![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 400,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 14,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads. Within the last few months our forum was cited in an article in 15 newspaper and in a story on AOL's homepage.| Search our forums (advanced): |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Although this was posted in my lighthearted bug thread.
I really didn't know that there were no carnivores prior to the fall. Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
No I don't think so. I am still going to eat things that had parents
![]() |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, we know Jesus cooked and ate fish. So...I would assume not.
Also, Peter fell into a trance and saw all kinds of previously "unclean" food and he was instructed to 'kill and eat.' So...again, I assume not. Later in Timothy, St. Paul makes a reference that in the last days there will be some who will forbid to marry and to eat meat...So again, I assume not. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well.. there were a few other things that changed after the fall, too.. For instance, wearing clothing!
(So maybe naked vegetarian hippies had something going after all! LOL!) But back to the OP.. Genesis 3: 21 ¶ Unto Adam also and to his wife did the LORD God make coats of skins, and clothed them. It appears that after the fall, an animal would have had to die to make clothing for them. IMO, this would have been the beginning of the era of flesh being killed for food, whether it be animals killing other animals or humans killing them. Not God's original plan, but death came because of sin.. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
And you know what I just noticed for the first time ever about the verse that was quoted? Genesis 1:30 And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so. The wording here strikes me as a bit odd. If God created all animals and people to be vegetarians, why did He liken "green herbs" as "meat"? Does anyone see what I'm getting at here? Like, why didn't God just say green herbs were for "food" instead of "meat", if no one was supposed to want to eat meat anyway, and I assume, would never have done so if sin didn't happen? Yet it sounds like He was subsituting meat with green herbs for everyone... ![]() ![]() Did that make a lick of sense, as my dad would say? ![]() |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
What does the word mean in the original language?![]() |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() I'm not wanting to the leg work myself...but okay, gosh darn it, Blue Letter Bible , here I come! ![]() |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm thinking that the word "meat" in this sense wouldn't have meant "flesh" as we think of the term, rather any edible, nutritious food... but I'm waiting to see what you find, jeff!
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|