U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-01-2010, 04:39 AM
 
Location: Chicago
3,368 posts, read 3,577,650 times
Reputation: 2742

Advertisements

Chicago River vs. Lake Michigan

Maybe it's time to make an assessment on where the two stand in relationship with each other.

A mere half century back, Chicago was indeed The City on the Lake. Its river was a sewer running through it, perhaps best symbolized by the Civic Opera's blank "backside" facing its banks. Outside of downtown, the river was an industrial wasteland.

All that contrasts today. The riverfront is prime property. Ask Trump. Wacker Boulevard has been transformed. The river walk grows and prospers, hurt only by the economy. the north and south branches have sprung high end residential close to the Loop. Some of the most iconic photos of our city show off what is by far the most humanly canyonized river in the world.

During the last 50 years, of course, the lakefront hasn't skipped a beat and continues to grow and improve. But the dramatic rise of the Chicago River has given us a two prong waterfront and both....lake and river...among the most dramatic in the nation or the world.

So how about it? when we look at today's Chicago, is this still the City by the Lake or is there any equity in saying Chicago is the City by the Lake and on the River?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-01-2010, 07:46 AM
 
Location: Chicago
4,512 posts, read 6,735,217 times
Reputation: 2719
Sure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2010, 10:09 AM
 
Location: Denver, CO
818 posts, read 1,418,464 times
Reputation: 322
Interesting question. My hunch is that although attitudes towards the Chicago River are changing, we still are the city by the Lake. My reasoning is that very few cities in the US, especially in the Midwest , do not have a River flowing through it. Des Moines has the Des Moines River, Indy has the White, Springfield the Sangamon, and so on. Our Lake Michigan shoreline differentiates Chicago from almost all other cities in the area, and is what people will think about when they think of us as a city. Sometime in the future, people may think something along the lines of "The city by the Lake... oh and they have a pretty nice riverfront too", but I kind of feel like the River will always be a distant second. When people think of Riverfront cities, they tend to think of cities on much bigger rivers, like Saint Louis, Memphis, Cincinnati, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2010, 02:38 PM
 
Location: In the heights
12,037 posts, read 12,324,284 times
Reputation: 5285
Though the difference between Chicago (and Milwaukee perhaps) is that its CBD surrounds the river while St. Louis, Memphis, and Cincinnati are simply besides their rivers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2010, 03:36 PM
 
445 posts, read 949,629 times
Reputation: 423
Imagine your house sits right next to an enormous municipal water tower.
In the backyard of your house, you have a garden hose....

Would people think of you as the "House next to the water tower" or the "house with the garden hose?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2010, 09:03 PM
 
Location: Chicago - near NW
3,047 posts, read 2,350,302 times
Reputation: 1809
The Chicago River outside of downtown is not a nice or fun destination at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2010, 09:22 PM
 
Location: Logan Square
1,912 posts, read 3,823,750 times
Reputation: 503
Quote:
Originally Posted by It'sAutomatic View Post
The Chicago River outside of downtown is not a nice or fun destination at all.
Tell that to the overpriced condos/SFHs going up in Logan Square, Bridgeport and Ravenswood to name just a couple that purport being riverside as a selling feature.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2010, 09:30 PM
 
5,277 posts, read 6,978,952 times
Reputation: 3519
Quote:
Originally Posted by surlycue View Post
Tell that to the overpriced condos/SFHs going up in Logan Square, Bridgeport and Ravenswood to name just a couple that purport being riverside as a selling feature.
But really apart from those areas, what the previous poster said about the river outside downtown is not pretty fun is pretty much right on.

Bridgeport has managed to turn some of its former industrial lands into the canal origins park. Once you go far northwest enough, beyond Goose Island and Lathrop Homes, yes the the north branch becomes greener and lined with parks. Re: Logan Square and Ravenswood.

Pilsen, where the previous poster is listed really has no nice riverfront area. Its all industry still pretty much.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2010, 05:43 PM
 
Location: Chicago
3,368 posts, read 3,577,650 times
Reputation: 2742
Quote:
Originally Posted by OyCrumbler View Post
Though the difference between Chicago (and Milwaukee perhaps) is that its CBD surrounds the river while St. Louis, Memphis, and Cincinnati are simply besides their rivers.
True. But the river's very narrowness allows it to work its way into the cityscape and be a part of the city in a way that neither the Ohio or Mississippi do in the cities mentioned above.

I think it's a matter of apples and oranges. And Chicago (and as noted by you Milwaukee) are among the few cities that are built on both banks of narrow rivers.

It is the very narrowness of the river that gives it a canyon feel that would be most difficult in a wider river. Even the East River is too wide to give that feel in the portion where lower Manhattan is on one bank and DT Bkyn on the other.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2010, 01:32 AM
 
Location: In the heights
12,037 posts, read 12,324,284 times
Reputation: 5285
Aye, it's what makes the area around the river so notable.

Heya, does Chicago do anything with the river like San Antonio's Riverwalk?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Options
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2013 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $94,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2015, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 - Top