Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-12-2009, 11:14 PM
 
Location: Chicago
15,585 posts, read 27,516,196 times
Reputation: 1761

Advertisements

^Below is the link for this info^

Chicago Spire developer in talks with AFL-CIO for funding - Chicago Tribune
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-13-2009, 07:19 AM
 
Location: Chicago - mudhole in the prairie...
1,624 posts, read 3,282,148 times
Reputation: 262
Quote:
Originally Posted by sukwoo View Post
Most of the supertalls are being built for ego-boosting purposes rather than true economic necessity. America has long outgrown the need for ego boosting via supertall construction. When we're in need of ego-boosting, we invade other countries instead.

That's sad but true.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2009, 08:45 AM
 
11,973 posts, read 31,704,065 times
Reputation: 4644
Quote:
Originally Posted by surlycue View Post
Some of the workers unions (construction/plumbing, etc) are in talks to put their money behind it to get it started again and keep them employed through 2011 but it would literally be their money, as in 401K or equivalent so if I were them I would want some serious guarantees of return compensation before throwing my future away on a pipe dream.
That sounds like a really bad idea to me. I wouldn't want to bet the farm on getting $1200/square foot in Chicago--and that's what the developer's profits depended on. When Trump was in the feasibility study stage, people were going crazy over $900/square foot--and that's a much better location as far as I'm concerned.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2009, 08:54 AM
 
Location: Passed out on the trail to Hanakapi'ai
1,657 posts, read 4,062,015 times
Reputation: 1323
If it is completed, I would buy a two bedroom.

Just saying
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2009, 09:51 AM
 
1,251 posts, read 2,507,160 times
Reputation: 896
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carantini View Post
no one wants that giant penis shaped thing
Wrong
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2009, 10:28 AM
 
28,455 posts, read 85,132,888 times
Reputation: 18726
Default Make no small plans...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lookout Kid View Post
That sounds like a really bad idea to me. I wouldn't want to bet the farm on getting $1200/square foot in Chicago--and that's what the developer's profits depended on. When Trump was in the feasibility study stage, people were going crazy over $900/square foot--and that's a much better location as far as I'm concerned.
I have to admit that it is ONE HELLA GOOD looking building and the site is perfect to have something like this. You don't go to an art museum to see a masterpiece right up against a lavatory sign. Calatrava is gifted, and Gelleher has the brains and money to see this thing through almost anything. Shelbourne Development: Our People Past Projects - The Chicago Spire.

You don't get to the position of either of these guys by burning through cash. They have done a lot of the stuff that lenders and buyers will need to move forward, Construction News - The Chicago Spire.

I think that a five year time line is not unreasonable at all for project like this.

Trump has a whole different kind of model of how he wanted to finance his place on the former SunTimes site, and I think he is less able to weather the more fickle part of the market that he targets, but I agree it is in some ways easier to pull off / different kind of site. Better is relative...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2009, 02:29 PM
 
11,973 posts, read 31,704,065 times
Reputation: 4644
Quote:
Originally Posted by chet everett View Post
They have done a lot of the stuff that lenders and buyers will need to move forward, Construction News - The Chicago Spire.

I think that a five year time line is not unreasonable at all for project like this.
For now this project is dead. Both architects (Calatrava and Perkins & Will) have filed liens against the developer, and I've heard from insiders that no further development of drawings is happening. I'd be shocked to see this one come back to life in it's present form. But that doesn't mean I wouldn't love to see it happen!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2009, 02:44 PM
 
28,455 posts, read 85,132,888 times
Reputation: 18726
LK:

I think you know that is not uncommon for architecture firms and their clients to dispute who is supposed to get paid when and for what. No doubt Kelleher stopped writing checks when the banks took away his pen. If can get a new source of funding from the pension funds (who have a tradition of being equity partners on some kinds of large long term projects) do you really think that the P+W and Calatrava would not start-up the drawings servers?

This is thing is a lot 'fresher' than Block 37 and a lot less troubled than other MUCH simpler high rises not far from the site. The "fat lady" is not even warmed up on this...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2009, 02:58 PM
 
11,973 posts, read 31,704,065 times
Reputation: 4644
Quote:
Originally Posted by chet everett View Post
LK:

I think you know that is not uncommon for architecture firms and their clients to dispute who is supposed to get paid when and for what. No doubt Kelleher stopped writing checks when the banks took away his pen. If can get a new source of funding from the pension funds (who have a tradition of being equity partners on some kinds of large long term projects) do you really think that the P+W and Calatrava would not start-up the drawings servers?

This is thing is a lot 'fresher' than Block 37 and a lot less troubled than other MUCH simpler high rises not far from the site. The "fat lady" is not even warmed up on this...
I don't see the market for that coming back any time soon. I have a feeling that whatever gets built there will be scaled back a bit. But of course, I don't have a crystal ball! I'm just skeptical.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2009, 09:39 PM
 
Location: Logan Square
1,912 posts, read 5,430,846 times
Reputation: 510
Your quarterly Spire update: Will the Irish government take on the Spire's loan? » Blog Archive » YoChicago

This is a current "update" (since it really doesn't include much new information) on the fate of the Spire.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top