Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-21-2015, 09:27 AM
 
17,183 posts, read 22,916,488 times
Reputation: 17478

Advertisements

The Chicago public school district population has 85% of its students in poverty. The total number of students is 400,545 as of the 2013/2014 school year. Most middle class parents do not send their kids to the public schools even if they live in the city. I love the Reader article's idea - reduce poverty and you will end up with better schools.

http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago...t?oid=11526214

Quote:
All this suggests a different approach for improving Chicago's public schools. Rather than concentrating on raising test scores, school and city officials should focus on sharply reducing CPS's low-income proportion. Do that, and test scores and graduation rates will take care of themselves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-21-2015, 03:22 PM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,185,348 times
Reputation: 29983
I ask again, did this 85% poverty rate start just yesterday or something? What was the poverty rate before it became routine to close schools because it was cold outside? How many kids lost fingers and toes to frostbite when they still had to go to school even when it was cold ? How does it affect impoverished parents who have to miss yet another day of work because the school district has decided for them that it's not safe for their kid to be outside? Or are they being left at home by themselves because their impoverished parent(s) can ill-afford to keep taking hits on their paychecks -- and if so, are we really providing those kids a net safety benefit?

Here's another suggestion the Reader would probably never consider: stop accommodating the values that contribute to poverty and crappy schools and start holding parents accountable to do the very basic things they're obligated to do to take care of their kids.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2015, 01:51 PM
 
4,633 posts, read 3,465,808 times
Reputation: 6322
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drover View Post
Here's another suggestion the Reader would probably never consider: stop accommodating the values that contribute to poverty and crappy schools and start holding parents accountable to do the very basic things they're obligated to do to take care of their kids.

What are "values that contribute to poverty"? Never heard that one before, and I'm interested to know what this concept entails.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:06 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top