|

11-04-2009, 01:02 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
241 posts, read 98,292 times
Reputation: 63
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by edsg25
OK, SJaye, I'm going to ask you to look at your words above that I highlighted.
Then I'm going to ask you to think about one word:
WATER
* tons of it
* all fresh
* filling 5 huge, huge lakes
* which really aren't lakes at all, but more like inland seas
* at a time when the world seems to be running out of it, at least from the perspective of access and usability
* and a growing and growing national and global population are demanding more and more of it
* and consider its real value even against the likes of gold and oil
Pulled down by the region around it? Hardly. Just ask yourself given the global environmental and demographic issues today....
when it comes to being in the right location based on the most needed and necessary and essential of resources, which would you choose to be: Los Angeles, Las Vegas, Phoenix, Houston, Miami, Atlanta.......or Chicago.
I'll let you figure out my answer to that question. 
|
I am not convinced that there is going to be a water crisis. People are always predicting some kind of crisis, especially environmentalists. They are a group of people that has lost me over the past decade. Food crises, energy crises, etc. are always being predicted, and I have read that they have been predicted consistently for at least a hundred years, and none of them have actually happened. Reference- Book The Population Bomb (1968), Documentary After The Warming (1989). Both sets of predictions were nowhere near what actually happened in the twenty years that followed!
|
|

11-04-2009, 01:26 PM
|
|
asdf jkl;
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Uptown, Chicago
7,212 posts, read 4,975,989 times
Reputation: 1084
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SJaye
I am not convinced that there is going to be a water crisis. People are always predicting some kind of crisis, especially environmentalists. They are a group of people that has lost me over the past decade. Food crises, energy crises, etc. are always being predicted, and I have read that they have been predicted consistently for at least a hundred years, and none of them have actually happened. Reference- Book The Population Bomb (1968), Documentary After The Warming (1989). Both sets of predictions were nowhere near what actually happened in the twenty years that followed!
|
They did predict that U.S. domestic oil production would peak in the early 70s, and then decline from the top of that bell curve. And that's exactly what happened. Scientists don't just make this stuff up. Sure, sometimes they are wrong. But sometimes they are also right.
|
|

11-04-2009, 01:28 PM
|
|
asdf jkl;
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Uptown, Chicago
7,212 posts, read 4,975,989 times
Reputation: 1084
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oakparkdude
I actually think the decline of places like South Bend may (in the short term) benefit Chicago. Chicago has done very well by sucking up talent and jobs that in the past would have gone to smaller midwestern metros. In effect, if you want a vibrant big city experience, Chicago is really the only choice in the Midwest.
|
Some might also point to Minneapolis. I personally don't like it much, but it does have a pretty good white collar economy with a lot of "creative class" industries. Note that in Chicago you meet a LOT of transplants from Michigan and Ohio, but very few from the Twin Cities.
|
|

11-04-2009, 01:36 PM
|
|
There's beauty in the solace of not giving a damn.
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago
16,514 posts, read 13,267,211 times
Reputation: 4835
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by edsg25
Realistically exactly how low can any mid-sized city go when it contains a major, influencial research university.
|
Been to New Haven lately?
|
|

11-04-2009, 01:43 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
478 posts, read 210,790 times
Reputation: 57
|
|
umm
Having lived in the Twin Cities, I meet a lot of their transplants to Chicago. They are everywhere and Minneapolis families own several downtown Chicago bars just like the reverse is true. Minneapolis is nice, but no one significantly living in both would say Minneapolis is better.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lookout Kid
Some might also point to Minneapolis. I personally don't like it much, but it does have a pretty good white collar economy with a lot of "creative class" industries. Note that in Chicago you meet a LOT of transplants from Michigan and Ohio, but very few from the Twin Cities.
|
|
|

11-04-2009, 01:48 PM
|
|
We who are about to snark, salute you!
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oak Park, IL
2,873 posts, read 2,058,392 times
Reputation: 916
|
|
|
|
|

11-04-2009, 04:20 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
241 posts, read 98,292 times
Reputation: 63
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lookout Kid
They did predict that U.S. domestic oil production would peak in the early 70s, and then decline from the top of that bell curve. And that's exactly what happened. Scientists don't just make this stuff up. Sure, sometimes they are wrong. But sometimes they are also right.
|
I understand, but I feel like they are most likely correct when they are not sounding the alarm in something that appears somewhat emotionally driven. Something like the need for water treatment facilities, for example, comes across as a rational concern about overall public health. Nobody appears to be blowing up in tears and making films about the end of the world as we know it regarding this, they just state that we will have better health if we treat our water more thoroughly before allowing it to enter the water supply. The global warming hysteria, as well as water crisis, and other crisis predictions appear more emotional in nature, and remind me of all these incorrect predictions in the past, including stuff like Y2K, as there was theoretically a scientific reason why some of the predicted events would happen, but people took it to an emotional extreme.
Either way, I don't think my statement that I was concerned about Chicago's success being somewhat hampered by the relative failures of cities around them warranted this response, which comes across as elitist to me!
"OK, SJaye, I'm going to ask you to look at your words above that I highlighted.
Then I'm going to ask you to think about one word:"
|
|

11-04-2009, 05:32 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
769 posts, read 322,775 times
Reputation: 310
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drover
Been to New Haven lately?
|
No. But I know it has its troubles and know it would be a lot worse without Yale.
|
|

11-04-2009, 05:58 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Chicago - Logan Square
684 posts, read 552,174 times
Reputation: 161
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by edsg25
No. But I know it has its troubles and know it would be a lot worse without Yale.
|
Without Yale it would be Fall River.
|
|

11-04-2009, 06:56 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bethesda, MD
651 posts, read 434,988 times
Reputation: 329
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by movingsomewhere
Oh and do read my other topic at the Baltimore Forum about Chicago. People wanting to move in Chicago will be disappointed unless you make 100-150K a year (maybe). If you make more than that, why even consider this toilet?
Read on...
The Decline of Chicago: The City that Doesn't Work
The Decline of Chicago: The City that Doesn't Work | Newgeography.com
|
This "article" is perhaps one of the dumbest things I have ever read. It mentions the low enrollment of white children in Chicago Public Schools and the lack of Wal-Marts in the city as what's bringing the city down. The Enquirer could do a better job than this trash.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|