|
View Poll Results: Which is worst
|
|
Washington, D.C.
|
  
|
26 |
11.40% |
|
New York City
|
  
|
54 |
23.68% |
|
Chicago
|
  
|
111 |
48.68% |
|
Los Angeles
|
  
|
16 |
7.02% |
|
Atlanta
|
  
|
21 |
9.21% |
 |
|
|

01-15-2011, 12:04 AM
|
|
|
|
Location: nyc/philly/pg county.
5,171 posts, read 3,847,379 times
Reputation: 862
|
|
|
if nyc were to ever tear down their housing projects to the extent of Atlanta we would have to make a new borough for all those people.
|
|

01-15-2011, 01:00 AM
|
|
|
|
Location: Baltimore
1,771 posts, read 1,357,197 times
Reputation: 477
|
|
Baltimore use to have highrises but they started tearing them down back in 1996

|
|

01-15-2011, 01:38 AM
|
|
|
|
803 posts, read 264,819 times
Reputation: 284
|
|
|
The title should have was in the place of is but from what I heard from all the old heads (25 and up lol) the projects that had national attention was Chi-town(Cabrini Green, Robert Taylor etc.) and A-town(Bankhead, Techwood etc.) for notoriety along with New Orleans... other than that everything else had regional or local notoriety
|
|

01-15-2011, 04:47 AM
|
|
|
|
Location: The Bay
6,509 posts, read 4,149,350 times
Reputation: 2553
|
|
|
How do you talk about big city projects and NOT mention San Francisco? Valencia Gardens (demolished), Geneva Towers (demolished), Double Rock, Alamany, Sunnydale, Oakdale, 200 Randolph, etc... the majority of these are still standing and as ****ty as ever.
|
|

01-15-2011, 06:31 AM
|
|
|
|
Location: nyc/philly/pg county.
5,171 posts, read 3,847,379 times
Reputation: 862
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrRedd
Baltimore use to have highrises but they started tearing them down back in 1996
|
looks like nyc.
|
|

01-15-2011, 07:41 AM
|
|
|
|
Location: Clinton Hill, Brooklyn
383 posts, read 461,141 times
Reputation: 112
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by knowledgeiskey
Housing projects are all getting knocked down across the country with the exception of NYC. NYC was always known to maintain its public housing.
|
I've really got to disagree with this. The only reason why Housing Projects have done so well in NYC, and in Yonkers and Mount Vernon is because a HUGE population of NYC is low income. So Housing projects have done VERY well for poor/ low income familes. Now NYC maintaining it is mad BS.
Most of the PJ's over here are mad grimy and dumd violent. If NYC didn't have such a huge low income pop we wouldn't have as many housing projects as we do now. So cities that don't have as many PJs are doing much better off then we are. I'm not even gunna lie if i wasn't living dude jay over here in Clinton Hill, i'd be living over in Projects over here So if you ask me NY wins this.
|
|

01-15-2011, 08:56 AM
|
|
|
|
Location: Cleveland
2,939 posts, read 1,504,112 times
Reputation: 1356
|
|
|
Do any true housing projects (ala HUD) even exist anymore? In Minneapolis, I believe there were twenty something HUD housing projects and ALL of them were torn down in the 1990's. Chicago also. I'm not sure what is still allowable anymore, and what is may not be the HUD nightmare housing like Cabrini Green or Stateway Gardens.
|
|

01-15-2011, 09:06 AM
|
|
|
|
Location: Chicago
2,897 posts, read 1,994,316 times
Reputation: 1612
|
|
|
Chicago has a couple Low rise projects.
All the high rises have been torn down or abandoned.
But just 15-20 years ago the Highrise projects where poppin
|
|

01-15-2011, 09:15 AM
|
|
|
|
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
11,180 posts, read 10,307,166 times
Reputation: 3701
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HoodsofATL
The title should have was in the place of is but from what I heard from all the old heads (25 and up lol) the projects that had national attention was Chi-town(Cabrini Green, Robert Taylor etc.) and A-town(Bankhead, Techwood etc.) for notoriety along with New Orleans... other than that everything else had regional or local notoriety
|
I've heard of Bankhead but only in songs. Not to the level that you hear of with Chicago and New Orleans projects. Now Chicago yes and most of the highrise projects are being torn down. New Orleans as well. For notoriety, I would say Chicago, New York, and New Orleans. Washington DC? Nah.
|
|

01-15-2011, 09:16 AM
|
|
|
|
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
11,180 posts, read 10,307,166 times
Reputation: 3701
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jordandubreil
videos dont really tell me much becuase their made for a purpose. The hood to hood videos were basically all the same videos in different hoods.
also fights seem to be a issue in nyc and dc subways haha.
|
It was basically a hood2hood exploitmentary.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|
Similar Threads
-
New York City projects vs Chicago projects(both in their heyday), City vs. City, 70 replies
-
the Tenderloin of SF vs. the worst parts of Tampa: housing, City vs. City, 5 replies
-
What US city is the best/worst sports city (best teams, fans), City vs. City, 366 replies
-
Show us some projects (infrastructure, monuments, skyscrapers..) expected in your city after 2011, City vs. City, 17 replies
-
cities with the best looking up to date housing projects???, City vs. City, 13 replies
-
Worst city where the worst rappers come out of, City vs. City, 1 replies
|