Adultery's Gray Areas (hell, sin, Jesus, translation)

[Mightyqueen801]

Originally Posted by MinivanDriver

Well, unless we expect women to go around veiled, one can hardly expect men to not notice an attractive woman. But there's an enormous difference between thinking, "She is attractive" and daydreaming about banging her.

Common sense has no place on this forum, MD!

[pinacled]

Originally Posted by Mightyqueen801

Common sense has no place on this forum, MD!

So instead of deleting the vulgar content that is a direct violation of the tos.

You respond with that comment.
Being that you are a moderator.
Why do you encourage posters who use foul language?

Are they perhaps an employee of citydata.

[Mightyqueen801]

Originally Posted by pinacled

So instead of deleting the vulgar content that is a direct violation of the tos.

There was no vulgar content that violates the TOS.

Originally Posted by pinacled

You respond with that comment.

Which was meant to be humorous. I realize not everyone has the ability to recognize that.

Originally Posted by pinacled

Being that you are a moderator.
Why do you encourage posters who use foul language?

My post was not red and therefore had nothing to do with being a moderator, and at any rate, no foul language was used.

Originally Posted by pinacled

Are they perhaps an employee of citydata.

Are you really going to go there again, pinacled?

[Thoreau424]

The only "offenses" that occurred took place in pinacled's head. The rest of us clearly understood the comments.

Some among us remain stuck are in retaliatory mode, stone in hand, ready to strike at any supposed "guilty" party. Never mind that the "stone" is in verbal and emotional form; it still exists symbolically. It's also a hazard because the pattern is "act first, think later or not at all".

[Jerwade]

Originally Posted by Mightyqueen801

Are you really going to go there again, pinacled?

I know, right. He needs to repent.

[MinivanDriver]

Originally Posted by pinacled

So instead of deleting the vulgar content that is a direct violation of the tos.

You respond with that comment.
Being that you are a moderator.
Why do you encourage posters who use foul language?

Are they perhaps an employee of citydata.

It's not like I played a clip from Wanda Whips Wall Street or anything. Would you have preferred that instead?

[mensaguy]

Originally Posted by MinivanDriver

It's not like I played a clip from Wanda Whips Wall Street or anything. Would you have preferred that instead?

Is that on NetFlix?

[pinacled]

Originally Posted by Mightyqueen801

There was no vulgar content that violates the TOS.



Which was meant to be humorous. I realize not everyone has the ability to recognize that.



My post was not red and therefore had nothing to do with being a moderator, and at any rate, no foul language was used.



Are you really going to go there again, pinacled?

Noted,
readers be aware that the TOS has been redacted in order to allow Vulgar content.

Including explicit sexual content.

[TroutDude]

Originally Posted by pinacled

Noted,
readers be aware that the TOS has been redacted in order to allow Vulgar content.

Including explicit sexual content.

[peacecrusader888]

Whether a woman is attractive or not, they are ALL the same, according to the spirit of Ama. I believe in Him.