Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-27-2010, 10:57 AM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,929,248 times
Reputation: 7752

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spade View Post
the hell are you talking about?

just checking to see if you are up on your history of city development.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-27-2010, 10:58 AM
 
Location: Atlanta
2,848 posts, read 6,434,352 times
Reputation: 1743
Quote:
Originally Posted by Akhenaton06 View Post


































































Wow. Downtown Charleston really is nice. Too bad it's so small. If it were a lot bigger it really would have a shot at number1.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2010, 11:01 AM
 
Location: New Orleans, United States
4,230 posts, read 10,480,380 times
Reputation: 1444
Quote:
Originally Posted by grindin View Post
Tim McGraw is from Louisiana anyhow. Northern Louisiana at that, so I still say he's pretty southern.
I fully agree that he's southern, but where are you more likely to find people dressed like that out of AL, AR, GA, LA, MS, OK, TN, TX, etc. That's a very poor interpretation of what "southern" is. The country music thing is more of a pop-culture than it is a regional culture anyway. Anywhere that the music is popular, you may find examples of that culture.

At least that's how I see it.

--------------------------------------------------------
I have to agree with the office park statement too, to an extent anyway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2010, 11:04 AM
 
Location: America
5,092 posts, read 8,842,323 times
Reputation: 1971
Quote:
Originally Posted by grindin View Post
I'm like the FedEx man. Swoop in, deliver what I have to say, get out and go on to my next destination.
kneegrow please....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2010, 11:06 AM
 
2,531 posts, read 6,247,355 times
Reputation: 1315
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestbankNOLA View Post
I fully agree that he's southern, but where are you more likely to find people dressed like that out of AL, AR, GA, LA, MS, OK, TN, TX, etc. That's a very poor interpretation of what "southern" is. The country music thing is more of a pop-culture than it is a regional culture anyway. Anywhere that the music is popular, you may find examples of that culture.

At least that's how I see it.

--------------------------------------------------------
I have to agree with the office park statement too, to an extent anyway.

I agree. My point is a lot of people have trouble realizing there is more than one "South" and we're made up of several sub-regions like any other part of the country. It's weird to me how people are aware of a Mid-Atlantic and New England and can collectively classify it as the "Northeast". Or can separate the Pac NW from California and know it's all collectively the West Coast.

But for some reason, people still insist the South is all one monolithic paintbrush. Why, I don't know. There are differences in climate, certain aspects of culture, terrain, etc. in the various subregions of the South. I know you probably get annoyed whenever you look at a movie based in New Orleans and the accents are all wrong. I know I do, and I'm not even from that area, LOL.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2010, 11:07 AM
 
Location: metro ATL
8,180 posts, read 14,857,597 times
Reputation: 2698
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galounger View Post
Wow. Downtown Charleston really is nice. Too bad it's so small. If it were a lot bigger it really would have a shot at number1.
DT Charleston overall isn't really so small, but the historic district that most tourists are confined to (south of Calhoun) is a little less than half the size of DT overall.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2010, 11:09 AM
 
Location: New Orleans, United States
4,230 posts, read 10,480,380 times
Reputation: 1444
Quote:
Originally Posted by grindin View Post
It's weird to me how people are aware of a Mid-Atlantic and New England and can collectively classify it as the "Northeast". Or can separate the Pac NW from California and know it's all collectively the West Coast. But for some reason, people still insist the South is all one monolithic paintbrush.
Exactly how I feel about it. It's even stranger when people from or who live in the south can't make the distinction.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2010, 11:11 AM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,929,248 times
Reputation: 7752
Why on Earth would people expect builing patterns in cities like these, (settlement dates follow):
NYC -1624
Boston- 1630
San Francisco -1776
Chicago- 1770
Philadelphia- Mid 1600s
DC- Late 1700's
Baltimore-1729

to be the same as cities which grew up in a much different time:
Houston-1837
Dallas- 1856

Just shows a lack of reasoning to me
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2010, 11:11 AM
 
Location: New Orleans, United States
4,230 posts, read 10,480,380 times
Reputation: 1444
Quote:
Originally Posted by Akhenaton06 View Post
DT Charleston overall isn't really so small, but the historic district that most tourists are confined to (south of Calhoun) is a little less than half the size of DT overall.
What are the boundaries of Downtown Charleston?

Quote:
Originally Posted by HtownLove View Post
Why on Earth would people expect builing patterns in cities like these, (settlement dates follow):
NYC -1624
Boston- 1630
San Francisco -1776
Chicago- 1770
Philadelphia- Mid 1600s
DC- Late 1700's
Baltimore-1729

to be the same as cities which grew up in a much different time:
Houston-1837
Dallas- 1856

Just shows a lack of reasoning to me
A city settled in 1856 would probably be developed very similar to one settled in 1726 at first. The difference is made depending on what time period the city actually grew. Had Philly stayed stagnant from 1680 up until 1980 and just boomed overnight how do you think it would look?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2010, 11:13 AM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,929,248 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by grindin View Post
I agree. My point is a lot of people have trouble realizing there is more than one "South"

I think a lot of people think the south, deep south and the confederate states are all one and the same
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:10 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top