Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That's right, and we had laws against sodomy until fairly recently.
You see, liberals think they know more about the Constitution than
everyone else of the last 200 years in America did.
Concerning those who proclaim God accepts and approves of these defilers of the flesh, they are not going to be happy once their cheque is due.
Agreed. It was the extreme liberals in the 1960's who ushered in the antichrist age. He'll be making his appearance in this generation, as it is written. The liberals will love him, as he'll have the same spirit as Obama.
Agreed. It was the extreme liberals in the 1960's who ushered in the antichrist age. He'll be making his appearance in this generation, as it is written. The liberals will love him, as he'll have the same spirit as Obama.
Not mine. REASON is not what laws on based on. Laws are based on CONSTITUTIONAL basis and HUMAN RIGHTS, not your cultist sharia reasoning. You are thinking about IRAN and ISIS.
The constitution was not created by those fine men to be a source to promote perversion. In those days, homosexuals were rightfully too ashamed to let it be known.
That's the attitude that causes people to bully LGBTQ.
And it's not from God or Jesus. It's from the dark hearts of fundamentalists who don't care that trans people are being murdered because they are trans. It's from the dark hearts of fundamentalists who don't care that gay teenagers are committing suicide after years of abuse and bullying.
Why are you on CD? You could be marching through Target, shouting at people and wielding your Bible like some kind of holy baseball bat.
Tell us what section of the Constitution prohibits sodomy?
The Tenth, which relegates to the States all powers not specifically
enumerated to the Federal government.
Moreover, Federal recognition of marriage and the business of the Federal
government having any say in marriage is a violation of the Constitution
just like Antonio Scalia said in his dissent.
Oh, and pornography can be illegal also, like it was in most States.
Not mine. REASON is not what laws on based on. Laws are based on CONSTITUTIONAL basis and HUMAN RIGHTS, not your cultist sharia reasoning. You are thinking about IRAN and ISIS.
That's because you're into perversion. Laws are based on a reasonable interpretation of the text as intended by the framers.
Sad that there's still people in the US of A who can't get over that uppity coloured boy usurping the White House.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
