Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Economic viable second tier metro's in the North?
Milwaukee 23 29.87%
Minneapolis 48 62.34%
Indianapolis 21 27.27%
Buffalo 5 6.49%
Pittsburgh 36 46.75%
Albany 5 6.49%
Rochester 9 11.69%
Syracuse 7 9.09%
Columbus 28 36.36%
Grand Rapids 9 11.69%
Cincinnati 14 18.18%
Others (List below) 6 7.79%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 77. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-22-2010, 08:27 AM
 
Location: Austin, TX/Chicago, IL/Houston, TX/Washington, DC
10,138 posts, read 16,032,687 times
Reputation: 4047

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ckhthankgod View Post
Actually, Albany's metro has grown in population to around 1 million people and is becoming a tech center in Upstate NY. Grand Rapids is the most stable economy in Michigan and has been for a while, as it's metro has over 1 million people now. I'd put Rochester ahead of Buffalo, because it has plenty of smaller start ups there and is more of a white collar area than Buffalo. Monroe County(Rochester) actually gained 22,000 people in the 90's and has held pretty mcuh steady through the first decade of the 2000's. Syracuse has the lowest unemployment rate usually out of the NY State metros, but like Rochester, has more smaller companies/start ups and is also in transition.
Oh yes, you are right, ranking in a numerical sense would seem a mess now.

I guess the tier system will apply now. You make good points, just one question though. Wasn't Ann Arbor the best economy in Michigan? Or is it the fastest growing with Grand Rapids being the most stable?

Quote:
Originally Posted by west336 View Post
Right. Maybe you redefine the tiers as:

1st:
New York
Chicago
Philadelphia
Washington D.C.
Boston

2nd:
Detroit
Minneapolis/St. Paul
Baltimore
Pittsburgh
Cleveland
St. Louis

3rd:
Columbus
Cincinnati
Buffalo
Indianapolis
Kansas City
Milwaukee
I'm not New Yorker, but there's something about this that just strikes me as odd.

From a Chicagoans point of view, I do not see Boston on the same tier as Chicago. (not a knock but the truth)

Tier One:
- New York City

Tier Two:
- Chicago
- Los Angeles
- Washington DC

From tier 3 point on, Boston and Philadelphia can join in the fun along with other cities that belong in that tier. Haha.

But I think you were just demonstrating what the poster you quoted had meant? I don't know for sure though.

And PS: I don't want to use up another post in that other density thread so I will respond here for that. I was just joking man, it was an early morning joke lol. Minneapolis doesn't have to be involved in that thread, I was just saying that for fun.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-22-2010, 08:32 AM
 
Location: Cleveland bound with MPLS in the rear-view
5,509 posts, read 11,870,451 times
Reputation: 2501
No, I know you're not an instigator....I just found the concept of the thread ridiculous and instead of seeing that at the top of the forum list again and again I thought it'd be just as arbitrary to argue about beaches in the Rust Belt
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2010, 09:28 AM
 
1,588 posts, read 4,060,354 times
Reputation: 900
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
I am still really struggling with minneapolis among DC/Bos/Philly - it is half the size where it is almost exactely the size (population/economic output) of the tier 3s - still seems a stretch to me but heading there
I agree.

My "northern" tier ranking resembles my national tier ranking.
Tier 1
New York City

Tier 2
Washington D.C.
Chicago

Tier 3
Boston
Philadelphia

Tier 4

Detroit
Minneapolis

Pittsburgh

Tier 5
St. Louis
Cleveland
Kansas City
Cincinnati

The Rest

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2010, 09:39 AM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,888,203 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackOut View Post
I agree.

My "northern" tier ranking resembles my national tier ranking.
Tier 1
New York City

Tier 2
Washington D.C.
Chicago

Tier 3
Boston
Philadelphia

Tier 4
Detroit
Minneapolis
Pittsburgh

Tier 5
St. Louis
Cleveland
Kansas City
Cincinnati

The Rest

I think this makes a lot of sense

NYC is a class of its own

DC (on political might) and Chicago (on size) distinguish themselves

Bos/Philly - size and economic power are a notch above
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2010, 09:54 AM
 
Location: metro ATL
8,180 posts, read 14,857,597 times
Reputation: 2698
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackOut View Post
I agree.

