Quote:
Originally Posted by SumTingy
The most simplistic argument against your ideology and you fold and resort to ridicule.
One more chance. You have a .00000008 sample size. Explain it to us please how that fits in with the definition of science. If you can’t answer this simple question, you need to get a refund on your education. And spare us the insults.
|
First off you never offered an argument against plate tectonics you showed a lack of understanding of what is science. That continents move was noted previously and even mapped out by Weggerner in the early 1900s and that is where continental drift came about. But scientists could not buy the concept that continents floated upon ocean crusts. When study upon the mantle discovered it was flowing lead to the hypothesis and then theory of plate tectonics. We also have the capability to study past plate movements in our geology and plate tectonics and lack of it on our moon, other moons and other planets.
Your sample size is a silly made up number and has zero to do with science, how sampling works or statistics. It's simply a meaningless number. We have been studying how river systems work for maybe 50 times longer which according to your idea of sample size means that we cannot have an idea of how river systems function, nor could we have large enough samples to measure planets revolving around the sun or if a medicine works.
It is an outright lie to say I folded and could not address your argument of sample size. It is simply that sample Sze is meaningless as is length of study in the ability to be able to form a valid theory.
I also challenged you to show that plate tectonics was not a valid theory which you have nor done. There was not a single mention in your definition of science that specified the length of time a topic needed to be studied nor tested hence your requirement that it must be studied for a long time does not fit the definition that you yourself 0rov8ded.
And again your sample size is a made up number by either yourself or others and is not in fact even a sample size.
If you wish to continue this discussion with me please do so in an honest manner. Otherwise I will let you claim a victory as life is too short to worry about how someone chooses to be dishonest in order to claim points. I'd rather spend my time exchanging posts with those who wish to have honest discussions.