Quote:
Originally Posted by JCL01
I see that point of view.
I think it might be good, first, though to define exactly what is meant by "negative effects" specifically...
First in my mind would be that the poor lose out...but, this isn't really particular to this issue. The poor always lose out.
The other would be that certain people's aesthetic sense (or however you would like to label it) is offended. As I've stated, I'm not particularly sympathetic to the idea that this is really a particularly negative effect.
What are the other negative effects you would add?
|
I couldn't care less about the aesthetics of gentrification. I'm probably best classified as a yuppie, and I like Starbucks too. I'm a big believer in capitalism, and also a big believer that no one is entitled to a neighborhood.
That being said, its a little to easy to say that the poor always lose out (so no big deal). Why do the poor lose out? Partly (not entirely), its because the playing field is unnecessarily stacked against them. I'm not talking about the drug dealers and gangbangers (Screw 'em). I'm talking about the law-abiding poor, the ones who play by the rules.
Granted, as you say, this is not specific to gentrification and more of an issue for the Politics & other controversies forum, so I'll stop.