|

03-27-2008, 12:00 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
1,375 posts, read 1,062,936 times
Reputation: 324
|
|
|
How much longer before Rockford is considered part of Metro Chicago?....and elsewhere. That's what the growth is about, the outlying areas and towns, and even other states considered part of the Metro area.
|
|

03-27-2008, 12:28 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Humboldt Park, Chicago
1,458 posts, read 1,150,722 times
Reputation: 329
|
|
Rockford and Chicago
So long as there are corn fields in Belvidere, Huntley, and DeKalb it may be awhile before Rockford is part of the Chicago metro. I think the Chicago metro pretty much extends west to Route 47 at this point. It used to end at Randall Road 5 years ago. (A friend of mine got a speeding ticket for going 99 mph there in 2002, you couldn't do that now if you tried with all the lights and the traffic). There is alot of corn around the area between Randall and Route 47 (some even on Randall Road) now. I have also noticed that developments in that area have slowed.
I know the commercial banking community is in no hurry to issue new credit facilities to builders who are building houses that may drop in value (not like in CA or FL, but values are going down slightly in Chicago metro).
|
|

03-27-2008, 01:54 PM
|
|
asdf jkl;
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Uptown, Chicago
7,014 posts, read 4,459,222 times
Reputation: 1040
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fishtacos
How much longer before Rockford is considered part of Metro Chicago?....and elsewhere. That's what the growth is about, the outlying areas and towns, and even other states considered part of the Metro area.
|
The Census tracks information on employment, commuting, and other economic factors. They have a forumla used to compute metro areas, and it is related to the economic dependency and commuting patterns of a town's residents. This is why Kenosha is considered part of the Chicago metro area and Racine is part of Milwaukee's--even though they are just minutes apart. And as long as Rockford maintains some economic and commuting independence from metro Chicago, it will be counted seperately.
|
|

03-27-2008, 03:04 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
560 posts, read 354,971 times
Reputation: 95
|
|
|
AP story just out. Chicago is on the top 10 hotspot list for population growth. Note Dallas had the most growth:
4 Texas Cities Among Top 10 in Growth - AOL News (broken link)
|
|

03-27-2008, 03:10 PM
|
|
We who are about to snark, salute you!
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oak Park, IL
2,840 posts, read 1,857,242 times
Reputation: 892
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsimicata
AP story just out. Chicago is on the top 10 hotspot list for population growth. Note Dallas had the most growth:
4 Texas Cities Among Top 10 in Growth - AOL News (broken link)
|
Very interesting. It'd be interesting to see a link to the original US census data. It'd be even better if someone could arrange the data in a graphical format, maybe using one of those pictograms. 
|
|

03-27-2008, 04:38 PM
|
|
Rangers FC supporter
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Western Chicagoland
16,940 posts, read 17,601,635 times
Reputation: 4738
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sukwoo
Very interesting. It'd be interesting to see a link to the original US census data. It'd be even better if someone could arrange the data in a graphical format, maybe using one of those pictograms. 
|
The Trib had a small graph today, illustrating growth of the top 10 cities, but nothing too elaborate. 
|
|

03-27-2008, 05:48 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
1,375 posts, read 1,062,936 times
Reputation: 324
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lookout Kid
The Census tracks information on employment, commuting, and other economic factors. They have a forumla used to compute metro areas, and it is related to the economic dependency and commuting patterns of a town's residents. This is why Kenosha is considered part of the Chicago metro area and Racine is part of Milwaukee's--even though they are just minutes apart. And as long as Rockford maintains some economic and commuting independence from metro Chicago, it will be counted seperately.
|
I was just having some fun.
|
|

03-27-2008, 06:09 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North Shore
338 posts, read 183,692 times
Reputation: 114
|
|
|
I donno....all this growth has consequences... we'll see.
|
|

03-28-2008, 08:05 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
337 posts, read 182,248 times
Reputation: 102
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CHICAGOLAND92
In 2000, the population was 2,896,016.
The 2006 estimate (according to City-Data) was 2,833,321.
Does anyone else find this suprising, since there is a lot of gentrification happening around the city, as well as many condos being built downtown?
|
Because the weather and city/county government all suck.
|
|

03-30-2008, 10:47 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cincinnati via Chicago...Michigan next?
832 posts, read 467,907 times
Reputation: 241
|
|
|
For me, the cost of living was too high. I was born and raised on the south side in Beverly and after college I didn't want to move back in with my parents but I couldnt afford a place on my own. So I moved to Cincinnati for a job offer and now I live in the most expensive area in town, with a view of the river and the kentucky hills AND I'm 7 minutes from downtown and Im only paying $625 for a huge two bedroom apartment. The dont tax on food at grocery stores or restaurants and gas is very cheap. I would love to move back home but I doubt I ever will since I cant afford it. The closest I will probably get to home is Michigan and with their economy, I dont see that happening either...
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|