U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 06-21-2009, 09:12 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chicago: Beverly, Woodlawn
1,392 posts, read 805,191 times
Reputation: 317
ajolotl is a jewel in the roughajolotl is a jewel in the roughajolotl is a jewel in the roughajolotl is a jewel in the roughajolotl is a jewel in the roughajolotl is a jewel in the roughajolotl is a jewel in the rough
The Times has an article today on the destruction of the final housing project in Atlanta (Atlanta is the first city apparently to destroy all of its centralized public housing). I'm an avid Times reader but the article illustrates perfectly what frustrates me about that paper sometimes -- the two sides of the argument presented are "good for poor people to not be around only other poor people" vs. "unfair to make poor people move". Never was the negative effect on stable middle-class communities mentioned. I guess the Times is too PC to discuss that.

While I think it is obviously ridiculous to go so far as to say that Section 8 has ruined the country, that argument of the negative impact on stable communities should be addressed by any reasonable analysis.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-21-2009, 09:51 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Columbus,Ohio
537 posts, read 233,845 times
Reputation: 96
otters21 will become famous soon enoughotters21 will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajolotl View Post
The Times has an article today on the destruction of the final housing project in Atlanta (Atlanta is the first city apparently to destroy all of its centralized public housing). I'm an avid Times reader but the article illustrates perfectly what frustrates me about that paper sometimes -- the two sides of the argument presented are "good for poor people to not be around only other poor people" vs. "unfair to make poor people move". Never was the negative effect on stable middle-class communities mentioned. I guess the Times is too PC to discuss that.

While I think it is obviously ridiculous to go so far as to say that Section 8 has ruined the country, that argument of the negative impact on stable communities should be addressed by any reasonable analysis.
I agree with you that section 8 had negative impacts on stable thriving areas and that most certainly needs to be addressed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2009, 06:52 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: South Side
2,446 posts, read 1,781,629 times
Reputation: 503
Manigault is a glorious beacon of lightManigault is a glorious beacon of lightManigault is a glorious beacon of lightManigault is a glorious beacon of lightManigault is a glorious beacon of lightManigault is a glorious beacon of lightManigault is a glorious beacon of lightManigault is a glorious beacon of lightManigault is a glorious beacon of lightManigault is a glorious beacon of light
Folks want to isolate poor people in 'concentrated, high-rise projects'? I think Section 8 is far superior to us re-building new Robert Taylor's or Pruitt-Igoes. At this point our society sure knows what does not work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2009, 09:21 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
347 posts, read 223,211 times
Reputation: 119
promis1 will become famous soon enoughpromis1 will become famous soon enoughpromis1 will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manigault View Post
Folks want to isolate poor people in 'concentrated, high-rise projects'? I think Section 8 is far superior to us re-building new Robert Taylor's or Pruitt-Igoes. At this point our society sure knows what does not work.
Right, so instead spread the vermon and criminals all over nice neighborhoods and make all the good, hard working residents deal with these problems. Gee, that sounds fair.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2009, 09:24 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chicago: Beverly, Woodlawn
1,392 posts, read 805,191 times
Reputation: 317
ajolotl is a jewel in the roughajolotl is a jewel in the roughajolotl is a jewel in the roughajolotl is a jewel in the roughajolotl is a jewel in the roughajolotl is a jewel in the roughajolotl is a jewel in the rough
Yes, quite a few folks would like to go back to that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manigault View Post
Folks want to isolate poor people in 'concentrated, high-rise projects'?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2009, 09:41 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
37 posts, read 10,621 times
Reputation: 27
anoroc is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by promis1 View Post
But look at statistics- almost all of the gangbangers and thugs are black and hispanic- lets not sugar coat this.

All of the big three had white male CEOs, so white men can't run car companies. "Let's not sugar coat this." See how foolish that sounds.


Please remember all rectangles are not squares. Maybe because of your thinking is why programs such as section 8 exist. If people did not discriminate and prejudge more individuals would have a fair shot at life.



I take it you would not want to live near someone with section 8 assistance. If you were in position would you offer a job to that same individual?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2009, 10:23 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Marquette Gardens, Joliet, IL
375 posts, read 269,114 times
Reputation: 66
ManheimMadman will become famous soon enoughManheimMadman will become famous soon enough
Maybe this is not particular to the thread, but I have a question...

