Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive > Brand-specific forums > Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, and Ram
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-08-2009, 03:58 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,508 posts, read 33,300,433 times
Reputation: 7622

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTOlover View Post
I would not mind a 1971 hemi cuda with a pistol grip four speed
I wouldn't mind owning one of those, either.

Or something like a '69 Dodge Coronet R/T 440-Magnum with 3.55 axle ratio and Torqueflite auto trans (with shift kit).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-10-2009, 01:19 AM
 
Location: Earth
4,237 posts, read 24,774,443 times
Reputation: 2274
The new Challenger is probably the nicest looking car they've came out with since the 1970's....but one thing they should have done was give the rear roof line just a little bit more slope....so it would be like it's 1970 counterpart.

Other Mopars I'd like to own would be a 1968-70 Charger, or a 70 Cuda or a 68-69 Dart. I also like the 71-74 Charger and the 1970-76 Duster and Demon. Which I just learned to day was later renamed a Dart Sport but used the same body....never could understand why Darts in the 70's looked both like Dusters and Valiants.

Now if you want to talk torque, you have to hand that one to the 1970 455 stage I that was found in the 1970 GSX....510 ft lbs of tire shredding torque at an incredibly low 2800 rpm....no Mopar or Ford or other GM car touched it in it's day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2009, 11:00 AM
 
Location: Vancouver, B.C., Canada
11,155 posts, read 29,307,351 times
Reputation: 5479
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deez Nuttz View Post
The new Challenger is probably the nicest looking car they've came out with since the 1970's....but one thing they should have done was give the rear roof line just a little bit more slope....so it would be like it's 1970 counterpart.

Other Mopars I'd like to own would be a 1968-70 Charger, or a 70 Cuda or a 68-69 Dart. I also like the 71-74 Charger and the 1970-76 Duster and Demon. Which I just learned to day was later renamed a Dart Sport but used the same body....never could understand why Darts in the 70's looked both like Dusters and Valiants.

Now if you want to talk torque, you have to hand that one to the 1970 455 stage I that was found in the 1970 GSX....510 ft lbs of tire shredding torque at an incredibly low 2800 rpm....no Mopar or Ford or other GM car touched it in it's day.
LOL I canjust imagine all that torque going through those skinny bias-ply tires of the day
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2009, 11:14 AM
 
Location: Earth
4,237 posts, read 24,774,443 times
Reputation: 2274
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTOlover View Post
LOL I canjust imagine all that torque going through those skinny bias-ply tires of the day
Yeah me neither.....I'm sure the tire company kept in good business there during the muscle car years. But then again with that torque you could run a taller gear for highway cruising and still be able to whoop up on people. All when overdrive trannies were unheard of on muscle cars.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2009, 12:17 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,508 posts, read 33,300,433 times
Reputation: 7622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deez Nuttz View Post
Now if you want to talk torque, you have to hand that one to the 1970 455 stage I that was found in the 1970 GSX....510 ft lbs of tire shredding torque at an incredibly low 2800 rpm....no Mopar or Ford or other GM car touched it in it's day.
They weren't muscle cars, but the Cadillacs of that era could match and even exceed the Buick in the torque department...

1968-70 Cadillac 472.... torque: 525 lbs/ft
1970 Cadillac Eldorado 500... torque: 550 lbs/ft
1971 Cadilac Eldorado 500.... torque 535 lbs/ft
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2009, 12:36 PM
 
Location: Vancouver, B.C., Canada
11,155 posts, read 29,307,351 times
Reputation: 5479
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleet View Post
They weren't muscle cars, but the Cadillacs of that era could match and even exceed the Buick in the torque department...

1968-70 Cadillac 472.... torque: 525 lbs/ft
1970 Cadillac Eldorado 500... torque: 550 lbs/ft
1971 Cadilac Eldorado 500.... torque 535 lbs/ft
yeah but caddy's were huge in relation to GM A-body I would not call a 1970 eldorado a performance car by any means
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2009, 01:19 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,508 posts, read 33,300,433 times
Reputation: 7622
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTOlover View Post
yeah but caddy's were huge in relation to GM A-body I would not call a 1970 eldorado a performance car by any means
I know, but they were production cars with factory engines. And they did have the highest torque rating of any car in the world at the time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2009, 01:23 PM
 
Location: United States
2,497 posts, read 7,475,507 times
Reputation: 2270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gimme3steps View Post
Challenger styling beats the Camaro hands down? When you get those $ together, first thing you should buy is a new pair of glasses.
It's a matter of personal opinion no need to get your panties in a knot. In my opinion, which I am entitled to, the new Camaro looks ugly. The more I see the uglier it gets. Horrific to be quite honest. Sure it may be fast and expensive but it don't change my opinion that's it's still a very poor attempt to bring back the Camaro.
See ya at Pearl vision pal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2009, 01:29 PM
 
Location: United States
2,497 posts, read 7,475,507 times
Reputation: 2270
Quote:
Originally Posted by NHDave View Post
Yes it does, maybe you need glasses? The Camaro looks like an oversized hotwheels car.
That's what it is! I had trouble pin-pointing exactly why I find the Camaro ugly, but I think your on to something
The tiny side windows/low roof don't help either. The pointy front end is just gross, and those Corvette wanna-be tail lights look nothing like the old Camaro's. I looked at one last nigh in person and it was even worse than the pictures. Once the initial hype wears off I think more people will see how tacky Chevrolet's new "Dream Machine" really is...more like Nightmare Machine
Camaro died in 1981, before that hell yes I would drive one, after that, nothing impressive in the styling dept. Performance is another issue, they perforn great, still don't mask that confused styling.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2009, 02:12 PM
 
Location: Vancouver, B.C., Canada
11,155 posts, read 29,307,351 times
Reputation: 5479
I wonder if dodge will make a the challenger SRT-10 it would be an interesting ride
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive > Brand-specific forums > Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, and Ram
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top