My "northern" tier ranking resembles my national tier ranking.
Tier 1
New York City

Tier 2
Washington D.C.
Chicago

Tier 3
Boston
Philadelphia

Tier 4

Detroit
Minneapolis

Pittsburgh

Tier 5
St. Louis
Cleveland
Kansas City
Cincinnati

The Rest

I could get with that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2010, 11:11 AM
 
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
1,374 posts, read 3,253,246 times
Reputation: 872
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackOut View Post
I agree.

My "northern" tier ranking resembles my national tier ranking.
Tier 1
New York City

Tier 2
Washington D.C.
Chicago

Tier 3
Boston
Philadelphia

Tier 4
Detroit
Minneapolis
Pittsburgh

Tier 5
St. Louis
Cleveland
Kansas City
Cincinnati

The Rest

These superficial tiers being posted by some users are largely inaccurate.
Cleveland, as a prime example, would certainly not be ( and shouldn't be ) considered anything less than a 1st tier city on these lists.
Many people are unaware of just how viable a city that Cleveland remains to be.
Yes, the city has experienced it's share of problems, but it is still a major contender amongst the largest and most important of all US cities.
There's still a sizable "FORTUNE 500 presence" in the city, and it is an ever acclaimed healthcare destination with the "world renowned" Cleveland Clinic Foundation & University Hospitals, both of which have developed an important partnership with Case Western Reserve University, resulting in a powerhouse of medical research and biosciences.
Add to this, Cleveland still retains a vast collection of cultural "gems" ( Museums galore, world renowned orchestra ) from it's historic and rich past, a legacy that has been held for Clevelander's for many future generations.
There is also an abundance of urban renewal occurring throughout the city and it's vast suburbs ...
Don't count out a city with a legacy like Cleveland's just yet!

Last edited by JohnDBaumgardner; 07-22-2010 at 11:14 AM.. Reason: x
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2010, 11:33 AM
 
8,276 posts, read 11,908,519 times
Reputation: 10080
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackOut View Post
I agree.

My "northern" tier ranking resembles my national tier ranking.
Tier 1
New York City

Tier 2
Washington D.C.
Chicago

Tier 3
Boston
Philadelphia

Tier 4

Detroit
Minneapolis

Pittsburgh

Tier 5
St. Louis
Cleveland
Kansas City
Cincinnati

The Rest

You left out LA, for one thing...

In terms of the OP's choices of cities, Minneapolis is really too large for this gruping, especially since it's usually grouped with St. Paul; in terms of tiers, Minn-St. Paul is a Top 20 area, possibly in the Top 15, depending upon who's doing the arguing..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2010, 11:38 AM
 
358 posts, read 754,666 times
Reputation: 274
Minneapolis
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2010, 11:55 AM
 
Location: Cleveland bound with MPLS in the rear-view
5,509 posts, read 11,870,451 times
Reputation: 2501
Quote:
Originally Posted by MassVt View Post
You left out LA, for one thing...

In terms of the OP's choices of cities, Minneapolis is really too large for this gruping, especially since it's usually grouped with St. Paul; in terms of tiers, Minn-St. Paul is a Top 20 area, possibly in the Top 15, depending upon who's doing the arguing..
Northern cities only.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2010, 12:18 PM
 
Location: moving again
4,383 posts, read 16,759,177 times
Reputation: 1681
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackOut View Post
I agree.

My "northern" tier ranking resembles my national tier ranking.
Tier 1
New York City

Tier 2
Washington D.C.
Chicago

Tier 3
Boston
Philadelphia

Tier 4

Detroit
Minneapolis

Pittsburgh

Tier 5
St. Louis
Cleveland
Kansas City
Cincinnati

The Rest

And Baltimore?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:35 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top