Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-05-2010, 04:43 PM
 
4,692 posts, read 9,300,167 times
Reputation: 1330

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by DANNYY View Post
Houston & Dallas-Fort Worth have the most dynamic economies in the country for any major metropolitan area (along with Washington DC). If they shrank, then you can bet that's bad news for the American economy in general.

Houston, Washington DC, & Dallas-Fort Worth are doing great and Houston's GDP is the fastest growing in the nation by far and away, growing at the rate of 22% for a 3 year period, Washington DC is at 13%, and Dallas-Fort Worth is at 16%. Houston this year, or next year will pass up Boston by CSA (easily). By MSA it's already the 4th largest economy in the nation.
By the way, that is freakin amazing what Houston is doing as far as GDP. Unlike Boston, Bay Area, DC-Baltimore, and NYC Houston doesn't really have other significant contributors to its area. Boston has Providence and Worcester, DC has Baltimore, SF has Oakland and San Jose, NYC has Bridgeport, New Haven, and Trenton that add a relatively significant amount to its CSA GDP. I see Houston as like the Chicago of the South. It is THE principal city of its area and the talent/business hub. Of course, Chicago stretches to include the majority of the midWest and Houston doesn't. But I think Houston should pass Boston in the middle of this decade.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-05-2010, 04:45 PM
 
4,692 posts, read 9,300,167 times
Reputation: 1330
Quote:
Originally Posted by DANNYY View Post
Atlanta shrank. I'm out at the moment but I'll get to any questions in a few hours when I get home.
Ok. When you're checking figures, check the BEA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2010, 04:58 PM
 
Location: Fernadina Beach
282 posts, read 634,303 times
Reputation: 107
Very interesting thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2010, 05:03 PM
 
758 posts, read 1,960,708 times
Reputation: 389
Houston is definitely coming on strong. Congratulations to Houston.

So the future top 5?

1. NYC
2. LA
3. DC
4. Houston
5. SF
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2010, 05:07 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,931,774 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by adavi215 View Post
By the way, that is freakin amazing what Houston is doing as far as GDP. Unlike Boston, Bay Area, DC-Baltimore, and NYC Houston doesn't really have other significant contributors to its area. Boston has Providence and Worcester, DC has Baltimore, SF has Oakland and San Jose, NYC has Bridgeport, New Haven, and Trenton that add a relatively significant amount to its CSA GDP. I see Houston as like the Chicago of the South. It is THE principal city of its area and the talent/business hub. Of course, Chicago stretches to include the majority of the midWest and Houston doesn't. But I think Houston should pass Boston in the middle of this decade.
yeah, that is what I said on the first page, I was wondering what the economy would be like if the area around Houston was populated with goodies like those other cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2010, 05:10 PM
 
1,728 posts, read 4,725,773 times
Reputation: 487
It will still be NYC, LA, Chicago in our lifetime, followed closely by DC and Houston. DC is reaching build out capacity, meaning there is no more room to expand. That's the same problem with San Francisco. Houston still has a long way to catch up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2010, 05:14 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,931,774 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by chitown85 View Post
Houston still has a long way to catch up.
to what?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2010, 05:21 PM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,148,184 times
Reputation: 14762
Quote:
Originally Posted by HtownLove View Post
Wow look at Houston go.

I wonder what the CSA would be like if it had:

a Baltimore, an Arlington or a an Alexandria like DC has, or a
Riverside- San B like LA has, or a
Oakland- San Jose like SF has, or a
Fort Worth, Arlington, Grapevine, Irvine, Mesquite.... that Dallas has, or a
Cambridge, Providence... that Boston has, or a
Fort Lauderdale like Miami, or a
Tacoma Bellevue, like Seattle....


Just wondering....
Miami doesn't have Ft. Lauderdale in a CSA because there isn't a CSA...only a MSA....a 3 county MSA with half the land mass in a swamp. I think South Florida represents really well considering its tiny developed land mass compared to some of the others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2010, 05:24 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,931,774 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by rnc2mbfl View Post
Miami doesn't have Ft. Lauderdale in a CSA because there isn't a CSA...only a MSA....a 3 county MSA with half the land mass in a swamp. I think South Florida represents really well considering its tiny developed land mass compared to some of the others.
It doesn't matter where it is, we would gladly welcome a Fort Lauderdale here
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2010, 05:35 PM
 
Location: Pasadena
882 posts, read 2,244,621 times
Reputation: 466
Quote:
Originally Posted by HtownLove View Post
to what?
It was a good thing, Im pretty sure the poster meant that Houston, obviously not being built out, still has a lot of time to reach its economic potential as opposed to most other metros who can only grow its economy in very limited quantities.

Sprawl is bad, but if you have a strong enough central city economically, it allows that metro to have an advantage by having more land and resources to expand its population and economy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top