Which would be the Most Important City in the South (fit in, fence)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
A list of cities from other Regions that are not the most important in their regions. Question is if these were in the South would they be the Dominant city Culturally and financially?
Vote for each on the basis of yes or no and you can make multiple choices
A list of cities from other Regions that are not the most important in their regions. Question is if these were in the South would they be the Dominant city Culturally and financially?
Vote for each on the basis of yes or no and you can make multiple choices
I don't think no city outside of NYC, LA, DC, CHI and maybe the Bay area could move down south and dominate. I'm on the fence with SF.
Location: Austin, TX/Chicago, IL/Houston, TX/Washington, DC
10,138 posts, read 15,971,048 times
Reputation: 4047
Actually to be honest, most of these cities aren't even culturally fit for the south. Picking which one would fit in most is a suicide task, because they'll all stand out like more than a sore thumb but more like a broken off thumb.
But actually Washington DC, would be most fit for it, since it has somewhat of a North/South past.
The South does not have nothing going on for themselves per say, except maybe for Dallas and Miami. The South would benefit tremendously from the cities from the West and North.
^ I don't know about that, Houston has A LOT going for itself as well, you ever heard of oil? lol.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.