Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-23-2015, 10:36 PM
 
Location: US
32,530 posts, read 22,029,149 times
Reputation: 2227

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by twin.spin View Post
right .... only that at the baptism of Jesus the Triune God was seen and heard.
Nope...Wrong again...And you CAN'T prove it...




Quote:
  1. Father spoke = One G-d...
  2. Holy Spirit descended = Spirit OF G-d... (not seperate entity)
  3. The Son was in the water = So?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-23-2015, 10:38 PM
 
Location: US
32,530 posts, read 22,029,149 times
Reputation: 2227
Quote:
Originally Posted by twin.spin View Post
Originally Posted by twin.spin
rather simple : "All scripture is God breathed" .... all of it.
John was given what to write by God the Holy Spirit (third person of the trinity)
Originally Posted by DRob4JC (in response)
You understand that unbelievers will never get this as long as they are unbelievers.

Originally Posted by twin.spin
Sure do, those without God the Holy Spirit are spiritually discerned. 1 Corinthians 2:14


That I understand as a matter of fact exactly what DRob4JC was saying.
IOW, you make no sense whatsoever...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2015, 10:39 PM
 
Location: arizona ... most of the time
11,825 posts, read 12,491,540 times
Reputation: 1319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerwade View Post
Discernment is not acquired by quoting the Bible.
You should "put to death" that Old nature.
So what is it called when somebody argues not to quote the Bible then quotes it ... double minded \ hypocrite?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2015, 10:48 PM
 
Location: arizona ... most of the time
11,825 posts, read 12,491,540 times
Reputation: 1319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard1965 View Post
Nope...Wrong again...And you CAN'T prove it...
  1. Father spoke
  2. Holy Spirit descended
  3. The Son was in the water
Keep on studying what God spoke in the Bible and maybe God the Holy Spirit will lead you to the truth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2015, 11:12 PM
 
Location: Arizona
28,956 posts, read 16,357,412 times
Reputation: 2296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerwade View Post
Discernment is not acquired by quoting the Bible.
Quote:
Originally Posted by twin.spin View Post
So what is it called when somebody argues not to quote the Bible then quotes it ... double minded \ hypocrite?
You can quote it, but that's not how you acquire discernment.
It's having the ability to perceive, or see, beyond the words.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2015, 02:17 AM
 
Location: S. Wales.
50,088 posts, read 20,717,984 times
Reputation: 5930
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
You understand that unbelievers will never get this as long as they are unbelievers.
Oh, we get it. We just see that it doesn't really accord with the fact of what the Bible actually looks like.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2015, 02:53 AM
 
2,625 posts, read 3,413,694 times
Reputation: 3200
Quote:
Originally Posted by RomulusXXV View Post
To the OP ... a similar question could be asked where Jesus spoke to God in the Garden of Gethsemane (Luke 22:39-46) while the disciples slept. He was alone at the time ...no one there to record his conversation at all. Similarly so with Matthew 4:1-11 where Jesus encounters Satan.

Incidentally, regarding 'the Holy Spirit' ...I've come across people from all denominations who claim to have an infilling of the HS. Problem is ...the Holy Spirit has a tendency to give people conflicting messages, hence the many different Christian denominations. How does that work . . .?
Well, for that matter, similar questions could be asked such as:

(1) Who was around to witness creation before the advent of Adam and Eve?
(2) Who was around to witness Adam and Eve and then the serpent episode?
(3) Who was around to witness Jonah in the belly of the sea creature and then Jonah alone with God when he was resentful and angry at God for showing mercy to the land of Nineveh?

and a myriad of other examples.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2015, 08:28 AM
 
9,981 posts, read 8,590,580 times
Reputation: 5664
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard1965 View Post
Looks like you're wrong again, Snowy...


Mar 15:43 Joseph of Arimathea, an honourable counsellor, who also himself was waiting for the reign of God, came, boldly entered in unto Pilate, and asked the body of Jesus.
Mar 15:44 And Pilate wondered if he were already dead, and having called near the centurion, did question him if he were long dead,
Mar 15:45 and having known it from the centurion, he granted the body to Joseph.
Mar 15:46 And he, having brought fine linen, and having taken him down, wrapped him in the linen, and laid him in a sepulchre that had been hewn out of a rock, and he rolled a stone unto the door of the sepulchre,
Mar 15:47 and Mary the Magdalene, and Mary of Joses, were beholding where he is laid.
Richard, I know 100 times more than you ever will about Christianity.
Here, I will show you that indeed Nicodemus was present.

38 After this Joseph of Arimathea, who was a disciple of Jesus, but in secret, for fear of the Jews, asked Pilate to let him take away the body of Jesus. Pilate gave him leave; so he came and took Jesus’ body away; 39 and with him was Nicodemus, the same who made his first visit to Jesus by night; he brought with him a mixture of myrrh and aloes, of about a hundred pounds’ weight. 40 They took Jesus’ body, then, and wrapped it in winding-cloths with the spices; that is how the Jews prepare a body for burial. 41 In the same quarter where he was crucified there was a garden, with a new tomb in it, one in which no man had ever yet been buried. 42 Here, since the tomb was close at hand, they laid Jesus, because of the Jewish feast on the morrow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2015, 09:01 AM
 
Location: In God's Hand
1,100 posts, read 796,346 times
Reputation: 129
Quote:
Originally Posted by OzzyRules View Post
How did the author of the gospel of John know about this conversation? It supposedly occurred between Jesus and Nicodemus, a Pharisee who came to Jesus at night to ask him questions.
His disciples have been together with Jesus enough that He could have shared what His conversation with Nicodemus was that night if it was a private. It's not like, He could get a visit without rousing any one else up to inquire what that private visit was about during the night.

Then there is this:

2 Peter 1:19 We have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto ye do well that ye take heed, as unto a light that shineth in a dark place, until the day dawn, and the day star arise in your hearts: 20 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation. 21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.

That would explain the reference to Enoch in the Book of Jude when obviously, no writings of Enoch was on the ark with Noah & his family.

That means the supposed books of Enoch are fakes, which is why those with His wisdom will find it as going against the accepted scripture in the KJV Bible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2015, 09:46 AM
 
Location: S. Wales.
50,088 posts, read 20,717,984 times
Reputation: 5930
Quote:
Originally Posted by PoorInSpirit View Post
His disciples have been together with Jesus enough that He could have shared what His conversation with Nicodemus was that night if it was a private. It's not like, He could get a visit without rousing any one else up to inquire what that private visit was about during the night.

....
That's exactly why the explanation for why things in Matthew and nowhere else have to be false. The other disciples ought to have known about the massacre of the children at Bethlehem and the whole star and Herod story and the supposed tomb -guard, not to mention the raising of Lazarus and all those Lucan parables that never got a mention in the other gospels. And also the involvement of Nicodemus whom the other evangelists have never heard of, nor the spear -thrust or a single one of the theological sermons in John. Isn't it crystal clear that they each made this stuff up out of their own heads?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:53 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top