Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which is more urban and has more of a "big city" feel?
Houston 69 29.11%
Seattle 168 70.89%
Voters: 237. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 08-22-2010, 12:35 PM
 
3,674 posts, read 8,658,751 times
Reputation: 3086

Advertisements

I find it hilarious that this discussion has to center on skyline height for Houston to even be considered. It displays very keenly the general ignorance our posters from Texas seem to have regarding urbanity.

I'm not saying Houston is a bad place. I'm not even expressing a preference, because I live in LA in suburban housing when I could easily move to Seattle.

What I am stating is that you can add ten thousand mile high towers to Houston. It would not change a thing. It is still a giant, sprawling sunbelt suburb. In the future, who knows; as infrastructure becomes older and texans are faced with the severe difficulty of updating and maintaining in an area of critical overpopulation and resource scarcity, doubtless there will be infill. And at least someone down there has to realize that a simple train with its own right of way is cheaper and faster than sitting in gridlock.

Until then, as per the question in this thread's title, Seattle is the more urban of areas.

 
Old 08-22-2010, 12:38 PM
 
18 posts, read 81,566 times
Reputation: 22
surely seattle
 
Old 08-22-2010, 12:45 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,929,248 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by coldwine View Post
It displays very keenly the general ignorance our posters from Texas seem to have regarding urbanity.

again no one is claiming that Houston is more urban. If I am wrong show me one Houston poster that said so

I don't think you read any of our posts

We trounce Seattle in almost any category imaginable.
 
Old 08-22-2010, 01:22 PM
 
Location: Upper East Side of Texas
12,498 posts, read 26,979,445 times
Reputation: 4890
Quote:
Originally Posted by cabasse View Post
a simple "i disagree" would've sufficed... i'll give you a few reasons for my opinion; uptown houston is spread over a much wider area, bellevue is also on the water/mountain backdrop, etc. ut h has 3 taller buildings.

where are your ridership figures from?
3 significantly taller buildings at that.
 
Old 08-22-2010, 01:24 PM
 
Location: Upper East Side of Texas
12,498 posts, read 26,979,445 times
Reputation: 4890
Quote:
Originally Posted by HtownLove View Post
But but but if you multiply by Tacoma and divide my Walla Walla and you factor in the University of Puget Sound you get...


lol you don't have to tell me. Nothing in and around Seattle is on par with Houston's size.

big city feel my butt cheeks
I don't even know if I'd stick Bellevue, Wa. up against Houston's Greenway Plaza much less Uptown/Galleria.
 
Old 08-22-2010, 01:42 PM
 
1,717 posts, read 4,647,570 times
Reputation: 979
Quote:
Originally Posted by HtownLove View Post
again no one is claiming that Houston is more urban. If I am wrong show me one Houston poster that said so

I don't think you read any of our posts

We trounce Seattle in almost any category imaginable.
Get out more. Seriously.
 
Old 08-22-2010, 02:14 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,929,248 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Loney View Post
Get out more. Seriously.

Everytime I get out it is serious I am sure that I have been to more countries than you. I am sure that I have dined in more world class cities than you.

Its funny how people may visit LA and San Fransisco and suddenly believe they are a world class expert on what cities are
 
Old 08-22-2010, 03:54 PM
 
Location: Houston
6,870 posts, read 14,850,609 times
Reputation: 5891
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro Matt View Post
I don't even know if I'd stick Bellevue, Wa. up against Houston's Greenway Plaza much less Uptown/Galleria.
Bellevue may equal like Greenspoint or Westchase but definitely not Uptown Houston. I've read that Uptown Houston rivals Downtown Denver.
 
Old 08-22-2010, 04:17 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,929,248 times
Reputation: 7752
Biggest US skylines:

Link: http://www.library.tudelft.nl/~egram/skylines.htm

1. New York, NY (incl. Jersey City, NJ)
2. Chicago, IL
3. Houston, TX
4. Los Angeles, CA
5. San Francisco, CA
6. Atlanta, GA
7. Miami, FL (incl. Miami Beach, FL)
8. Dallas, TX
9. Boston, MA
10. Philadelphia, PA (incl. Camden, NJ)
 
Old 08-22-2010, 05:26 PM
 
Location: Pasadena
882 posts, read 2,244,491 times
Reputation: 466
Oh my god. Seattle has more urbanity and pedestrian-friendliness than Houston, or any sprawling metro would desire. Houston has the big city status that Seattle would desire. Whats so hard to comprehend. Seattle is more urban, Houston is the bigger city.

Seattle has more walkable neighborhoods, and a more urban atmosphere, but that doesn't translate to major city status even if it gives off the feeling of a bigger city, so I'd still prefer Houston. I think more people would prefer Seattle given a choice, but at the end of the day Seattle is still a metro of 3.4 million while Houston is a metro of 6 million. Houston's in another league, and has a brighter future, not to say Seattle doesn't.

Seattle's skyline has a better backdrop, and scenery. It has the density, and great architecture. Its stunning, and arguably a top US 5 skyline. Houston has multiple skylines, a lot more height and is impressive when taking into consideration all of it. Its different clusters means that it has less density. It has been argued as a top 5 US skyline, but is always considered a top 10 usually.

Height and quantity isn't everything, so using that as a main point when comparing skylines will tick off CD's density-urban loving members.

Also, while Downtown Houston isn't as urban as most major city's downtowns, due to various reasons, it still doesn't deserve being labled as suburban. Anyplace that I can watch a proffessional sports game, enjoy a proffessional performing arts play or concert, hit a club, pub, or bar, visit a doctor, shop from various stores, get at least some form of groceries, stroll around a park, eat out from a restaurant, check out a book,get a haircut or a spa treatment, go to a gym, get my prescriptions, watch a movie, have public transportation as an option SHOULD be considered urban. Considering I can do all of that plus MORE, Downtown Houston is urban. There are people living there, and its a major employment center.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:42 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top