What did people do before section 8 and government assistance? Has the government always supported the poor? Was there ever a time that it was your own damn prerogative to find a place to live and warm meal? Isn't this what the community and family is for?

I'm not saying government assistance is right or wrong- just asking a question. If Section 8 were to not be in existence, where would all these people go? Be bums roaming the streets?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2009, 10:32 PM
ichigo ichie 1 time 1 meeting unprecedented
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: southern california
26,827 posts, read 10,271,517 times
Reputation: 17192
Huckleberry3911948 has a reputation beyond reputeHuckleberry3911948 has a reputation beyond reputeHuckleberry3911948 has a reputation beyond reputeHuckleberry3911948 has a reputation beyond reputeHuckleberry3911948 has a reputation beyond reputeHuckleberry3911948 has a reputation beyond reputeHuckleberry3911948 has a reputation beyond reputeHuckleberry3911948 has a reputation beyond reputeHuckleberry3911948 has a reputation beyond repute
Huckleberry3911948 has a reputation beyond reputeHuckleberry3911948 has a reputation beyond reputeHuckleberry3911948 has a reputation beyond reputeHuckleberry3911948 has a reputation beyond reputeHuckleberry3911948 has a reputation beyond reputeHuckleberry3911948 has a reputation beyond reputeHuckleberry3911948 has a reputation beyond reputeHuckleberry3911948 has a reputation beyond reputeHuckleberry3911948 has a reputation beyond reputeHuckleberry3911948 has a reputation beyond reputeHuckleberry3911948 has a reputation beyond reputeHuckleberry3911948 has a reputation beyond reputeHuckleberry3911948 has a reputation beyond reputeHuckleberry3911948 has a reputation beyond reputeHuckleberry3911948 has a reputation beyond reputeHuckleberry3911948 has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by anoroc View Post
All of the big three had white male CEOs, so white men can't run car companies. "Let's not sugar coat this." See how foolish that sounds.


Please remember all rectangles are not squares. Maybe because of your thinking is why programs such as section 8 exist. If people did not discriminate and prejudge more individuals would have a fair shot at life.



I take it you would not want to live near someone with section 8 assistance. If you were in position would you offer a job to that same individual?
no worse than saying if the CEO's were black the car companies would have no problems.
if it were me i would be far more concerned about black flight --that is the affuent well educated successful black people leaving chicago.
this does far more harm than the "gentrification people" packing up.
people dont move bek they are offended by skin tone--- they move because they are offended by violence.
a chicago native.
and former resident
s side cicero.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2009, 10:41 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Old Town
1,558 posts, read 643,301 times
Reputation: 330
surlycue is a jewel in the roughsurlycue is a jewel in the roughsurlycue is a jewel in the roughsurlycue is a jewel in the roughsurlycue is a jewel in the roughsurlycue is a jewel in the roughsurlycue is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huckleberry3911948 View Post
people dont move bek they are offended by skin tone--- they move because
Which came first, the chicken or the egg? Examples of your theory can be found just as examples of white people picking up and moving at the first sight of a black face on their block can be found. Whites definitely seem more prone to move when blacks move in than when Puerto Ricans and Mexicans do, though, and the latter can also bring gangs and violence in to previously safe neighborhoods.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2009, 09:34 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
37 posts, read 10,621 times
Reputation: 27
anoroc is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huckleberry3911948 View Post
no worse than saying if the CEO's were black the car companies would have no problems.
if it were me i would be far more concerned about black flight --that is the affuent well educated successful black people leaving chicago.
this does far more harm than the "gentrification people" packing up.
people dont move bek they are offended by skin tone--- they move because they are offended by violence.
a chicago native.
and former resident
s side cicero.
[SIZE=3]From my understanding “flight” in this sense means to escape. Also you’re inferring that the same race is solely responsible for those in their group who are less fortunate instead of the entire population (no one should be).[/SIZE]
[SIZE=3] [/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]Lastly, I do not believe middle class blacks “escape” from other blacks. Actually it seems they look for areas that have a sizable black population when moving becomes an option.[/SIZE]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:31 AM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top