Quote:
Originally Posted by Julian658
I was correct. You sound like a fundamentalist or a level I atheist. The ALL or NOTHING point of view is pathognomonic. Same person in opposite extremes of the spectrum.
Whether God exists or not is a moot point.
|
I think we can be more mature and leave out the ad hominem insults and invective. Especially given you were over on another forum recently presuming to admonish others to brush up on their debating skills. Discuss what it is I am saying please, and pocket the attacks on the person saying it.
The existence of a god might be moot to you but it is not to multitudes of religious people around the world. It is not just not moot to those people.... it is paramount. Not just to the people, but to the beliefs they purport to hold.
Take for example the topic of this thread which you appear to want to drift from often.... whether Catholics believe in Transubstantiation or not. That belief and what it entails is not just slightly but ENTIRELY dependent on whether there is a god or not. How is that "moot" exactly? Without a god deity the claims about what occurs during Transubstantiation are simply a nonsense mockery. The existence of said god therefore is the exact OPPOSITE of "moot". It is key, core, central and paramount.
Quote:
Originally Posted by travric
I'd be in agreement with that. However, research does show that that 'retreat' is made up of individuals going to and away from different faiths or beliefs.
|
Not always. For example the fastest growing minority group in the US has been shown to be atheists.
Further the migration tends to be towards belief systems that...... while they are called religions...... are actually just dilute forms of new age spiritualism...... and definitions of "god" have become increasingly dilute and meaningless to the point they often do not even refer to an intentional or intelligent agent any more.
If you simply operate on the word "religion" without unpacking that, then what you say starts to approach the appearance of being correct and accurate. However when you dig deeper into the figures and meanings you find that this is often not the case at all.
But we are drifting off topic here. This is not a thread about whether people are leaving religions or not. It is a thread about one specific religion, one specific tenet of that religion, and what people in that religion actually know or believe about that tenet. And the point where we started to drift off topic is the one I will therefore return to in an attempt to be the one staying on topic here: From early school age until the actual day of "First communnion" and on up until "Confirmation".... there is little attempt (In Ireland and UK at least) to teach children.... even in Catholic schools..... exactly what the ceremony means, entails and claims.
At most such children are simply taught where to stand, what to say, what prostrations to make, and how to act. Little more.
So one answer to the question "Do Catholics Believe This Doctrine Real?" would be "How could they? Many of them are never even taught what it means or entails!".
Quote:
Originally Posted by travric
Is the agenda perhaps that maybe somebody there wants to give 'atheism' a fair shake in a formerly staunch Catholic country?
|
The "agenda" there is quite nicely summed up by the Mission Statement of Atheist Ireland. "Atheist Ireland aims to build a rational, ethical and secular society free from superstition and supernaturalism."