Improving the quality of schools also means improve the quality of the kids as well.
Which goes back to parental involvement.
So at the heart of improving the schools IS the parents. They need to not only take a more active role in their children's education - but a bigger and more active role in the SCHOOL itself.
I never blamed anything on the teachers.
|
|
|

07-01-2009, 05:29 PM
|
|
There's beauty in the solace of not giving a damn.
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago
16,160 posts, read 12,537,749 times
Reputation: 4547
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuckity
If you improve the schools - the rest will come. And it must be said that when I say "improve the schools" I don't mean throw more money at it and/or hire more qualified educators. Improving the quality of schools also means improve the quality of the kids as well.
Which goes back to parental involvement.
So at the heart of improving the schools IS the parents. They need to not only take a more active role in their children's education - but a bigger and more active role in the SCHOOL itself.
|
Or, as ajolotl suggests, instead of fighting an entrenched bureaucracy and social pathologies that each have more inertia than Planet Jupiter, you could just move to a district that doesn't suck.
I get what you're saying and I agree, there needs to be parental involvement. But some districts actively chafe against it, and in other districts many parents just couldn't be arsed. Trying to change these factors is good and necessary, but by the time any significant progress is made, your kids will have already gone through their entire primary and high school education and the primary benefits will not accrue to them. When it comes to a choice between staying to "fight the good fight" and making sure my kid is properly educated, my kid's education comes first. If that means I pack up and leave, unfortunately that is what I'll do.
Of course, I'd like to see the whole stinking system overhauled altogether, but that's a whole different fight.
|
|

07-01-2009, 05:41 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berwyn, IL
990 posts, read 1,074,653 times
Reputation: 350
|
|
|
[quote=Drover;9559488]
I get what you're saying and I agree, there needs to be parental involvement. But some districts actively chafe against it, and in other districts many parents just couldn't be arsed. Trying to change these factors is good and necessary, but by the time any significant progress is made, your kids will have already gone through their entire primary and high school education and the primary benefits will not accrue to them.[quote]
Totally disagree. Your grandkids will have gone through their entire primary and high school education before there is any significant progress made if we rely on parental involvement within the existing system! It just isn't going to happen. As you say, there needs to be a complete overhaul. How is the big question.
|
|

07-01-2009, 05:42 PM
|
|
There's beauty in the solace of not giving a damn.
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago
16,160 posts, read 12,537,749 times
Reputation: 4547
|
|
^^ Put a slash in front of the second quote tag. 
|
|

07-02-2009, 12:02 AM
|
|
There are roads left in both of our shoes...
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SW Chicagoland
550 posts, read 187,104 times
Reputation: 97
|
|
Can't be bothered
Chuckity: I actually never said you blamed anything on the teachers...reread for me please.
I actually believe different people need to move here. Better people. Then we will have the manpower to overhaul the schools.
Last edited by deechee; 07-02-2009 at 12:06 AM..
Reason: different opinion
|
|

07-13-2009, 03:29 PM
|
|
Not a member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Lynwood,IL
283 posts, read 183,831 times
Reputation: 79
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by deechee
Chuckity: I actually never said you blamed anything on the teachers...reread for me please.
I actually believe different people need to move here. Better people. Then we will have the manpower to overhaul the schools.
|

|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|