Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Are there any legitimately and wholly terrible cities??
No 24 21.62%
Gary 11 9.91%
East St. Louis 18 16.22%
Flint 8 7.21%
Camden 13 11.71%
Other 8 7.21%
Atlanta (sorry, but i havent taken a shot at the ATL lately) 29 26.13%
Voters: 111. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-06-2010, 10:43 AM
 
531 posts, read 1,143,130 times
Reputation: 285

Advertisements

also, isn't the cost of living in these 'terrible' places extremely cheap? if so, that could be at least one redeeming quality they all have..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-06-2010, 11:41 AM
 
Location: New Jersey
908 posts, read 1,828,480 times
Reputation: 476
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5ive8ight5ive View Post
also, isn't the cost of living in these 'terrible' places extremely cheap? if so, that could be at least one redeeming quality they all have..
In Camden it depends on what part of the city you are in. Real estate on the waterfront is not cheap.

Victor Lofts

Camden Waterfront in Camden, New Jersey | Camden Waterfront
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2010, 11:59 AM
 
Location: Virginia Highland, GA
1,937 posts, read 4,708,019 times
Reputation: 1288
This thread is a joke, and wish the moderator had the gumption to close it...Yea, Atlanta is worse than Gary, E. Saint Louis, Flint, Camden, please give it a break.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2010, 12:10 PM
 
Location: Houston
2,023 posts, read 4,185,234 times
Reputation: 467
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5ive8ight5ive View Post
also, isn't the cost of living in these 'terrible' places extremely cheap? if so, that could be at least one redeeming quality they all have..
In places like Lubbock, it's cheap for a reason. You have a high crime rate, the job market overly is saturated by T Tech grads, it's in quite possibly the ugliest location in West Texas (which is saying a lot), and rednecks who stay in Lubbock for ten years after college graduation to experience the "college party life" also tend to drive down the real estate value.

Quote:
Originally Posted by brent6969 View Post
This thread is a joke, and wish the moderator had the gumption to close it...Yea, Atlanta is worse than Gary, E. Saint Louis, Flint, Camden, please give it a break.....
You know, the thread wouldn't be dominated by the discussion about how much poor Atlanta is picked on if the Atlanta boosters didn't keep bringing it up.

Last edited by wpmeads; 12-06-2010 at 12:23 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2010, 12:51 PM
 
Location: St Paul, MN - NJ's Gold Coast
5,251 posts, read 13,809,153 times
Reputation: 3178
No.

Every city has their issues, Gary and Camden for example were once vibrant, well maintained cities. They both crumbled for the same reason. The industrial hype came to an end and people fled to the burbs. The poverty was all that could stick around for the most part. When a place gets abandoned like that, the crime spreads.

A city is only terrible because one thinks it's terrible, there aren't any truly terrible cities. Of course, I'm not saying places like ESTL/Camden/Gary etc are special little cities- They're for the most part, dumps- But if you were to take a tour of these cities and look past the grit and decay. You can see that they were once beautiful cities.

I know that the arts program in Camden has posted numerous videos of the talent throughout the city. To know there's good, wholesome people living in these places makes these people all the more special. (Michael Jackson came from Gary) It's not easy growing up successfully in these kinds of places. The more hope the better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2010, 01:43 PM
 
93,191 posts, read 123,783,345 times
Reputation: 18253
Quote:
Originally Posted by gogetta View Post
Flint's Southside used to be the worst part of the city, although nowadays this is not true. Crime is certainly worse today in the North and East sections of the city but it is still bad in the immediate southside. Some of the worst urban decay and blight in the city can be found on the Southside (at least in my experience with the city of Flint, having lived there on and off throughout my childhood and into my early adult years).
I thought parts of the Eastside near Kearsley were still alright. It seems like the Westside into the Carmen-Ainsworth area is alright and seems to be what I call Flint's Black suburbia is located in terms of a nice urban/suburban area with a high Black population. It's been a while since I've been out that way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2010, 01:45 PM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,719,635 times
Reputation: 14745
i really dislike atlanta, but even i can see plenty of positive traits about the city.

if i had to pick somewhere that was just thoroughly awful... i'd pick Fayetteville, NC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2010, 01:59 PM
 
1,081 posts, read 2,266,552 times
Reputation: 924
Quote:
Originally Posted by brent6969 View Post
This thread is a joke, and wish the moderator had the gumption to close it...Yea, Atlanta is worse than Gary, E. Saint Louis, Flint, Camden, please give it a break.....
I get your point, but I personally would much rather live in Camden than in Atlanta.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2010, 02:26 PM
 
2,563 posts, read 6,055,477 times
Reputation: 879
There are a ton of terrible cities:
Labelle, FL
Ft. Pierce, FL
Okeechobee, FL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2010, 02:29 PM
 
Location: St Simons Island, GA
23,447 posts, read 44,050,291 times
Reputation: 16788
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5ive8ight5ive View Post
lmao there's the ATL posters like you and brent6969 that make me feel the need to take shots at ATL every so often. then there's ATL posters like Akhen. (and a bunch of others) that make me regret doing it after.

there's nothing wrong with your city. there's just something wrong with a couple of you guys.

outside of this forum, I would never criticize ATL--and I'm sure many of the 'ATL haters' on here wouldn't either. a few of you just make it absolutely necessary.
*Sigh* I rest my case. Sad, sad, sad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:40 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top