Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: The city with the best mountainous backdrop is...
Los Angeles 18 14.29%
San Diego 2 1.59%
Portland, OR 3 2.38%
Seattle 39 30.95%
Las Vegas, NV 3 2.38%
Phoenix 6 4.76%
Salt Lake City 18 14.29%
Denver 17 13.49%
Boise, ID 2 1.59%
Asheville, NC 3 2.38%
Chattanooga, TN 1 0.79%
Knoxville, TN 3 2.38%
Charleston, WV 0 0%
Cincinnati, OH 1 0.79%
Pittsburgh, PA 6 4.76%
Other (list in your post) 4 3.17%
Voters: 126. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-07-2010, 10:40 AM
 
1,512 posts, read 8,165,333 times
Reputation: 1183

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by caphillsea77 View Post
Hmmm.... interesting poll selections. Cincinnatti has got hills, definitely not mountains. Pittsburgh and Charleston WV have big hills, but not mountains.

Albuquerque has spectacular mountains on the edge of town, and Vancouver (very famous mountain setting) was missed.
That's why there is a others option.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-07-2010, 12:01 PM
 
Location: Charleston
515 posts, read 1,058,869 times
Reputation: 275
Quote:
Originally Posted by caphillsea77 View Post
Hmmm.... interesting poll selections. Cincinnatti has got hills, definitely not mountains. Pittsburgh and Charleston WV have big hills, but not mountains.

Albuquerque has spectacular mountains on the edge of town, and Vancouver (very famous mountain setting) was missed.
Yes Albuqurque has a nice mountain backdrop but I hear the panorama
around Las Cruces is even more impressive.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...Las_Cruces.jpg
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2010, 12:12 PM
 
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
3,390 posts, read 4,949,410 times
Reputation: 2049
Salt Lake City and LA mountain backdrops are beauts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2010, 12:51 PM
 
3,622 posts, read 5,593,117 times
Reputation: 4322
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMT View Post
It's funny how some people dismiss Salt Lake City just because it doesn't have much of a downtown skyline. That's not the topic of this thread. SLC does have a spectacular mountain backdrop that many people ignore because it's, well, in Utah. There aren't many major cities where one can be in downtown one minute and on the slopes of a world-class ski resort 30 minutes later.

In addition, SLC is surrounded by mountains, literally. They're north of town, east of town, south of town, and west of town. They're inescapable.
Definitely. When I visit I am continually blown away at the massiveness and beauty of the mountains. In the winter they are brilliant white and sometimes look like they are floating above the clouds. In the summer they are covered with green. They loom and you can't escape them no matter where you are in SLC. In LA and other cities you almost have to be out of the city to see the backdrop.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2010, 01:07 PM
 
Location: Spain
1,854 posts, read 4,919,808 times
Reputation: 973
Quote:
Originally Posted by lyra33 View Post
Definitely. When I visit I am continually blown away at the massiveness and beauty of the mountains. In the winter they are brilliant white and sometimes look like they are floating above the clouds. In the summer they are covered with green. They loom and you can't escape them no matter where you are in SLC. In LA and other cities you almost have to be out of the city to see the backdrop.
How is that physically possible considering there are mountains within the city limits of Los Angeles?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2010, 01:07 PM
 
Location: Austin/Houston
2,930 posts, read 5,270,124 times
Reputation: 2266
I would say LA wins this one but the picturesque view is often toppled by nasty smog, so I'm going to hand it to Seattle. Denver also has a nice backdrop, but the mountains are too far away to make as much of an impact.

Yall are lucky Colorado Springs isn't on the list. Nothing can top a 14,000 foot Pikes Peak and Cheyenne Mountain in the backdrop.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2010, 01:20 PM
 
6,350 posts, read 11,583,688 times
Reputation: 6312
I picked Knoxville because of, well, boosterism. But also because the mountains are at a distance it gives a sense of perspective. Same thing with Denver. The flatness in the foreground makes the mountains more striking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2010, 01:29 PM
 
3,622 posts, read 5,593,117 times
Reputation: 4322
Quote:
Originally Posted by PDX_LAX View Post
How is that physically possible considering there are mountains within the city limits of Los Angeles?
When I have drove around "in" LA I didn't notice the mountains as much. In SLC you are set on the mountains so you are more aware of the mountains. The pictures of LA against the mountains are definitely stunning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2010, 02:41 PM
 
3,338 posts, read 6,896,892 times
Reputation: 2848
Salt Lake has some beautiful mountain views around their valley, there is no doubt about that fact, but if you live there, as I once did, you pay for it because that valley has some of the most polluted air in the USA during Winter inversions and Summer air pollution can almost be just as bad. It is like SLC Valley has more people than it is meant to have, but the local governments there push, push, push for more growth which impacts the air and general quality of life. I can think of almost a dozen other cities in the West that have mountain backdrops just as impressive or beautiful, it is all in the eye of the beholder.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2010, 05:18 PM
 
3,622 posts, read 5,593,117 times
Reputation: 4322
Yes, the (SLC) winter inversion can be bad. Any large city will have issues with pollution. Las Vegas does not necessarily have an issue with cloud inversions, moreso with the wind kicking up dirt that traps pollution in the air. It kind hovers until we get rain to clear it out, which is...never?

LA and several CA cities top the list for most polluted cities. I think cities that are driving cities tend to be the most polluted. Although SLC tends to make the list; SLC's inversion is more of a geographical issue that occurs mostly in winter. Hopefully now that they are investing in public transit it will help alleviate some of the pollution.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top