U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Happy Easter!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-23-2012, 11:34 AM
 
Location: US
26,490 posts, read 14,094,067 times
Reputation: 1611

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by rstrats View Post
Finn_Jarber,

re: "Doesn't Matt 28:1 confirm it?"

Matthew 28:1 doesn’t say when the resurrection took place - only that the women came to the tomb on the 1st of the week.
AND they found the Tomb ALREADY empty....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-23-2012, 11:46 AM
 
Location: US
26,490 posts, read 14,094,067 times
Reputation: 1611
Quote:
Originally Posted by rstrats View Post
Since it's been awhile, perhaps someone new looking in will know of an author.
Why do we need an author?...Where in the Scriptures did Yeshua do away with the Sabbath?...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2012, 01:17 PM
 
344 posts, read 197,520 times
Reputation: 38
Richard1965,

re: "Why do we need an author?..."

I say "why" in the OP.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2012, 01:27 PM
 
344 posts, read 197,520 times
Reputation: 38
Since it has again been awhile, perhaps someone new looking in will know of an author.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2013, 06:20 AM
 
344 posts, read 197,520 times
Reputation: 38
Richard1965,

re: "AND they found the Tomb ALREADY empty...."


Correct, but it doesn't say when it became empty.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2013, 10:46 AM
 
Location: US
26,490 posts, read 14,094,067 times
Reputation: 1611
Quote:
Originally Posted by rstrats View Post
Finn_Jarber,

re: "Doesn't Matt 28:1 confirm it?"

Matthew 28:1 doesn’t say when the resurrection took place - only that the women came to the tomb on the 1st of the week.
It does not say on the first of the week...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2013, 11:18 AM
 
2,757 posts, read 2,186,834 times
Reputation: 567
Quote:
Originally Posted by rstrats View Post
A poster on another forum, the topic of which was questioning the authenticity of the last 12 verses in the book of Mark, wrote that it doesn’t really matter because there is no doctrinal teaching in Mark 16:9-20 that cannot be proved elsewhere in agreed Scripture.
 
I made the mistake of sticking my nose into the discussion by pointing out that actually there is a statement in verse 9, as the KJV and similar versions have it, that is used for a doctrinal teaching that is to be found nowhere else in Scripture. As the KJV translates it, it is the only place that puts the resurrection on the first day of the week. I then suggested that whenever the discussion of seventh day observance versus first day observance comes up, first day proponents usually use the idea of a first day resurrection to justify the change, and when questioned about the day of resurrection, quote Mark 16:9. The poster came back with: "Quote a published author who has done that." - I have not yet been able to come up with one. Does anyone here know of one?
The 'change' to what? Sunday observance?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2013, 02:17 PM
 
344 posts, read 197,520 times
Reputation: 38
Richard1965,

re: "It does not say on the first of the week..."


OK, it actually says: "...as the first day of the week began to dawn..." Either way, it says nothing about when the resurrection took place.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2013, 02:34 PM
 
344 posts, read 197,520 times
Reputation: 38
RevelationWriter,

re: "The 'change' to what? Sunday observance?"


The transference of the day of rest and holy convocation from the seventh day of the week to the first day of the week.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2013, 03:05 PM
 
4,066 posts, read 3,754,392 times
Reputation: 3120
Quote:
Originally Posted by rstrats View Post
RevelationWriter,

re: "The 'change' to what? Sunday observance?"


The transference of the day of rest and holy convocation from the seventh day of the week to the first day of the week.

There was no transference at that time, they still kept the Sabbath after Christ died. The change of the day of rest was done by the catholic church in the early 300AD's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2018, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top