Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You obviously haven't been paying attention. Typical liberal.
I think, jimmiej, you have not understood what is being said. Essentially, that fundamentalist doctrines do NOT make sense(=nonsense). That there is no need for laws and rules when you operate in the Spirit which IS shown in concern for the well-being of everyone in any situation. That often the intent of what is perceived as a law or rule has been missed and great damage resulted from insisting on those bad perceptions.
Evidence? Evidence, would make your statement more convincing.
My evidence is there are no originals and the copied that do exist were written nearly 200 years after the fact and based on oral stories..and teh fact that even a comic book does not prove he existence of Spiderman.
My evidence is there are no originals and the copied that do exist were written nearly 200 years after the fact and based on oral stories..and teh fact that even a comic book does not prove he existence of Spiderman.
One does not need originals when what they have is accurate. The scribes were extremely meticulous. They knew which letter each line should end with. If it had an error, they threw it away and started over. The age of a document does not affect its accuracy.
It is always amusing when secularist fundies try to compare what is know to be fiction, with what is not know to be fiction. I guess that is the best they can do with what have to work with.
One does not need originals when what they have is accurate. The scribes were extremely meticulous. They knew which letter each line should end with. If it had an error, they threw it away and started over. The age of a document does not affect its accuracy.
It is always amusing when secularist fundies try to compare what is know to be fiction, with what is not know to be fiction. I guess that is the best they can do with what have to work with.
The word fundamentalist in its true meaning is perfectly acceptable, but in this day and age it means something else.
don't let the secular fundamentalist tell us how to use it. Can 2 walk together unless they agree? Use it the way it really is.
Quote:
You cannot serve both at the same time.... You are one or the other
If you accept and use the term the way non-believers have distorted it meaning,YOU are the one serving both at the same time. I am one. I use it in its original meaning and that is what any Christian would do.
Quote:
The fact that all bible fundamentalists are always talking about sin and what they assume is sin in others clearly proves they are sin not God conscious.
Your brush is way to wide. Most conservative churches talk more abuot God than they do about sin. Again you have accepted the theology of the secular fundamentalist.
Quote:
It might help for you to believe him who the scriptures testify of.
It will definitely help you if you stop judging other Christians by your unbiblical standards and get the log out of your own eye before you try to remove the speck out of mine.
For my information, do you accept that all of the Bible is God's inspired word?
I think, jimmiej, you have not understood what is being said. Essentially, that fundamentalist doctrines do NOT make sense(=nonsense). That there is no need for laws and rules when you operate in the Spirit which IS shown in concern for the well-being of everyone in any situation. That often the intent of what is perceived as a law or rule has been missed and great damage resulted from insisting on those bad perceptions.
Typical liberal nonsense ^^^
Jerwade chastises me for using the term "liberal", but won't say the same about the term "fundamentalist". Biased and hypocritical. Where is the concern for the well-being of everyone?
One does not need originals when what they have is accurate. The scribes were extremely meticulous. They knew which letter each line should end with. If it had an error, they threw it away and started over. The age of a document does not affect its accuracy.
It is always amusing when secularist fundies try to compare what is know to be fiction, with what is not know to be fiction. I guess that is the best they can do with what have to work with.
How do we tell if it is accurate without originals?
If I draw a picture of MONA LISA, can you say if it is accurate without looking at the original?
My evidence is there are no originals and the copied that do exist were written nearly 200 years after the fact and based on oral stories..and teh fact that even a comic book does not prove he existence of Spiderman.
That's the real imperfection of humans. God dealt with it by providing 2 independent sources (NIV and KJV) which are theologically identical. Such that we can get His message to the accuracy that His said standard will convey, and for His final judgment to be carried out legitimately.
Anyway, no any other religion can upkeep their Holy book to this extent.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.