Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-25-2015, 12:07 PM
 
Location: El Paso, TX
32,928 posts, read 26,160,446 times
Reputation: 16087

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard1965 View Post
That verse does not support your theory...
Not a theory. Before salvation no one is righteous in God's sight. We are all born with a fallen nature as a result of Adam's original sin, and spiritually dead. (Gen. 2:17; Rom. 3:9-18; Rom.5:12-19; Eph. 2:1).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-25-2015, 12:21 PM
 
Location: El Paso, TX
32,928 posts, read 26,160,446 times
Reputation: 16087
Quote:
Originally Posted by godofthunder9010 View Post
The underlying issue is whether or not new born babies are born damned. The Garden of Eden story does support the idea that all the descendants of Adam and Eve became sin-capable, but it does not support the idea that we are born stained, guilty and worthy of hell before we actually do anything sinful ourselves.
And yet David believed himself to have been born a sinner as Psalm 51:5 states. And that is how most commentators understand it. Psalm 51:5 Commentaries: Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, And in sin my mother conceived me.

And therefore Jesus came into the world by means of a virgin birth in order to avoid being born with an old sin nature and under the penalty of Adam's sin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2015, 12:32 PM
 
Location: Southern Oregon
17,071 posts, read 10,832,457 times
Reputation: 1869
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike555 View Post
And yet David believed himself to have been born a sinner as Psalm 51:5 states. And that is how most commentators understand it. Psalm 51:5 Commentaries: Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, And in sin my mother conceived me.

And therefore Jesus came into the world by means of a virgin birth in order to avoid being born with an old sin nature and under the penalty of Adam's sin.
David certainly viewed himself as a sinner living in a sinful world, but those verses do not speak of his own sin, but the nature of the people who gave him birth and raised him. There is no penalty for Adam's sin but TO Adam and Adam would not have sinned if he were not capable of it (self evident), and that reason given for virgin birth plays to a corrupt perception of our nature and that of our relationship with God. (Known as "Reformed Theology)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2015, 12:45 PM
 
Location: El Paso, TX
32,928 posts, read 26,160,446 times
Reputation: 16087
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike555 View Post
And yet David believed himself to have been born a sinner as Psalm 51:5 states. And that is how most commentators understand it. Psalm 51:5 Commentaries: Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, And in sin my mother conceived me.

And therefore Jesus came into the world by means of a virgin birth in order to avoid being born with an old sin nature and under the penalty of Adam's sin.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nateswift View Post
David certainly viewed himself as a sinner living in a sinful world, but those verses do not speak of his own sin, but the nature of the people who gave him birth and raised him. There is no penalty for Adam's sin but TO Adam and Adam would not have sinned if he were not capable of it (self evident), and that reason given for virgin birth plays to a corrupt perception of our nature and that of our relationship with God. (Known as "Reformed Theology)
While that is your opinion it is not the belief of most theologians and it is not teaching of the Bible. The simple fact of the matter is that Paul tells us in Romans 5:18 that ONE transgression resulted in the condemnation of all men. We are not condemned by our own personal sins, but as Paul stated, by Adam's transgression.
Romans 5:18 Therefore, as one trespass led to condemnation for all men, so one act of righteousness leads to justification and life for all men. 19] For as by the one man’s disobedience the many were made sinners, so by the one man’s obedience the many will be made righteous.

Paul plainly stated that it was by one man's (Adam's) trespass, that we were all made sinners. It was Adam's sin that led to condemnation for all men. We are not condemned on the basis of our personal sins, but on the basis of Adam's original sin. Now you might not like that, and you might not accept it, but that is what the Bible teaches. Our personal sins were never imputed to us for judgment but were instead imputed to Christ as He hung on the cross and paid the penalty for them in our place.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2015, 12:52 PM
 
Location: Southern Oregon
17,071 posts, read 10,832,457 times
Reputation: 1869
That perception is clarified in Romans 5:12 for those who misunderstand it: "Therefore, just as through one man sin entered into the world, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men, because all sinned--
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2015, 01:10 PM
 
Location: El Paso, TX
32,928 posts, read 26,160,446 times
Reputation: 16087
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike555 View Post
While that is your opinion it is not the belief of most theologians and it is not teaching of the Bible. The simple fact of the matter is that Paul tells us in Romans 5:18 that ONE transgression resulted in the condemnation of all men. We are not condemned by our own personal sins, but as Paul stated, by Adam's transgression.
Romans 5:18 Therefore, as one trespass led to condemnation for all men, so one act of righteousness leads to justification and life for all men. 19] For as by the one man’s disobedience the many were made sinners, so by the one man’s obedience the many will be made righteous.

Paul plainly stated that it was by one man's (Adam's) trespass, that we were all made sinners. It was Adam's sin that led to condemnation for all men. We are not condemned on the basis of our personal sins, but on the basis of Adam's original sin. Now you might not like that, and you might not accept it, but that is what the Bible teaches. Our personal sins were never imputed to us for judgment but were instead imputed to Christ as He hung on the cross and paid the penalty for them in our place.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nateswift View Post
That perception is clarified in Romans 5:12 for those who misunderstand it: "Therefore, just as through one man sin entered into the world, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men, because all sinned--
'All sinned' is past tense. Did you personally commit personal sin before you were ever born? Did you commit any personal sins at the time that Paul wrote Romans 5:12? No you did not. You didn't exist yet.

