Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which did you like more?
Washington DC 215 40.87%
Los Angeles 248 47.15%
Neither 30 5.70%
Too close to call 30 5.70%
Other 3 0.57%
Voters: 526. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-27-2012, 12:24 AM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
9,828 posts, read 9,410,810 times
Reputation: 6288

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by RaymondChandlerLives View Post
What a baffling post.

The amount of foreign born living in L.A.'s CSA is probably equal to D.C.'s entire metro population (5.6 million).

Quote:
Originally Posted by john_starks View Post
i'm not saying LA isn't international. of course it is..

south asians ha - lancaster right? is that the valley? i have no idea


DC is also very international, and city proper makes it feel more
concentrated imo
You just said L.A. gets a "one" in international feel. That's pretty low.

Foreign born in D.C. = 13% out of 617,000
Foreign born in L.A. = 39.6% out of 3.8 million

Last edited by RaymondChandlerLives; 02-27-2012 at 12:56 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-27-2012, 12:40 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
5,003 posts, read 5,975,356 times
Reputation: 4323
Quote:
Originally Posted by john_starks View Post
i'm not saying LA isn't international. of course it is..

south asians ha - lancaster right? is that the valley? i have no idea


DC is also very international, and city proper makes it feel more
concentrated imo
I'm not an expert, but I do know that Little India is in Artesia, which is in the basin on the other side of Long Beach near the Orange County border. Little Bangladesh overlaps with Koreatown near downtown.

I can see how DC might give a different feel than LA, but LA also has many ethnic neighborhoods. Not just streets and restaurants, but actual neighborhoods including: Russian, Thai, Armenian, Japanese, Filipino, Korean, Chinese, Orthodox Jewish, Vietnamese, Cambodian, Bangladeshi, and of course many different Hispanic ones.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2012, 06:50 AM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,895,654 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by munchitup View Post
Actually LA had quite a few places with 60k + ppsm, not sure if as many as DC but certainly very close. The highest tract in LA is 90k I believe. These areas are heavy rail accessible so I'm not seeing your point... It's definitely not too late.

No LA is far denser than DC on many levels; DC is not as dense as Boston, SF, or Philly - nor Chicago, LA or NYC

That is fact. LA is overall and at its peak much denser than DC. It is however construvcted differently in some ways but is definately more dense
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2012, 06:55 AM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,895,654 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDAllstar View Post
Who is talking about metro area? I'm talking about city proper. In fact, when I reference L.A., I'm only talking about L.A. city proper. American transit numbers are low period compared to European cities outside of NYC because of our infatuation with the car. D.C. is second in the nation though joining NYC as the only two systems that average over 1 million daily subway riders and that is just a fact.

MD why do you insist on discussing Metro in the same breath as NYC

Lets see NYC what like 8-9 million

and Metro 1 Million - yep close

You sound like a fool. Metro is in the same realm as Chicago, Boston, Philly and SF (soon to be LA) and not NYC - stop such nonesense and dont say well they are the only over a million. look at the numbers one is 9 times the size - NOT comparable stop it
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2012, 06:56 AM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,895,654 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by munchitup View Post
Funny that DC is still tops in traffic congestion... One of the downsides of centralization.
With more highways miles per capita relative to many other cities with large transit systems
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2012, 06:59 AM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,895,654 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDAllstar View Post
Yes it does include the Silver Line. I'm talking about core capacity. The system will not reach capacity. The core will reach capacity. That 1.5 million is for daily riders by the way so APTA's number will be over 2,500,000 daily riders on Metro by 2030. Metro Center, Gallery Place, L' Enfant Plaza etc. ect. can't handle that type of load which is what I mean by core capacity downtown. The streetcars need to give relief. 8 car trains during rush hour in D.C. can be so packed during rush hour you have to wait for the next one sometimes. Just imagine in 20 years.

I have to do it. But ALL this assumes the Govt continues to increase in size and grow the economy and subsidize all this, I dont believe this for a second actually the size of Govt will be quite the issue come this fall

So talk all you want about the future but no I dont see 2.5 million riders in 2020. Metro is a great system BTW but projections are just that and reality is a whole other thing

You are projecting the continuance of the most prosperous 15 years in the DC life span. Nearly all driven by an inprecedented growth in Govt, guess what trends change (And no I am by no means a hater, I am a realist)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2012, 07:02 AM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,895,654 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaymondChandlerLives View Post
D.C.'s diversity is more walkable.

Probably true actually
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2012, 07:11 AM
 
41 posts, read 45,327 times
Reputation: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDAllstar View Post
+1

Maybe MD2LAFTW and Johnatl can be roommates out in L.A. They both seem to really want to be there based on their posts in this thread. What are you waiting for? Stop complaining and move!
Please, you sound like some kid who has never left the DC area, so you sit around and obsess about how it is supposedly better than big time cities like NYC, LA, Chicago, Boston, San Fran, Atlanta, etc. Here's a little secret: Outside of DC suburban MD and Northern VA, no one really cares about the parasitic little southern towern situated along the Potomac or how many people ride its little choochoo train. This is not Europe, this is America, and the only place where taking the subway is cool is NYC, Boston and maybe Chicago. Most of the rest of the country would rather drive their own vehicles to get around.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2012, 07:51 AM
 
515 posts, read 986,156 times
Reputation: 264
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDAllstar View Post
Who is talking about metro area? I'm talking about city proper. In fact, when I reference L.A., I'm only talking about L.A. city proper. American transit numbers are low period compared to European cities outside of NYC because of our infatuation with the car. D.C. is second in the nation though joining NYC as the only two systems that average over 1 million daily subway riders and that is just a fact.
D.C. Metro ridership is MUCH closer to Chicago's than it is New York's. New York City has 7.8 million daily riders, that's 6.8 million more daily riders than DC's 1 million. Chicago has 730,000 daily riders, that is only 300,000 less daily riders than DC [Source].

Bottom line, DC and NYC are simply not in the same league in terms of transportation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2012, 07:54 AM
 
5,347 posts, read 10,154,410 times
Reputation: 2446
Quote:
Originally Posted by MD2LAFTW View Post
Please, you sound like some kid who has never left the DC area, so you sit around and obsess about how it is supposedly better than big time cities like NYC, LA, Chicago, Boston, San Fran, Atlanta, etc. Here's a little secret: Outside of DC suburban MD and Northern VA, no one really cares about the parasitic little southern towern situated along the Potomac or how many people ride its little choochoo train. This is not Europe, this is America, and the only place where taking the subway is cool is NYC, Boston and maybe Chicago. Most of the rest of the country would rather drive their own vehicles to get around.

A new account? LOL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top