|

04-30-2009, 11:54 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
821 posts, read 388,500 times
Reputation: 120
|
|
Chi area poor to grow by 250,000
a 27% increase in the past two years. thats some crazy stuff; bu it do wonder what they mean by chicago area residents and poor how do they define it cause it might not be that bad
|
|

04-30-2009, 12:41 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
267 posts, read 125,391 times
Reputation: 171
|
|
|
LOL @ the American standard of "poor".
IMO, it should be mandatory that all persons, upon reaching the age of 21, travel to at least two other continents (of their choosing) prior to be granted full American citizenship. It just makes me want to puke that we have "poor" who are driving 2008 model cars, have flat-screen TVs and eat out three times a week.
Yes, there are genuinely poor people and I am pretty sympathetic to their sufferings (to a point), but whenever statistics like this come out, there's an underlying truth that is just offensive.
|
|

04-30-2009, 12:45 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chicago: Beverly, Woodlawn
1,392 posts, read 804,489 times
Reputation: 317
|
|
I agree. Anyone who has plumbing, heat, electricity, something to eat, and a school to send their kids to is doing pretty well in the bigger scheme of things. I don't feel too sorry for anyone in this country.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerPlayer1
LOL @ the American standard of "poor".
IMO, it should be mandatory that all persons, upon reaching the age of 21, travel to at least two other continents (of their choosing) prior to be granted full American citizenship. It just makes me want to puke that we have "poor" who are driving 2008 model cars, have flat-screen TVs and eat out three times a week.
Yes, there are genuinely poor people and I am pretty sympathetic to their sufferings (to a point), but whenever statistics like this come out, there's an underlying truth that is just offensive.
|
|
|

04-30-2009, 01:05 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Andersonville, Chicago
109 posts, read 53,811 times
Reputation: 51
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiMack
a 27% increase in the past two years. thats some crazy stuff; bu it do wonder what they mean by chicago area residents and poor how do they define it cause it might not be that bad
|
Urban sociologists define "poor" as living under the federal poverty line. The poverty line is the minimum level of income deemed necessary to sustain an adequate standard of living in any given country, which includes the cost of food, clothing, shelter, sanitation, education, health care and other basic needs.
In 2009, a single person living under the federal poverty line makes less than $10,830 a year; a family of 3 makes less than $18,310; and a family of 4 makes less than $22,050.
2009 Federal Poverty Guidelines
|
|

04-30-2009, 02:29 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Chicago, IL USA
428 posts, read 359,551 times
Reputation: 122
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by binarybelle
Urban sociologists define "poor" as living under the federal poverty line. The poverty line is the minimum level of income deemed necessary to sustain an adequate standard of living in any given country, which includes the cost of food, clothing, shelter, sanitation, education, health care and other basic needs.
In 2009, a single person living under the federal poverty line makes less than $10,830 a year; a family of 3 makes less than $18,310; and a family of 4 makes less than $22,050.
2009 Federal Poverty Guidelines
|
Of course, the biggest problem with the Federal poverty line is that it fails to take into account the vast differences in cost of living (particularly housing) in various regions of the country. That's why I, for one, find it rather meaningless.
|
|

04-30-2009, 02:53 PM
|
|
asdf jkl;
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Uptown, Chicago
7,079 posts, read 4,665,343 times
Reputation: 1059
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiMack
a 27% increase in the past two years. thats some crazy stuff; bu it do wonder what they mean by chicago area residents and poor how do they define it cause it might not be that bad
|
You need to start posting sources.
|
|

04-30-2009, 03:52 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: West Columbia, SC
393 posts, read 180,757 times
Reputation: 86
|
|
|
If 250,000 people move below the poverty line in a metro area of 8 million, how is that 27%?
|
|

04-30-2009, 03:58 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: San Diego
4,863 posts, read 1,757,704 times
Reputation: 990
|
|
|
|
|

04-30-2009, 04:01 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Evanston
729 posts, read 386,046 times
Reputation: 171
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Intergalactic
If 250,000 people move below the poverty line in a metro area of 8 million, how is that 27%?
|
I was at a luncheon yesterday for an urban planning organization and they say the population of Chicagoland will be 13 million by 2040. 
|
|

04-30-2009, 04:26 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chicago: Beverly, Woodlawn
1,392 posts, read 804,489 times
Reputation: 317
|
|
x + 250000 = 1.27x
x = 25000/.27 = 925,925
So, there were 925,925 poor people. It increased 27% (or 250K) to 1,175,924. Does that seem wrong for some reason?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Intergalactic
If 250,000 people move below the poverty line in a metro area of 8 million, how is that 27%?
|
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|