God views all mankind as participating in Adam's sin because the entire human race was seminally in Adam who was the representative man or federal head of the human race. All men were condemned because of Adam's sin. Not on the basis of their own personal sins. In Adam all die. We are born spiritually dead due to Adam's sin.

1 Cor. 15:22 For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ shall all be made alive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2015, 01:14 PM
 
Location: Chicago Area
12,688 posts, read 6,688,791 times
Reputation: 6593
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike555 View Post
While that is your opinion it is not the belief of most theologians and it is not teaching of the Bible. The simple fact of the matter is that Paul tells us in Romans 5:18 that ONE transgression resulted in the condemnation of all men. We are not condemned by our own personal sins, but as Paul stated, by Adam's transgression.
Romans 5:18 Therefore, as one trespass led to condemnation for all men, so one act of righteousness leads to justification and life for all men. 19] For as by the one man’s disobedience the many were made sinners, so by the one man’s obedience the many will be made righteous.

Paul plainly stated that it was by one man's (Adam's) trespass, that we were all made sinners. It was Adam's sin that led to condemnation for all men. We are not condemned on the basis of our personal sins, but on the basis of Adam's original sin. Now you might not like that, and you might not accept it, but that is what the Bible teaches. Our personal sins were never imputed to us for judgment but were instead imputed to Christ as He hung on the cross and paid the penalty for them in our place.
Actually, he says "all men" which may denote adults. We were born sin-capable and there was pretty much zero chance for any of us to make it to adulthood without sinning and sinning a lot. But the passage is not explicitly saying, "all human beings" so we are left uncertain.

Ultimately, you see the Bible as infallible and I do not. Most theologies do indeed agree with you because they are all offspring of the Catholic Church. This means that virtually all translations of the Bible are going to support original sin. Original sin is a Catholic doctrine and you inherited it from them. The Imperial Roman Church was very effective in stamping out all doctrinal dissention, but did the early Catholic Church get it right? I think we can agree that they got it wrong with praying to saints, the immaculate conception, celibacy, the primacy of Rome, etc.

To me, the idea that babies are born damned offends the Holy Spirit. I accept that over scripture on this matter. The scriptures probably don't mean what you think they mean, but even if they were absolutely explicit, the Spirit trumps the Bible anyways.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2015, 01:25 PM
 
Location: El Paso, TX
32,928 posts, read 26,160,446 times
Reputation: 16087
Quote:
Originally Posted by godofthunder9010 View Post
Actually, he says "all men" which may denote adults. We were born sin-capable and there was pretty much zero chance for any of us to make it to adulthood without sinning and sinning a lot. But the passage is not explicitly saying, "all human beings" so we are left uncertain.

Ultimately, you see the Bible as infallible and I do not. Most theologies do indeed agree with you because they are all offspring of the Catholic Church. This means that virtually all translations of the Bible are going to support original sin. Original sin is a Catholic doctrine and you inherited it from them. The Imperial Roman Church was very effective in stamping out all doctrinal dissention, but did the early Catholic Church get it right? I think we can agree that they got it wrong with praying to saints, the immaculate conception, celibacy, the primacy of Rome, etc.

To me, the idea that babies are born damned offends the Holy Spirit. I accept that over scripture on this matter. The scriptures probably don't mean what you think they mean, but even if they were absolutely explicit, the Spirit trumps the Bible anyways.
That's just an attempt to explain away what the passage says because it's offensive to you. But you don't speak for the Holy Spirit, and the Holy Spirit never contradicts the Bible. Further, it is not an issue of improper translations.

It's obvious that you don't view the Bible as being infallible. But I do, and I hold to the Biblical teaching of original sin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2015, 02:31 PM
 
Location: Southern Oregon
17,071 posts, read 10,832,457 times
Reputation: 1869
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike555 View Post
That's just an attempt to explain away what the passage says because it's offensive to you. But you don't speak for the Holy Spirit, and the Holy Spirit never contradicts the Bible. Further, it is not an issue of improper translations.

It's obvious that you don't view the Bible as being infallible. But I do, and I hold to the Biblical teaching of original sin.
It is entirely possible that you are correct in your presentation of the perceptions of those writers, but I don't believe that it is what Jesus taught, and if I did, I would be looking for another faith system.

For me to accept such a doctrine would be merely craven.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2015, 03:35 PM
 
Location: El Paso, TX
32,928 posts, read 26,160,446 times
Reputation: 16087
Quote:
Originally Posted by nateswift View Post
It is entirely possible that you are correct in your presentation of the perceptions of those writers, but I don't believe that it is what Jesus taught, and if I did, I would be looking for another faith system.

For me to accept such a doctrine would be merely craven.
We are just going to have to disagree.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top