Amazon Hiring

[flashes1]

Originally Posted by kjbrill

I pretty much agree with your statements. Just look at the annual percapita income values for Kentucky versus Ohio. That doesn't mean Ohio doesn't have poverty as it surely does.

But to say people are leaving ohio in droves is all wet. Our metro areas are increasing in population. This doesn't happen because people are fleeing the state.

Yea, the Kentucky poster writes a lot of blatantly false general statements.

[SWOH]

Originally Posted by InLondon

Ohio's population isn't growing, at least nothing like it once was. Look it up.

True. You are correct that growth in Ohio pre-1960 happened at a faster rate than growth post-1960.

I don't understand the attitude behind posting the emoji though.

[Yac]

Fight misinformation with information, opinions with fact. You've been doing good so far, not counting the now deleted posts.
Remember the mods are not here to make sure what posters post is factual, we're here to make sure the discussion is calm and respectful. It is up to you, other members, to prove someone wrong.
Yac.

[Chemistry_Guy]

Originally Posted by Wilson513

I think it is settled science that lower rates means more tax revenues.

It is not settled science at all. There is plenty of debate as to our actual position on the Laffer Curve. Laffer curve - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Keynesians say that peak revenue would occur somewhere around a 70% tax rate, while just about everyone else says the peak is quite a bit lower.