Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Ohio > Cincinnati
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-28-2017, 07:23 AM
 
6,295 posts, read 11,007,815 times
Reputation: 3085

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by PerryMason614 View Post
Another "Top X" list ... Yeah, that proves Cincinnati's great! Rah-rah-rah-rah-rah-rah-rah!!!
LOL




Naah - I don't think one thing has anything to do with the other. Dayton has always had a reasonable amount of tech by virtue of the Air Force base and its ties to aviation. And then there's Lexis-Nexis. I think that is a bigger driver than anything else.

I don't think people looking at where to expand are saying, "Yeah, that Dayton is a really hot town now that it's part of a CMSA! We have to jump in on it!" If that were the case, Cleveland would still be the Number 12 DMA.
I do agree that whether or not Dayton is part of a CSMA is not likely to impact the decision a business potentially considering Dayton for relocation or start up purposes. At least in most cases. It is just a designation used by the Census when two metro areas in close proximity to one another become tied due to the commuting patterns of working people and I think to some degree economic ties.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-29-2017, 03:55 PM
 
908 posts, read 1,409,066 times
Reputation: 764
In the 90's and 00's, when Akron had a CMSA with Cleveland, while Cleveland's businesses were failing, Cleveland decided to steal a whole bunch of Akron's businesses under the guise of "keeping it in the area", and basically just kept stealing Akron's success in an attempt to stop failing. Dayton should be really wary of being in a CMSA with Cincinnati.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2017, 05:08 PM
 
Location: Cincinnati (Norwood)
3,530 posts, read 4,995,912 times
Reputation: 1929
Quote:
Originally Posted by dxdtdemon View Post
In the 90's and 00's, when Akron had a CMSA with Cleveland, while Cleveland's businesses were failing, Cleveland decided to steal a whole bunch of Akron's businesses under the guise of "keeping it in the area", and basically just kept stealing Akron's success in an attempt to stop failing. Dayton should be really wary of being in a CMSA with Cincinnati.
Although the impending merger of Cincinnati with Dayton ("CIN-DAY") is important, this thread centers on construction projects, primarily in Cincinnati, Dayton and Columbus. The Site Selection magazine articles from the last two years (linked in Post #1 and #5) are the focus of discussion here. However, there is another thread,"Cincinnati MSA grows," where CMSA's are legitimate points for discussion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Ohio > Cincinnati

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top