Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-11-2010, 03:16 AM
 
Location: Tower of Heaven
4,023 posts, read 7,368,221 times
Reputation: 1450

Advertisements

But no Florida cities it's very strange I think.
I know Miami added 73,000 people but the others ? Maybe the huge florida pop growth is spread out into many florida cities and not 1 or 2 of them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-11-2010, 03:18 AM
 
Location: Austin, TX/Chicago, IL/Houston, TX/Washington, DC
10,138 posts, read 16,031,388 times
Reputation: 4047
Quote:
Originally Posted by PDX_LAX View Post
Haha nah, I only meant that Dallas would add more than Houston and L.A. would probably add more than New York. Only my guess though.
Yeah, it will be tight to see the 2010 Census next summer when it comes out. It will finally end a lot of the chaotic "my metro is going to add this" argument haha.
I hope whatever needs to be added in for whichever metro gets it done.

Also for Detroit, I am actually hoping that they drop population to reach a more stabilized unemployment rate and pick up faster economically.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2010, 03:23 AM
 
Location: Tower of Heaven
4,023 posts, read 7,368,221 times
Reputation: 1450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Awesome Danny View Post
Yeah, it will be tight to see the 2010 Census next summer when it comes out. It will finally end a lot of the chaotic "my metro is going to add this" argument haha.
I hope whatever needs to be added in for whichever metro gets it done.

Also for Detroit, I am actually hoping that they drop population to reach a more stabilized unemployment rate and pick up faster economically.
Detroit will have to lose so many people to have an unemployment rate below 8% o_o I guess Detroit people will go to the South, I saw an article about that some months ago..Apparently their favorite city is Atlanta, followed by Houston.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2010, 03:54 AM
 
Location: Hernando County, FL
8,489 posts, read 20,631,470 times
Reputation: 5397
Quote:
Originally Posted by RenaudFR View Post
But no Florida cities it's very strange I think.
I know Miami added 73,000 people but the others ? Maybe the huge florida pop growth is spread out into many florida cities and not 1 or 2 of them.
You almost never see Florida cities on these lists due to how the state is governed. You have smaller city centers which are the incorporated part of the city and what is counted in these numbers but you also have the unincorporated areas just outside the city boundary where the majority of the population is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2010, 04:21 AM
 
14,256 posts, read 26,922,186 times
Reputation: 4565
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike peterson View Post
you almost never see florida cities on these lists due to how the state is governed. You have smaller city centers which are the incorporated part of the city and what is counted in these numbers but you also have the unincorporated areas just outside the city boundary where the majority of the population is.
That's exactly how it is in Florida!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2010, 04:38 AM
 
Location: Tower of Heaven
4,023 posts, read 7,368,221 times
Reputation: 1450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Peterson View Post
You almost never see Florida cities on these lists due to how the state is governed. You have smaller city centers which are the incorporated part of the city and what is counted in these numbers but you also have the unincorporated areas just outside the city boundary where the majority of the population is.
You mean it's a very suburban state ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2010, 05:08 AM
 
Location: Hernando County, FL
8,489 posts, read 20,631,470 times
Reputation: 5397
Quote:
Originally Posted by RenaudFR View Post
You mean it's a very suburban state ?
It is more to do with how the government is run. The unincorporated areas are mainly governed by the county while the incorporated areas are governed by the city.

To give a reference, if NYC was governed the same way the city would probably be from midtown down through Wall St with upper Manhattan and the 4 other boroughs being the unincorporated areas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2010, 05:22 AM
 
Location: 30-40°N 90-100°W
13,809 posts, read 26,544,700 times
Reputation: 6790
In percent terms, going by one of the sources you gave, the city that declined the most is Jolley, Iowa. Granted it declined from 54 to 31, but in Iowa any incorporated settlement is a city. Of towns with more than a 1,000 Pass Christian, Mississippi looks to have had the worst decline. I wonder if that's Katrina related. Of cities over 10,000 Long Beach, Mississippi had the worst decline in the decade. Of cities over 100,000 it's New Orleans as the most declined.

Probing the dimensions of decline - Business First of Buffalo

In percentage terms the fastest growing city is Heritage Creek, Kentucky. (Previously called Minor Lane Heights) From 2000-2009 it apparently went from 11 to 346. As you may have figured Kentucky is one of the states that lists all incorporated settlements as cities. The second fastest is Maricopa, Arizona. Maricopa might be more interesting as it went from 1,622, if I did the math right, to 44,691. You have to look a bit to get to a city of over a 100,000 when it comes to high growth in percentage terms. Still McKinney, Texas apparently more than doubled in the period going from around 54,300 to 127,672. Of cities that had over a 100,000 in 2000 Gilbert, Arizona and North Las Vegas look to have grown the most in percentage terms. Although Raleigh, North Carolina and Cape Coral, Florida also look to have had significant growth and I think are less-dependent on a larger city.

Probing the dimensions of decline - Business First of Buffalo

Last edited by Thomas R.; 09-11-2010 at 05:33 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2010, 07:11 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
787 posts, read 1,941,956 times
Reputation: 379
Quote:
Originally Posted by RenaudFR View Post
Maybe I'm wrong but I can imagine Los Angeles lose population this decade, the economy of the city is so bad, and it won't heal before some years..In California this decade San Francisco and San Jose could be the winners, they did better during the recession.
Acutally, the Census Bureau is notorious for undercounting LA's population.

The Department of Finance for the state of California has a much better track record for accurate population estimates within the state. Based on their estimates, the CITY of LOS ANGELES between 2000 and 2009 actually INCREASED by 355,000.

E-4 Population Estimates, 2001-10 - California Department of Finance

The Dept. of Finance's most recent estimate for the City of Los Angeles (Jan. 1st 2010) is 4,094,000 which is an increase of about 400,000 from the 2000 Census.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2010, 07:58 AM
 
Location: Tower of Heaven
4,023 posts, read 7,368,221 times
Reputation: 1450
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCal35 View Post
Acutally, the Census Bureau is notorious for undercounting LA's population.

The Department of Finance for the state of California has a much better track record for accurate population estimates within the state. Based on their estimates, the CITY of LOS ANGELES between 2000 and 2009 actually INCREASED by 355,000.

E-4 Population Estimates, 2001-10 - California Department of Finance

The Dept. of Finance's most recent estimate for the City of Los Angeles (Jan. 1st 2010) is 4,094,000 which is an increase of about 400,000 from the 2000 Census.
I will wait the 2010 census next year, we'll be sure
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:16 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top