|
View Poll Results: Which city is more urban at street level?
|
|
Philadelphia
|
  
|
129 |
42.16% |
|
Chicago
|
  
|
177 |
57.84% |
 |
|
|

10-14-2010, 03:24 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Toronto
1,662 posts, read 2,074,913 times
Reputation: 683
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeaconJ
Did you ask the question just so you could try to shoot down anyone who disagrees with you?
Both are very urban, but I agree that Chicago wins this one.
|
If he gives some reasoning to his answer rather than claiming it's simply an "easy" decision I won't shoot him down for it. All these one word answers are irrelevant, that's why I have a poll in the first place. Simply saying "Chicago" doesn't accomplish anything.
|
|

10-14-2010, 03:29 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: ITP - City of Atlanta Proper
5,677 posts, read 4,610,788 times
Reputation: 2809
|
|
|
Ladarron style:
Chicago
|
|

10-14-2010, 03:30 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Boston, MA
290 posts, read 439,617 times
Reputation: 115
|
|
|
|
|

10-14-2010, 03:40 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
11,180 posts, read 10,307,166 times
Reputation: 3701
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AJNEOA
I think that's because of the housing stock. The row houses across thousands of streets makes Philly feel very urban. Chicago seems to have a different type of housing stock (and I'm no expert on Chicago, so correct me if I'm wrong) that leans more to detached housing (with very little space between residences).
|
Also Chicago makes a huge emphasis on highrises. At least more than Philadelphia and all the buildings are a plus to the street when it comes to interaction along the Lake Michigan coast.
|
|

10-14-2010, 03:45 PM
|
|
|
|
945 posts, read 805,041 times
Reputation: 678
|
|
|
Philadelphia is certainly one ot the top urban (~top 5 in US) centers and in some areas has a mini-Manhattan feel, but it doesn't compare to the scope of Chicago. Yes, Loop is dense, but really when I think of density in Chicago I think of the broad swath from Old Town to Rogers Park. There are section of the South Side with high-grade density as well.
|
|

10-14-2010, 03:59 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Chicago - The Miami of Canada
83 posts, read 109,135 times
Reputation: 82
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigLake
Philadelphia is certainly one ot the top urban (~top 5 in US) centers and in some areas has a mini-Manhattan feel, but it doesn't compare to the scope of Chicago. Yes, Loop is dense, but really when I think of density in Chicago I think of the broad swath from Old Town to Rogers Park. There are section of the South Side with high-grade density as well.
|
This is the broad swath you are referring to (Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/paytonc/3785616575)
|
|

10-14-2010, 04:00 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Brooklyn, New York
10,612 posts, read 4,043,050 times
Reputation: 3633
|
|
|
Chicago's most urban neighborhoods are probably more urban than Philadelphia's most urban neighborhoods, but Philadelphia overall has more neighborhoods of high density.
When I was in Chicago a couple of months ago, I rode through a number of places on the South side that looked really desolate. There'd be a building, and then a huge field, and then another building, and then a house, then a gas station. It just seemed very empty. There are abandoned neighborhoods all over Philadelphia, but the fact that everything seems jammed together gives those areas of the city a more urban feel.
Also, I think that Philadelphia's outer neighborhoods are fairly walkable. When you get away from central Chicago, I found that you needed a car for nearly everything. Even in Mt. Airy, you can hike over to G-Town or Chew Ave for a sandwich or some batteries.
|
|

10-14-2010, 04:06 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: NC/IL/MI
3,401 posts, read 3,194,704 times
Reputation: 1332
|
|
|
i think chicago has more areas with a suburban feel than philly despite having a higher population density
|
|

10-14-2010, 04:07 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: NC/IL/MI
3,401 posts, read 3,194,704 times
Reputation: 1332
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BajanYankee
Chicago's most urban neighborhoods are probably more urban than Philadelphia's most urban neighborhoods, but Philadelphia overall has more neighborhoods of high density.
When I was in Chicago a couple of months ago, I rode through a number of places on the South side that looked really desolate. There'd be a building, and then a huge field, and then another building, and then a house, then a gas station. It just seemed very empty. There are abandoned neighborhoods all over Philadelphia, but the fact that everything seems jammed together gives those areas of the city a more urban feel.
Also, I think that Philadelphia's outer neighborhoods are fairly walkable. When you get away from central Chicago, I found that you needed a car for nearly everything. Even in Mt. Airy, you can hike over to G-Town or Chew Ave for a sandwich or some batteries.
|
what streets you were driving on? most of the south side is not like that (i think we've been thru this dicussion before)
|
|

10-14-2010, 04:25 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Brooklyn, New York
10,612 posts, read 4,043,050 times
Reputation: 3633
|
|
|
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|
|