Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Ohio > Cincinnati
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-24-2011, 08:44 AM
 
Location: Mason, OH
9,259 posts, read 16,788,546 times
Reputation: 1956

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dayton Sux View Post
Anyway, this streetcar thing. Did they ever specify where the operating funds were coming from?

Seems that would be the expesne to be concerned about, not so much this up-front capital cost.
Oh it was going to pay for itself through the usage fees - Yuk, Yuk, Yuk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-24-2011, 08:48 AM
 
Location: "Daytonnati"
4,241 posts, read 7,171,068 times
Reputation: 3014
^
seriously?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2011, 09:43 AM
 
10,135 posts, read 27,460,769 times
Reputation: 8400
The estimates for deficit operating costs for rail have always been wildly incorrect.

Further, the operating costs reported by the operators of these systems range so much that it is a certainty that the numbers are fabricated. Suffice it to say that for planning purposes, one should expect a small system to subsidize 80% of the cost of operation. If you have 5000 people a day riding at $1.00 that would be $1,825,000 of fare revenue. That comes from the feasability study here:

http://www.cincystreetcar.com/docs/C...ibility006.pdf

Then, if you have $1,825,000 of fares revenue, you sould expect to require $9,150,000 of annual subsidy using the 80% number. Nowhere, has anyone ever disclosed that the City could be saddled with that kind of cost. But, using others' experiences, that is what it would be. And, is that a big surprise? Not to me.

Last edited by Wilson513; 03-24-2011 at 10:49 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2011, 09:50 AM
 
Location: "Daytonnati"
4,241 posts, read 7,171,068 times
Reputation: 3014
^
The operating subsidy was always the Achilles Heel for this concept for me. Where was it going to come from?

This was a big deal in Los Angeles, where the public transit authority was cutting back on bus service...essentially cannibalizing the bus system to subsidize a subway line that had limited use to bus riders, which led to sort of a transit-users uprising against the transit authority there.

I think if we wanted to make mass transit useful or less of a hassle we'd increase frequency of bus operations, make that system more user-freindly and less of a hassle. One way would to increase frequency of service as much as expanding service.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2011, 09:57 AM
 
10,135 posts, read 27,460,769 times
Reputation: 8400
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dayton Sux View Post
^
The operating subsidy was always the Achilles Heel for this concept for me. Where was it going to come from?

This was a big deal in Los Angeles, where the public transit authority was cutting back on bus service...essentially cannibalizing the bus system to subsidize a subway line that had limited use to bus riders, which led to sort of a transit-users uprising against the transit authority there.

I think if we wanted to make mass transit useful or less of a hassle we'd increase frequency of bus operations, make that system more user-freindly and less of a hassle. One way would to increase frequency of service as much as expanding service.

You are quite right about the bus service being the answer. Improving bus service and charging appropriately leads to teh correct economic result. there will come a time when people will choose a bus over a private car for certain travel. Buses are scalable trains are not.

I am astounded that young people do not immediately see that trains are static. Buses and cars are dynamic. Trains are scalable within a very very narrow range. buses are infinitely scalable.

The money was coming out of the general operating fund of the City (although Casino revenures were earmarked) competing with pools and health centers and trash, fire and police. Ridiculous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2011, 10:21 AM
 
2,886 posts, read 4,975,164 times
Reputation: 1508
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dayton Sux View Post
I think if we wanted to make mass transit useful or less of a hassle we'd increase frequency of bus operations, make that system more user-freindly and less of a hassle. One way would to increase frequency of service as much as expanding service.
Amen. The thing that sticks with me 35 or 40 years after being a regular bus rider in Lexington was the waiting, waiting, waiting and more waiting for the bus to come along. At my current age and physical condition that would go way beyond inconvenience to actual physical hardship.

But yeah, it boggles the mind to think what could be done to improve and expand the bus system with the total $$$ involved in the streetcar project.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2011, 12:42 PM
 
Location: "Daytonnati"
4,241 posts, read 7,171,068 times
Reputation: 3014
^
You can take the conveyor belt approach to running a bus line, like they did in Chicago, where the waits used to be really short between busses, or you can take the railroad approach, where the waits are longer. I think you are going to wait, one way or another, which is why people prefer cars. Only a few places were its more of a hassle to drive than take a bus or train.

@@@

Anway, heres an article on streetcar expansion in New Orleans, which probably isnt a good example since Cincy and New Orleans are different cities.
A Desire Named Streetcar....and they cite what I've read before, about ridership increasing on streetcars vs busses:

Quote:
People simply like streetcars better than buses—studies suggest that ridership typically increases by about one-third when streetcars replace a bus route.
I just find this fascinating. Two forms of transit, no real superiority of one over the other in terms of service or frequency or schedules (and busses have the cheaper operating & captial cost), but there is apparently a preference for the one on rails.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2011, 03:20 PM
 
10,135 posts, read 27,460,769 times
Reputation: 8400
People have decided: private cars is what they want. Here's one of many many reasons:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=az4qASdPD4Y
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2011, 04:16 PM
 
2,491 posts, read 4,466,303 times
Reputation: 1415
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wilson513 View Post
People have decided: private cars is what they want. Here's one of many many reasons:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=az4qASdPD4Y


Probably the single most ridiculous thing I've seen on this forum to date.

First: Are you actually suggesting that public transportation is a bad idea in Manhattan and that residents there should each have a private car? Second: Your fallacious conclusion is so elementary and generalizing that you're actually devaluing your entire argument. That's like arguing that people have decided rail transportation is what they want due to road rage and idiot drivers. Tell me, how many fatal auto accidents have we had in Greater Cincinnati just this month?

Just from the last 24 hours in the Tri-state:

Driver gets 7 years for running over, killing boy | Cincinnati.com | cincinnati.com

DUI checkpoint Friday night | Cincinnati.com | cincinnati.com

EB Ronald Reagan Highway reopens after crash | Cincinnati.com | cincinnati.com

Murder charges in deadly Downtown crash | Cincinnati.com | cincinnati.com

Victim identified in West Chester crash | Cincinnati.com | cincinnati.com

Loveland grad dies in crash | Cincinnati.com | cincinnati.com

Green Township chase ends in crash | Cincinnati.com | cincinnati.com

Yet you troll youtube in order cherry pick an NYC story about a subway food fight? Unreal

Last edited by abr7rmj; 03-24-2011 at 05:25 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2011, 08:42 PM
 
Location: On the Rails in Northern NJ
12,380 posts, read 26,840,807 times
Reputation: 4581
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wilson513 View Post
People have decided: private cars is what they want. Here's one of many many reasons:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=az4qASdPD4Y
Fights like that are rare on the Subway or Bus , its usually staged or defused before it gets to an explosion point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Ohio > Cincinnati

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:44 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top